Supreme Court Cases hard by 8 judges

KESHAVLAL JETHALAL SHAH Vs MOHANLAL BHAGWANDAS & ANR. – [1968] 3 S.C.R. 623
Judge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI,R.S. BACHAWAT,V. RAMASWAMI,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,K.S. HEGDE
D E F G H KESHAVLAL JETHALAL SHAH v. MOHANLAL BHAGW ANDAS & ANR. April 2, 1968 [M. HmAYATULLAH, C.J., J. c. SHAH, s. M. Soou, R. S. BACHAWAT, V. RAMASWAMI, G. K. MITTER, C. A . VAIDIAL!NGAM AND K. S. HEGDE, JJ.) Bonibay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 57 of 1947, s. 29(1)
Date of decision : 02-04-1968 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1271/1967 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed

PANDIT M. S. M. SHARMA Vs DR. SHREE KRISHNA SINHA AND OTHERS. – [1961] 1 S.C.R. 96
Judge Name: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,SYED JAFFER IMAM,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH
UPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] Dalip Singh v. The Slale of Punjab Das Gupta  August I. observation. It·had.not in that case to deal with a·rule w.liich did provide for compulsory retirement, at any age w·hatsoever irrespective of the length of . service put in. It will not b
Date of decision : 01-08-1960 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/176/1959 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed

IN RE: THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 143(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Vs . – [1960] 3 S.C.R. 250
Judge Name: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,S.K. DAS,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH
ha Nath Mul1herjee v. State of West Bengal Dos Gupta ]. Marth z4. 250 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] tute also a minor offence under s. 323 I.P.C. The Magistrate when he took cognizance under s. 190(l)(b) Cr. P.O. of the offence under s. 332 I.P.C. cannot but have taken cognizance alHo ofthe minor off
Date of decision : 14-03-1960 | Case Number : REF. U/S 143/1/1959 | Disposal Nature : Reference answered

M. P. SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs SATISH CHANDRA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DELHI, AND OTHERS – [1954] 1 S.C.R. 1077
Judge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,GHULAM HASAN,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1077 rendering services which the State considers beneficial in the public interests and which the people have to accept whether they are willing or not. Our conclusion, therefore, is that section 58 is not ultra vires of the State Legislature by reason of the fact that it is
Date of decision : 15-03-1954 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/372/1953 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed