All

Search Results

Forums
Topics

                                     

1948 CE 2000CE 2011CE 2014CE 2015CE 2016CE 2018CE 2019CE 2020CE 2021CE 2022 2022SCJ 2023 2023SCJ Africa Asia Bail Bail cancellation Bail Granted BANGLADESH bengali Bilateral Relations BRITISH INDIA Canada China Christian Theology CongressParty Constitution Constitutional Courts COVID-19 Criminaldigest currentaffairs Democracy Domestic Violence Education EU Europe EUROPEANUNION France G-20 Generalstudies GlobalUpdates Goudiya HinduReligion Hinduttva Howrah District Court India ISKCON JoeBiden judgment JUDGMENTS Lectures LEGAL MK Gandhi Modi NATO NDPS OSHO Pakistan POCSO Portals Putin RBI Roman Catholics Rule of Law Russia Sanskrit Sanskrit Devanagari Section 482 Cr.P.C Speech Supremecourtsaid Topnews TREATY UK UKParliamentDebate Ukraine Ukraine war USA Vatican City State west bengal

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: