The song was writen in mixed Sanskrit and Bengali language. वन्दे मातरम् सुजलां सुफलाम् – मलयजशीतलाम् शस्यश्यामलाम् -मातरम्।—1 शुभ्रज्योत्स्नापुलकितयामिनीम् फुल्लकुसुमितद्रुमदलशोभिनीम् सुहासिनीं सुमधुर भाषिणीम् सुखदां वरदां मातरम्।—-2 सप्त-कोटि-कण्ठ-कल-कल-निनाद-कराले द्विसप्त-कोटि-भुजैर्धृत-खरकरवाले, के बोले मा तुमी अबले […]
Financial Research : Premier Institutions In India
The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) is a centre for research in public economics and policies. Founded in 1976, the institute […]
Smt. Ragini Rai Vs. Union Of India Thru Secy. And Others [AHC] – 20/05/2019
Judicial Review – In proceedings and decisions taken in administrative matters, the scope of judicial review is confined to the decision-making process and does not extend to the merits of the decision taken.
Organ & Blood Donation in Islam.
Organ & Blood Donation is Halal in Islam.
Passing Off
The High Court of Justice – Chancery Division, England, in Benchairs Ltd. Vs. Chair Centre Ltd.[1974 R.P.C. (14) 429 ], has given the essence of passing off and the same reads as […]
How to frame issue [Model form]
This court was pleased to frame the following issues by order dated 1332013 read with order dated 842013 and the same read as under: (1) Whether the Suit as filed by the […]
M/s IMAPG India Pvt Ltd. vs Accupack and ors [BHC] – 13/06/2019
Trade Mark- Passing off Action-It is settled law as noted earlier that plaintiff who alleges passing off must first establish that the public has grown accustomed to associate a particular product with that of plaintiff as the manufacturer or dealer in that product. There has to be an element of exclusivity attached to that product.
Birendra Prasad Sah Vs. State of Bihar & ANR – 08/05/19
Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881-Issuance of successive notices is permissible under the provisions of Section 138-Condonation of Delay-The CJM condoned the delay on the cause which was shown by the appellant and it is evident that the appellant had indicated sufficient cause for seeking condonation of the delay in the institution of the complaint.
Hemareddi (D) through LRS. Vs. Ramachandra Yallappa Hosmani and Ors – 07/05/19
ABATEMENT OF SUIT- Death of a party during the currency of a litigation -The impact of death of the late brother of the appellant qua the proceeding is one arising out of the incompatibility of a decree which has become final with the decree which the appellant invites the appellate court to pass.
State represented by Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. M. Subrahmanyam – 07/05/19
Section 173(2)(5)(a), Cr.P.C- The failure to bring the authorisation on record, as observed, was more a matter of procedure, which is but a handmaid of justice. Substantive justice must always prevail over procedural or technical justice. To hold that failure to explain delay in a procedural matter would operate as res judicata will be a travesty of justice considering that the present is a matter relating to corruption in public life by holder of a public post. The rights of an accused are undoubtedly important, but so is the rule of law and societal interest in ensuring that an alleged offender be subjected to the laws of the land in the larger public interest. To put the rights of an accused at a higher pedestal and to make the rule of law and societal interest in prevention of crime, subservient to the same cannot be considered as dispensation of justice. A balance therefore has to be struck. A procedural lapse cannot be placed at par with what is or may be substantive violation of the law.
Sasikala Pushpa and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu – 07/05/19
Forging Vakalatnama-A Vakalatnama is only a document which authorizes an advocate to appear on behalf of the party and by and large, it has no bearing on the merits of the case. Before proceeding to make a complaint regarding commission of an offence referred to in Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C., the court must satisfy itself that “it is expedient in the interest of justice”. The language in Section 340 Cr.P.C. shows that such a course will be adopted only if the interest of justice requires and not in every case.
Snigdha Mukherjee –vs- State of West Bengal & Anr – 20/07/2018
Reduction of the amount of interim maintenance awarded by the Magistrate u/s 23 of DV Act without giving an opportunity of hearing to the opposite party/wife is illegal on a petition by husband before Sessions Judge u/s 29 of DV Act.
Rafiq Qureshi Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau Eastern Zonal Unit – 07/05/19
NDPS-Section 21(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-where Court imposes a punishment higher than minimum relying on an irrelevant factor and no other factor as enumerated in Section 32B(a to f) are present award of sentence higher than minimum can be interfered with.
Ashoksinh Jayendrasinh Vs. State of Gujarat – 07/05/19
Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC- Life imprisonment converted into acquittal by giving benefit of doubt-Supreme Court would be slow to interfere with the concurrent findings of the courts below. In an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with unless shown to be perverse (vide Mahesh Dattatray Thirthkar v. State of Maharashtra (2009) 11 SCC 141). Where the appreciation of evidence is erroneous, the Supreme Court would certainly appreciate the evidence.
Tejaswini Gaud and Others Vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and Others – 06/05/19
Custody of the Child given to the father – Writ of habeas corpus is a prerogative process for securing the liberty of the subject by affording an effective means of immediate release from an illegal or improper detention. The writ also extends its influence to restore the custody of a minor to his guardian when wrongfully deprived of it. The detention of a minor by a person who is not entitled to his legal custody is treated as equivalent to illegal detention for the purpose of granting writ, directing custody of the minor child.
Jiten K. Ajmera & ANR. Vs. M/s. Tejas Cooperative Housing Society – 06/05/19
Consumer Complaint – Additional evidence before State Consumer Commission – Section 107(1) (d) r.w. Rule 27 of Order XLI, CPC – Under Order XLI Rule 27, CPC a party can produce additional evidence at the appellate stage, if it establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within its knowledge, or could not even after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by it at the time when the decree appealed against was passed.
The tenfold acts of Lord Vishnu
वेदानुद्धरते जगन्निवहते भूगोलमुद्बिभ्रते दैत्यम् दारयते बलिम् छलयते क्षत्रक्षयम् कुर्वते। पौलस्त्यम् जयते हलम् कलयते कारुण्यमातन्वते म्लेच्छान्मूर्च्छयते दशाकृतिकृते कृष्णाय तुभ्यम् नमः॥ १-५ वेदान् उद्धरते जगत् निवहते भू गोलम् उद् बिभ्रते दैत्यम् दारयते बलिम् च्छलयते […]
Aditya Hridaya of Sage Agastya
ततो युद्धपरिश्रान्तं समरे चिन्तया स्थितम् । रावणं चाग्रतो दृष्ट्वा युद्धाय समुपस्थितम् ॥1॥ दैवतैश्च समागम्य द्रष्टुमभ्यागतो रणम् । उपगम्याब्रवीद् राममगस्त्यो भगवांस्तदा ॥2॥ राम राम महाबाहो श्रृणु गुह्मं सनातनम् । येन सर्वानरीन् वत्स समरे […]
