Tagged: NDPS
- This topic has 2 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 months, 1 week ago by
Aparajita JNU.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
27/12/2018 at 00:14 #121387
advtanmoy
KeymasterIn VAMAN NARAIN GHIYA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[(2009) 2 SCC 281] Supreme Court Held : Section 438 is a procedural provision which
[See the full post at: Bail and Anticipatory Bail Means] -
15/01/2023 at 01:00 #121388
advtanmoy
KeymasterNDPS Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable
37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable. — (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),–
(a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable;
(b) no person accused of an offence punishable for offences under section 19 or section 24 or section 27A and also for offences involving commercial quantity] shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless–
(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release, and
(ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
(2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail.
36A. Offences triable by Special Courts.-– (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),
(a) all offences under this Act which are punishable with imprisonment for a term of more than three years shall be triable only by the Special Court constituted for the area in which the offence has been committed or where there are more Special Courts than one for such area, by such one of them as may be specified in this behalf by the Government;
(b) where a person accused of or suspected of the commission of an offence under this Act is forwarded to a Magistrate under sub-section (2) or sub-section (2A) of section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), such Magistrate may authorise the detention of such person in such custody as he thinks fit for a period not exceeding fifteen days in the whole where such Magistrate is a Judicial Magistrate and seven days in the whole where such Magistrate is an Executive Magistrate:
Provided that in cases which are triable by the Special Court where such Magistrate considers
(i) when such person is forwarded to him as aforesaid; or
(ii) upon or at any time before the expiry of the period of detention authorised by him, that the detention of such person is unnecessary, he shall order such person to be forwarded to the Special Court having jurisdiction;
(c) the Special Court may exercise, in relation to the person forwarded to it under clause (b), the same power which a Magistrate having jurisdiction to try a case may exercise under section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in relation to an accused person in such case who has been forwarded to him under that section;
(d) a Special Court may, upon perusal of police report of the facts constituting an offence under this Act or upon complaint made by an officer of the Central Government or a State Government authorised in his behalf, take cognizance of that offence without the accused being committed to it for trial.
(2) When trying an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an offence other than an offence under this Act with which the accused may, under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), be charged at the same trial.
(3) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to affect the special powers of the High Court regarding bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and the High Court may exercise such powers including the power under cluase (b) of sub-section (1) of that section as if the reference to “Magistrate” in that section included also a reference to a Special Court constituted under section 36.
(4) In respect of persons accused of an offence punishable under section 19 or section 24 or section 27A or for offences involving commercial quantity the references in sub-section (2) of section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) thereof to “ninety days”, where they occur, shall be construed as reference to “one hundred and eighty days”:
Provided that, if it is not possible to complete the investigation within the said period of one hundred and eighty days, the Special Court may extend the said period up to one year on the report of the Public Prosecutor indicating the progress of the investigation and the specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the said period of one hundred and eighty days.
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the offences punishable under this Act with imprisonment for a term of not more than three years may be tried summarily.]
1. Subs. by Act 9 of 2001, s. 15, for section 36A (w.e.f. 2-10-2001).
Narcotics Control Bureau vs Krishan Lal And Others (SC)
Equivalent citations: 1991 AIR 558, 1991 SCR (1) 139
Section 37 as amended starts with a non-obstante clause stating that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 no person accused of an offence prescribed therein shall be released on bail unless the conditions contained therein were satisfied. The NDPS Act is a special enactment as already noted it was enacted with a view to make stringent provision for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The being the underlying object and particularly when the provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act are in negative terms limiting the scope of the applicability of the provisions of Cr. P.C. regarding bail, in our view, it cannot be held that the High Court’s powers to grant bail under Section 439 Cr. P.C. are not subject to the limitation mentioned under Section 37 of NDPS Act.
-
02/02/2023 at 01:32 #122521
Aparajita JNU
GuestBAIL APPLICATION UNDER ELECTRICITY ACT
In the Court of the Judge, Spl Court (Elec. Act)-Cum-ASJ 4th Howrah.<br role=”presentation” />Electricity Case no. 54 of 2019<br role=”presentation” />Order No. 6 dated 03.09.2020.
The record is put up on the prayer of accused. The accused Hasnu Hana @<br role=”presentation” />Hasnu Hena surrenders before this Court today. He is taken into custody and<br role=”presentation” />remanded to J.C. till 17.12.2020. An application for bail is filed on behalf of the accused.
Ld. PP in charge is present.
The record is taken up for hearing on the application for bail.
The Ld. Advocate for the accused submits that this accused today surrenders<br role=”presentation” />before the court as W/A was issued against her after submission of charge-sheet. He<br role=”presentation” />submits that the final assessment bill of Rs.19243/- towards unauthorized use of<br role=”presentation” />electricity has been deposited to the WBSEDCL authority. He submits that the<br role=”presentation” />accused preferred an appeal and the appellate authority in connection with Appeal<br role=”presentation” />no.-15/19 has been pleased to reduce the earlier amount of final assessment bill to<br role=”presentation” />Rs.19243/-. He submits that previously on 12.03.2019 the accused paid Rs.15910/-<br role=”presentation” />i.e. 50% of the earlier final assessment bill. He prays for enlarging the<br role=”presentation” />petitioner/accused on bail, on any condition.
Ld. PP in charge on behalf of the State does not oppose the bail prayer.<br role=”presentation” />Perused the materials on record.
It appears to me that today the accused Hasnu Hana @ Hasnu Hena<br role=”presentation” />surrenders before the court as W.A was issued against her after submission of charge-<br role=”presentation” />sheet. It appears to me that previously this accused was not on bail.
It appears to me that an amount of Rs.19243/- (vide certificate issued by<br role=”presentation” />DE(E) & SM, Burikhali CCC, WBSEDCL dated 23.03.2020) against the final<br role=”presentation” />assessment bill in respect of unauthorized use of electricity has been deposited to the<br role=”presentation” />WBSEDCL authority. In view of above, the prayer for enlarging the petitioner/<br role=”presentation” />accused on bail, is considered and allowed. The accused Hasnu Hana @ Hasnu Hena<br role=”presentation” />may be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,000/- with one<br role=”presentation” />registered surety of like amount id to J/C.
To date (17.12.2020) for appearance of the accused if bail bond is furnished<br role=”presentation” />and I.O.’s report.<br role=”presentation” />Recall W.A if it is issued.<br role=”presentation” />Upload the same in the CIS immediately.<br role=”presentation” />Judge, Spl. Court (Elec. Act),<br role=”presentation” />Howrah.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.