Tooltips
These principles have also been applied by this Court whilst considering an analogous provision of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the case of Basavaraj R. Patil v. State of Karnataka [(2000) 8 SCC 740] the question was whether an...
In the case of State vs S. J. Chowdhury [(1996) 2 SCC 428] it was held that the Evidence Act was an ongoing Act and the word “handwriting” in Section 45 of that Act was construed to include “typewriting”....
The expression ‘so far as they are applicable’ as occurring in Rule 21 of Order XVI of C.P.C. has to be read in the light of the other provisions of C.P.C. as applicable in this regard. In case there...
The Apex Court in S. P. Chenglvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath, (1994) 1 SCC 1 in the following words : “5. The High Court, in our view, fell into patent error. The short question before the High Court was whether...
Order I of C.P.C., indicates who can be parties to the suit and a person filing the suit is to be called a plaintiff and those defending the same are to be called defendant/s. The plaintiff/s and the defendant/s,...
In Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr. [2012 (7) SCC 621] In G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P. [2000 (2) SCC 636 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 513] wherein during the pendency of the proceedings under...
In Shri Kumar Prasad v. Union of India and Others [(1992) 2 SCC 428], this Court held: “22. It is in the above context that we have to interpret the meaning of expression “judicial office” under Article 217(2)(a) of...
A process of getting input and feedback from legal professionals, experts, interested parties and members of the public on a proposed piece of work.