ThirdPartyContract – Advocatetanmoy Law Library

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person who is not a party to a contract (referred to in this Act as a third party) may, in his own right, enforce a term of the contract if— (a) the contract expressly provides that he may; or (b) subject to subsection (2), the term purports to confer a benefit on him.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Arjun Gopal vs Union Of India-29/10/2021

On Diwali days or on any other festivals like Gurupurab, etc., when such fireworks generally take place, it would strictly be from 8.00 p.m. till 10.00 p.m. only. On Christmas eve and New Year’s eve, when such fireworks start around midnight i.e. 12.00 a.m., it would be from 11.55 p.m. till 12.30 a.m. only.

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. Union of India and Ors-27/10/2021

Pegasus suite of spywares-we constitute a Technical Committee comprising of three members, including those who are experts in cyber security, digital forensics, networks and hardware, whose functioning will be overseen by Justice R.V. Raveendran,

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr-29/09/2021

GRANTING BAIL-The issue of bail is one of liberty, justice, public safety and burden of the public treasury, all of which insist that a developed jurisprudence of bail is integral to a socially sensitised judicial process

Vishwabandhu Vs. Sri Krishna and Anr-29/09/2021

MONEY SUIT-Ex Party Decree-Execution-Notice- when a notice is sent by registered post and is returned with a postal endorsement “refused” or “not available in the house” or “house locked” or “shop closed” or “addressee not in station”, due service has to be presumed.

Suraz India Trust Vs. Union of India-29/09/2021

CONTEMPT OF COURT- Court has held that an apology cannot be a defence, a justification can be accepted if it can be ignored without compromising the dignity of the Court

State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. Vs. Shaheena Masarat & Anr- 29/09/2021

SERVICE LAW-Appointments to public posts should be strictly in accordance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Eligibility criteria should be uniform and there cannot be scope of arbitrary selections

Harjit Singh Vs. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and Anr – 24/08/2021

Apex Court does not interfere with Bail order of HC. But, where the discretion of HC to grant bail has been exercised without due application of mind or in contravention of directions of apex Court, granting bail is liable to be set aside.

Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors – 19/08/2021

It is made clear that person is entitled to claim benefit of reservation in either of the successor State of Bihar or State of Jharkhand, but will not be entitled to claim benefit simultaneously

Supreme Court of USA	Supreme Court of UK	Supreme Court of India
European Court	International Court Of Justice	Supreme Court of China
Supreme Court of Canada	Supreme Court of Australia