Tagged: supreme court cases
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
advtanmoy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
22/10/2023 at 21:18 #236106
advtanmoy
KeymasterSupreme Court Judgments – 7 judges bench
21/10/2023
Judge Name: J.S. KHEHAR,DIPAK MISRA,JASTI CHELAMESWAR,RANJAN GOGOI,MADAN B. LOKUR,PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE,KURIAN JOSEPH
;. . ‘ [2017] 9 S.C.R. 212 .. t ; IN RE, HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C. S. KARNAN (Suo-motu.Contempt Petition (Ci~it) No. I of 2017) MAY09, 20171ANDJULY04,20172 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, CJI, DIPAK MISRA, J. CHELAMESWAR, RANJAN GOGOi, MADAN B. LOKUR, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND . KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.) . Co11tempt
Date of decision : 09-05-2017 | Case Number : SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL)/1/2017 | Disposal Nature : Disposed offJudge Name: T.S. THAKUR,MADAN B. LOKUR,S.A. BOBDE,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL,UDAY UMESH LALIT,D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,L. NAGESWARA RAO
D E F G H [2017] I S.C.R. 158 ABHIRAM SINGH v. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 37of1992) JANUARY 02, 2017 [T. S. THAKUR, C.J.l., MADAN B. LOKUR, S. A . BOBDE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) Representation of the People
Date of decision : 02-01-2017 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/37/1992 | Direction Issue : REFERRED QUESTION ANSWEREDJudge Name: T.S. THAKUR,MADAN B. LOKUR,S.A. BOBDE,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL,UDAY UMESH LALIT,D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,L. NAGESWARA RAO
1 S.C.R. 83 STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH v. JAI Bm. SINGH (Civil Appeal No.897 of2002) JANUARY 02, 2017 (T. S. THAKL’R, C.J.I., MADAN B. LOKUR, S.A. BOBD.J<~, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGF.SWARA RAO, J.J.} Reference to larger bench – Reference order by a Five-Ju
Date of decision : 02-01-2017 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/897/2002 | Disposal Nature : Matter referred to larger benchJudge Name: T.S. THAKUR,MADAN B. LOKUR,S.A. BOBDE,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL,UDAY UMESH LALIT,D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,L. NAGESWARA RAO
[2017] 5 S.C.R. 160 KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH & ANR v. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5875of1994) JANUARY 01, 2017 [T. S.THAKUR, CJI, MADAN B. LOKUR, S. A . BOBDE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT, DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) Constitution of India: Art.2 I 3 – Prom
Date of decision : 01-01-2017 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5875/1994 | Disposal Nature : Reference answeredJudge Name: R.C. LAHOTI,B.N. AGRAWAL,ARUN KUMAR,G.P. MATHUR,A.K. MATHUR,C.K. THAKKER,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
Arbitration Act, 1940; Ss. 8, 20 and 21 ! The Arbitration and C Conciliation Act, 1996; Ss. 2(h), 2(h), 7, 9, //, /61and 34/Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: D Functions performed by the Chief Justice of Supreme Court/Chief Justices of High Courts under Section 11 of the 1996 Act-Administrative or Jud
Date of decision : 26-10-2005 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4168/2003 | Disposal Nature : Disposed offJudge Name: R.C. LAHOTI,B.N. AGRAWAL,ARUN KUMAR,G.P. MATHUR,A.K. MATHUR,C.K. THAKKER,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
ATE OF GUJARAT v. MJRZAPUR MOTi KURESHI KASSAB JAMA T AND ORS. OCTOBER 26, 2005 [R.C. LAHOTI, CJ., B.N. AGRA WAL, ARUN KUMAR, G.P. MATHUR, A.K. MATHUR, C.K. THAKKER AND P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, JJ.) Constitution of India, 1950: C Articles 19(/)(g), (6), 48, 48- A and 51- A –Constitutional validity of
Date of decision : 26-10-2005 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4937/1998 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: R.C. LAHOTI,Y.K. SABHARWAL,D.M. DHARMADHIKARI,ARUN KUMAR,G.P. MATHUR,TARUN CHATTERJEE,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
ull; P.A. !NAMDAR AND ORS. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. AUGUST 12, 2005 [R.C. LAHOTI, CJ., Y.K. SABHARWAL, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, ARUN KUMAR, G.P. MATHUR, TARUN CHATTERJEE AND P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, JJ.) Constitution of India, 1950 : A B c Articles 19(/)(g), 29 and 30{1), 41and51- A , Seventh Schedu
Date of decision : 12-08-2005 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5041/2005 | Disposal Nature : Reference answered | Direction Issue : ALL PETITIONS , CIVIL APPEALS AND IA’S SHALL NOW BE LISTED BEFORE APPROPRIATE BENCHES FOR HEARING. ANSWERING THE REFERENCEJudge Name: S.P. BHARUCHA,S.S.M. QUADRI,R.C. LAHOTI,N. SANTOSH HEGDE,DORAISWAMY RAJU,RUMA PAL,ARIJIT PASAYAT
Constitution of India, I950-Article I2-Council of Scientific and C Industrial Research (CSIR)-Whether a ‘State ‘-Held, it is ‘State’ falling within the range of the Article as per the t~ts judicially evolved for the purpose Notification bringing CSIR within purview of Section 14(2) of Administ
Date of decision : 16-04-2002 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/992/2002 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.P. BHARUCHA,S.S.M. QUADRI,R.C. LAHOTI,N. SANTOSH HEGDE,DORAISWAMY RAJU,RUMA PAL,ARIJIT PASAYAT
C Constitution of India, 1950-Article 21-Right to speedy trial-Criminal Proceedings-Limitation bar provided by judgment of smaller Benches of Supreme Court-Held, such bar contrary to law laid down by larger Bench in Antulay’s case-Limitation bars not good law, since the same would amount to impermi
Date of decision : 16-04-2002 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/535/2000 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: A.M. AHMADI,M.M. PUNCHHI,K. RAMASWAMY,S.P. BHARUCHA,S. SAGHIR AHMAD,K. VENKATASWAMI,K.T. THOMAS
Constitution of llldia, 1950. Articles 323A (2) (d) and 323B (3) (d)-Tribunals set up pursuallt to Articles 323A and 323B-furisdiction of -Exclusion of jurisdiction of all courts except that of Supreme Court under Article 136-Held, sub-Clause (d) of clause (2) of Article 323A and sub-Clause (d) of
Date of decision : 18-03-1997 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/481/1980 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off | Direction Issue : ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,SABYASACHI MUKHERJI,RANGANATH MISRA,G.L. OZA,B.C. RAY,K.N. SINGH,S. NATARAJAN
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, l<J50: Articles I9{1)(g), 2I, 32, 47, 245, 246, 265, 277, Seventh Schedule, List I Entries], 52, 5Y, /54 96; 97, List II Entries 8, 24, 26, 27, 51, 52, 56 and List III Entries 19 and C 13-Vend Fees and imposts levied under various State Acts-Constitu tional validity o
Date of decision : 25-10-1989 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/182/1980 | Disposal Nature : Case AllowedJudge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,SABYASACHI MUKHERJI,RANGANATH MISRA,G.L. OZA,B.C. RAY,K.N. SINGH,S. NATARAJAN
Madras Panchayats Act, 1958: Sections 115 and 116—Mining lease-Levy of cess on royalty-Held ultra vires. Constitution of India, 1950: Stventh Schedule List II-Entries 23, 49 & 50–Levy of cess on royalty in respect of mining lease Sections 115 & 116 of Madras Panchayats Act 1958-Held
Date of decision : 25-10-1989 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/62/1970 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,SABYASACHI MUKHERJI,RANGANATH MISRA,G.L. OZA,B.C. RAY,K.N. SINGH,S. NATARAJAN
A1HORE A v. STAIB OF MADHYA PRADESH SEPlEMBER 6, 1989 [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, CJ, SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, B RANGANATH MISRA, G.L. OZA, B.C. RAY, K.N. SINGH ANDS. NATARAJAN, JJ.) ) Limitation Act, 1963-First Schedule-Articles 58 and 113- ‘When the right to sue or cause of action first accrues’-Jnterpretati
Date of decision : 06-09-1989 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/207/1984 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: SABYASACHI MUKHERJI,RANGANATH MISRA,G.L. OZA,B.C. RAY,S. NATARAJAN,M.N. VENKATACHALIAH,S. RANGANATHAN
B Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 13, 14, 21, 32 Prosecution of appellant for offences under sections 161 and 165 I. P. C.-Trial under Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 to be h.eld by Special Judge only- C Supreme Court in its judgment directing trial to be held by High Court Judge-Validity of
Date of decision : 29-04-1988 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/468/1986 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: P.N. BHAGWATI,A.C. GUPTA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,V.D. TULZAPURKAR,D.A. DESAI,R.S. PATHAK,E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
. GUPTA & ORS. ETC. ETC. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC. December 28, 1981 [ P.N. BHAGWATI, A.C. GUPTA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL Au V.D. TULZAPURKAR, D.A. DESAI, R.S. PATHAK AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ. ] 365 1, Independence of Judiciary, scope and limitations of the concept-Basic. structure of th
Date of decision : 28-12-1981 | Case Number : TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL)/19/1981 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,R.S. SARKARIA,N.L. UNTWALIA,P.S. KAILASAM,V.D. TULZAPURKAR
Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 67 of 1916-Legislative C – competence of the ParliamRnt to enact Nationalisation Amendment Act Whether the Amending Act is violative oif the provisi”ons of Articles 14, 19,(1)(/), 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Constituti<>n of lndia-Applicability
Date of decision : 07-05-1980 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/111/1977 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowedJudge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,R.S. SARKARIA,N.L. UNTWALIA,P.N. SHINGAL,P.S. KAILASAM,O. CHINNAPPA REDDY,E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
Rent Control Acts-Provide conditions for eviction of tenants-Notice under s. 106 1’ransf er of Property Act if necessary after decree for eviction ‘passed -by Court. A lease between a lessor and a lessee comes into existence by way of con tract when the parties to the contract agree on the ren
Date of decision : 23-08-1979 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1301/1977 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,R.S. SARKARIA,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL
Constitution of India–Art. 143-Scope of . Special Courts Bill-Parliament if has power to enact the Bill-Whether any of its provisions violate the rights under Articles 14 and 21. The draft Special Courts Bill 1978 introduced in the Parliament by a pri~ vate member seeks to create adequate number o
Date of decision : 01-12-1978 | Case Number : SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE/1/1978 | Disposal Nature : Disposed offJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR,D.A. DESAI
gt; 207 .UANGALORE WATER-SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD, ETC. A v. R. RAJAPPA & OTHERS February 21, 1978 & April 7, 1978 * ,fM. H. BEG, C.J., Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, P. N. BHAGWATI, V. R. KRISHNA IYER, JASWANT SINGH, v. D. TULZAPURKAR AND D. A . DESAI, JJ .] “INDUSTRY” Industry in Section
Date of decision : 21-02-1978 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/753/1975 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL,JASWANT SINGH,D.A. DESAI
• .• ‘ ‘” 293 PRAG ICE & OIL MILLS & ANR. ETC. v. UNION OF INDIA February 21, 1978 & May 5, 1978 IM. H. BEG, C.J., Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, P. N. BUAGWATI, S. MuRTAZA FAZAL AI.I, P. N. SHINGHAL, JASWANT SINGH AND D. A . DESAI, JJ.) Constitutton of India, 1950, Art. 31B read wit
Date of decision : 21-02-1978 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/712/1977 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL,D.A. DESAI
334 MADAN MOHAN PATHAK v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. February 21, 1978 /~l. H. BEG, C.J., Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, 1′. N. BHAGWA’IJ, V. R. KRISHNA IYER, s. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P. N. SHINGII.\t AND D. A . DESAI, JJ.J Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlen1ent) Act, 1976-S. 3-…. Validity o
Date of decision : 21-02-1978 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/108/1976 | Disposal Nature : Case AllowedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR,D.A. DESAI
Constitution of India 1950, Arts. 54, SS, 58 and 71-Scope of Art. 58- Whether the Presidential Vice-Presidentlal Elections Act (Act 31), 1952 made under Art. 71(1) is in conflict with Art. 58. Constitution of India 1950-Article 14 whether ss. SB and SC of the Presi dential and Vice-Presidentia
Date of decision : 15-02-1978 | Case Number : ELECTION PETITION (CIVIL)/1/1977 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1978] 2 S·C·R· STATE OF KERALA v. M. K. KRISHNAN NAIR & ORS. AND K. SUKUMARAN NAIR & ANR. v. M. K. KRISHNAN NAIR & ORS. February 14, 1978 {M. H. BEG, c. J., P. N. BHAGWATI, v. R. KRISHNA lYER, s. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P. N. SHINGHAL, JASWANT SINGH
Date of decision : 14-02-1978 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2047/1974 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR
West Khandesh Mehwassl Estate (Proprietary Rights Abolition etc.) ReRulation, 1951 included in the Ninth ScheduTe as Item 155-Constitutional.’ validity is no longer open on the ~round of violation of Art 19′(1)(f), whe11 once it is included in the protective umbrella of the 1\linth Schedule. There
Date of decision : 14-02-1978 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2212/1969 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed 25Judge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.S. KAILASAM
Constitution of India Articles 14, 19 (1) ( a ) and 21-Personal liberty Whether right to go abroad is part of personal liberty-Whether a law which tomplies with Article 21 has still to meet the challenge of Article 19.-Nature and ambit of Article 14-ludging validity with reference to direct an
Date of decision : 25-01-1978 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/231/1977 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off 26Judge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.N. SHINGAL,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR
_Kerala A.r:rlculwri.fts Dl’bt Relief Act. 1970 .~. 20-Scop,· of -Section 20 clllllles .cle~ror~ t~ reco••er proputil’s .~old to rmrcllasers i11 t’.Tt’L’Iitio11 of d~crt?e passed m llqt~rclatiiiJ: the ~t·br owed by the ogriculturist-Rt•J•tricrion if reason ab/
Date of decision : 16-01-1978 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/420/1973 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.S. KAILASAM
VISHNU AGENCIES (PVT.) LTD. ETC. v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & OR’S. ETC. December 16, 1977 433 [M. H. BEG, C.J., Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, P. N. BHAGWATI, V. R. KRISHNA IYER, N. L. UNTWALIA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND P. S. KAILASAM, JJ] Sales-tax-Statutory sale-If sale for the purposes of Sales-tax Acts.
Date of decision : 16-12-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/724/1976 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,N.L. UNTWALIA,P.N. SHINGAL,JASWANT SINGH,P.S. KAILASAM
Constitution of India 1950-Art. 131-Scope of -Commission of Inquiry appointed by the Central Government under the Cornmissions of lr_iquiry 4ct, 1952 to inquire into allegations of corruption, favouritism and nepotlsm agaifl!t the Chief Minister of a State-Suit filed by the State under Art. 131-If
Date of decision : 08-11-1977 | Case Number : ORIGINAL SUIT/8/1977 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,JASWANT SINGH,P.S. KAILASAM
Constitution of .Irulid; -Article-31(2)-“Public purpose” Scope of , whether includes compulsory acquisition for Road Transport Corporation-Part acqui· sition pf undertaking, validity of -“Amount” in lieu of acquired property. quan· tum and principles of evaluation,
Date of decision : 11-10-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1085/1976 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.S. KAILASAM
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959-Ss. 37, 46, 63 validity of -Act prohibitecl collection of any sum not payable by way of sales tax or in excess of tax payable-Amounts so collected forfeited-Forfeiture, .If withili, the legislative competence of the State Le!(islature. Constitution of India, 1950-Entries
Date of decision : 31-08-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/533/1975 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.S. KAILASAM
Calcutta llnprovement Act, 1911-Sec. 78A to 78G-Whether unconstitu- r tional-If suffers from the vice of excessive delegation-RuJes 11 to 21, if 1′ ultra vires the A ct. The respondents were the owners of buildings situated in a street known as Fire Lane in the city of Calcutta. The Board of Truste
Date of decision : 06-05-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/579/1976 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,P.K. GOSWAMI,A.C. GUPTA,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Comtitution of India, 1950, Articles 131, 256, 257-Advice by Home Minister, Union oj India to Chief Minister of State dated 184-1977 to recom.. mend under Art. 163 to the Governor to dissolve Ugislative Assenzbly under Art. 174(2)(b).-Nature of the advice, whether any relief as prayed for in the su
Date of decision : 06-05-1977 | Case Number : ORIGINAL SUIT/1/1977 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,N.L. UNTWALIA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,P.S. KAILASAM
• SUPREME COURT REPORTS MISRILAL JAIN ETC. ETC. v . STATE OF ORISSA & ANOTHER May 2, 1977 (1977] 3 S.C.R. B [M. H. BEG, C.J., Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, P. N. BHAGVATI, V. R. KRISHNA !YER, N.1 L. UNTWALLA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI ANU P. S. KAILASAM, JJ.} Orissa 1axation (On goods carried by Roads or I
Date of decision : 02-05-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1810/1971 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: A.N. RAY,HANS RAJ KHANNA,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,A.C. GUPTA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
B Kera/ a State Subordinate Service Rules. 1958. r. 13AA-Constitulionnl i·afidity of . Constitution of India, 1950-Arts 16, 46 and 33S.–Scope of . Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes-if a caste-Exen1ptio11 granted frorn passing special departtnenta/ tests-if violative of Art, 16. Rule 13(
Date of decision : 19-09-1975 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1160/1974 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: A.N. RAY,HANS RAJ KHANNA,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,V.R. KRISHNA IYER,A.C. GUPTA,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Adrocates Act, 1961-Sections 37 and 38 Scope of -“Person aggrieved” if a State Bar Council could be a “person aggrieved”. The State Bar Councils created by the Advocates Act, 1961 have been en trusted v;1ith the functions inter alia of entertaining and determ!ning cases of
Date of decision : 13-08-1975 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1461/1974 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: A.N. RAY,D.G. PALEKAR,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,A. ALAGIRISWAMI,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER
AMSHER SINGH & ANR. AND STATE OF PUNJAB August 23, 1974 [ A . N. RAY, C.J., D. G. PALEKAR, K. K. MATHEW, Y. V. CHANDRAÂ CHUD, A . ALAGJRISWAMI, P. N. BHAGWATI AND v. R. KRISHNA IYER, JJ.J President and Governor~Whether fornzal heads-Whether bound ‘to act on aid and advice of Council of Minis
Date of decision : 23-08-1974 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2289/1970 | Disposal Nature : Disposed offJudge Name: A.N. RAY,P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY,D.G. PALEKAR,HANS RAJ KHANNA,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD
Constitution of India, 1950; Article 54–An electoral college consisting of ~~·~ B Constitution of India? Article 71 (4)–Disaolution of a State Legislative Assembly-Vacancy in ~le electoral college, if occurs on such dissolution. Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 54, 55 and 62-Election
Date of decision : 05-06-1974 | Case Number : SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE/1/1974 | Disposal Nature : Reference answeredJudge Name: A.N. RAY,D.G. PALEKAR,HANS RAJ KHANNA,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,A. ALAGIRISWAMI,P.N. BHAGWATI,V.R. KRISHNA IYER
A MAGANLAL CHHAGGANLAL (P) LTD. v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY & ORS . April 11, 1974 B rA. N. RAY, C.J., D. G. PALEKAR, H. R. KHANNA, K. K. MATHEW, A . ALAGIRISWAMI, P. N. BHAGWATI AND V. R. KRISHNA IYER, JJ.J c D E F G Consrit”tion of Jndfa, 1950, A.rt. 14-Provision in the Bo
Date of decision : 11-04-1974 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/680/1968 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: J.M. SHELAT,K.S. HEGDE,A.N. RAY,P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY,HANS RAJ KHANNA,A.K. MUKHERJEA,Y.V. CHANDRACHUD
The Mllillfe11ance of Internal Security Act, (26 of 1971), s. 17A-lf violates Art. 14 and Art. 22(7) of the Constitution. Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 22(4)( a ) and (b) of Art. 22(1)-Scope of . Practice-Scope of Supreme Court’s Power to review its earlier decisions. The ~1aintenance of Intern
Date of decision : 19-04-1973 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)/266/1972 | Disposal Nature : Case AllowedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,D.G. PALEKAR,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,S.N. DWIVEDI
. ‘ • A B c D E F G H 39 NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANOTHER v . VITHAL RAO AND OTHERS December 11, 1972 [S, M. SIKRI, C. J., J.M. SHELAT, A . N. RAY, D.-0. PALEKAR, M. H. BEG, S. N. DWIVEDI AND I. D. DUA, JJ.J . Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 and Land Requisition Act 1894 -Different terms
Date of decision : 11-12-1972 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2139/1968 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,D.G. PALEKAR,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG,S.N. DWIVEDI
DARMAL LALWANI A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. December 11, 1972 [S. M. SIKRI, C. J., J. M. SHELAT, A . N. RAY, D. G. PALEKAR, M. H. BEG, S. N. DWIVEDI AND I. D. DUA, JJ.J B Land Acquisition Act, 1894 amended by Land Acquisition (Mttdhya Pradesh Amendment) Act 5 of 1959-Compensation for land
Date of decision : 11-12-1972 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/646/1970 | Disposal Nature : Case AllowedJudge Name: J.M. SHELAT,A.N. RAY,P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY,D.G. PALEKAR,HANS RAJ KHANNA,KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG
Comtitution of India, 1950-Articles 14 & 16-Equalily of opportu· nity in 11w.tters of promotion-Purljab Educational Service C.Provincialised Cadre) Class Ill Rules, 1961-Validity-Schools run by Local Bodies and teachers taken over by government in 1957-Teachers given same scales of pay a
Date of decision : 05-05-1972 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/97/1970 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,D.G. PALEKAR,HANS RAJ KHANNA,M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG
BARI SINGH AND ORS. v. THE MILITARY ESTATE OFFICER AND ANR. May 3, 1972 [S. M. Snou, C.J., J. M. SHELAT, A . N. RAY, I. D. DuA, D. G. B PALEKAR, H. R. KHANNA AND M. H. BEG, JJ.J c D E I! G H Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, ( 15 of 1971), ss. 15 and 20-Validation of eviction
Date of decision : 03-05-1972 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/493/1967 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,G.K. MITTER,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,SUBIMAL CHANDRA ROY,D.G. PALEKAR
• Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1951 as amended by Mysore Act II of 1961- Levy of purchase tax on sugarcane purchased by factories from grower. Purchase and supply of sugarcane regu/IJted by Central and State Control Orders-Transactions whether amounted to sale within meaning of 1. 2(/) of Mysore
Date of decision : 01-11-1971 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2002/1968 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,G.K. MITTER,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,SUBIMAL CHANDRA ROY,D.G. PALEKAR
Constillltion of India, 1950, Arts. 246, 248, List /, Sev~ntlz. Schedule, entries 86 and 97, and List JI, entry 49-Scope of -;-:Enqllll’Y uzto sc~pe of residuary powers-Nature of -‘An}’ other niatter ill entry 97, n1ea111ng of . Wealth Tax Act, 1957, as amended by s. 24, Finance Ac_t, 1969- Comvete
Date of decision : 21-10-1971 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2172/1970 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: S.M. SIKRI,J.M. SHELAT,G.K. MITTER,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA,SUBIMAL CHANDRA ROY,D.G. PALEKAR
Constitution of India, 1950, Arts. 31-B, 39 and Ninth Schedule and Seventh Schedule, List I/, entry 18 and List /l/, entry 42 Madras Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961-Struck down as vio· !ative of Art,, 14-Act included in Ninth Schedule-Effect on va/idity Whe:ther Sta
Date of decision : 11-10-1971 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/247/1967 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.M. SHELAT,VISHISHTHA BHARGAVA,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA
Code of Criminal Procedure (5 of 1898), ·” 144 and C/ui(Jier VIII-I.• 1io/e1tfre of Art. 19 of Constitution, On the questions : (I) Whether s. 144 and. 1 2) Ch. Vil! of the Cri minal Procedure Code, 1898, violated Art. 19(al. (bl. (c) and (d) ot the Constitution, HELD (By Full
Date of decision : 28-10-1970 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/77/1970 | Disposal Nature : Directions issuedJudge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.M. SHELAT,VISHISHTHA BHARGAVA,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA
\/. BHARGAVA, 1’c RAY ANIJ Code of Crbninal Procedure, 1898, s. 344–Magistrate reniandiug arrested person to judicial custody-Further remand lvhefl not nurde in presence of prisoner whether illegal. R was arrested on August 20, 1970 under ss. 107/117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and was reman
Date of decision : 11-09-1970 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/330/1970 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.M. SHELAT,VISHISHTHA BHARGAVA,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,A.N. RAY,I.D. DUA
V. BHARGAVA, N. RAY AND Supreme Court-Language of court is Eng/lsh-I’ntervener seeking permission to argue in Hindi-Such permis~ion, could not be exterttkd when counsel on both sides and several members of Bench could not follow argumelt/s in Hindi-Alternatives .mggested by court not accepted C by
Date of decision :Â 10-09-1970Â | Case Number :Â WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/307/1970Â 50Judge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI,R.S. BACHAWAT,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,K.S. HEGDE
S. M. S1KRI, VAIDIALINGAM Bombay Tenancy and Agric11/t11ra/ Lands Act (Hom. Act 67 of 1948) as a1ncnded by /Jo111bay Act 13 of 1956, s. 65-JV/lethcr co11/rrs arbitrary naked pOH’.er-/f u/1ra vi res- A rt. 31 A ( l) (b) oj c:o11stitu1ion–:VJanagr- 1nent for limited period-Scope of -Act a1nended aft
Date of decision : 19-04-1968 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1751/1966 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI,R.S. BACHAWAT,G.K. MITTER,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM,K.S. HEGDE
Constitution ‘ of Jndic, 1950, Art. JIB-Maharashtra Act 13 of 1962 amending the Maharashtra State Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Hold ings) Act (27 of 1961)-1961 Act mentioned In Ninth Schedule, but not amending Act-Amending Act if protected by Art, JIB-Seventeenth Amendment, if valid-Entry 35
Date of decision : 10-04-1968 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2239/1966 | Disposal Nature : Disposed offJudge Name: K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI,V. RAMASWAMI,J.M. SHELAT,C.A. VAIDYIALINGAM
D E F G H MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. BIRLA COTION, SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS, DELHI AND ANOTHER February 23, 1968 [K. N. WANCHOO, C.J., M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH, S. M. S!KRI, V. RAMASWAMI, J.M. SHELAT AND C. A . VAIDIAL!NGAM, JJ.j Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 66 of 1951 ss. 113 and 150
Date of decision : 23-02-1968 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1857/1967 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,R.S. BACHAWAT,V. RAMASWAMI,G.K. MITTER,K.S. HEGDE
c·a,,stit111ion of India Arts. J3l2). 14, 21, 22, 31, 106 anci 359(1) H’hether an order 1nade 11nder Art. 359(1) is a ‘/a1v’ lvitlrin lhe 1neauing of A ;·t. 13(2)-1/ it can he rested against futt:lt:111ental righiS in Part 111 including the fundcunental right the enforce111ent of
Date of decision : 10-11-1967 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/109/1967 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,R.S. BACHAWAT,V. RAMASWAMI,G.K. MITTER,K.S. HEGDE
D E F G H ‘ STRAW PRODUCTS LTD. v. INCOME-TAX OFFI~ER, BHOPAL & ORS. ‘ October 20, 1967 [K. N. WANcHoo, c.J., M. HrnAYATULLAH; -J:-e:–sa\tt, R. S. BACHAWAT, V. R/iMASWAMl, G. K. M!TTE 0 R AND K. S. HEGDE, JJ.) Taxation Laws (Extension, to Merged .States 1/11d A111end11ien1) 4,., 67 of 1949, s.
Date of decision : 20-10-1967 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/303/1967 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K.N. WANCHOO,J.C. SHAH,RAGHUBAR DAYAL,S.M. SIKRI,R.S. BACHAWAT,V. RAMASWAMI
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946 (5 of 1946), s. 1~Suits to clwl/engc assessments 1nade under Act and rules made :hereunder barred-‘Outside’ sales wrongly assessed as ‘inside’ sales–Suil lo recover tax wrongly charg ed whether lies .. The appellant, a public limited company manufacturing and sellin
Date of decision : 23-04-1965 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/481/1963 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI,R.S. BACHAWAT
Indian Income-tax Act (11 of 1922), s. 66(4)-Power of High Court to mk Tribunal to submit supplementary statement of case after further investigation of facts-Stare decisis-Power of Supreme Court to review and revise earlier judgments-‘W_hen should be exercised. The appellant was a company register
Date of decision : 08-02-1965 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1017/1963 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
SPECIAL REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 1964 September 30, 1964. (P. B. G;.JENDRAGADKAR, C.J., A . K. SARKAR, K. SunA RAo, K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. C. SHAH B AND N. R.AJAGOPALA AYYANGAR JJ.) c D E F G H ConJtitution of India, Art. 143(1)-Reference under, whether mUJt relate to matterJ pertaining to Pre
Date of decision : 30-09-1964 | Case Number : SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE/1/1964 | Disposal Nature : Reference answeredJudge Name: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,K. SUBBA RAO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,RAGHUBAR DAYAL,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR,J.R. MUDHOLKAR
R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS be for the detenu to show that the order bad gone beyond 1964 the needs of the situation and was therefore contrary to s. 44. a . s. Paruldar No such thing bas been shown in the present cases and we s 1 v.M_L . fi d h b d . . . b .d tale 0 anara-are satis e t at t e or ers m
Date of decision : 30-01-1964 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/182/1963 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
— • I 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 683 MOTI RAM DEKA ETC. l’. GENERAL MANAGER, N.E.F. RAILWAYS, MALIGAON, PANDU, ETC. (With connected appeals) (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, K.N. WANCHOO, M. HJDAYATULLAH K.C. DAS GUPTA, J.C. SHAH AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR JJ.) Civil Service-Terminatio
Date of decision : 05-12-1963 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/711/1962 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed 60
Judge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH
C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS MAK.HAN SINGH fl. STATE OF PUNJAB (AND CONNECTED APPEALS) (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A . K. SARKAR, K. SuBBA RAo, K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, K. c. DAS GUPTA AND J. c. SHAH, JJ.) Constitution of India, 1950, Arts. 352 and 359-Proclamation of emergency-President’s order res
Date of decision : 02-09-1963 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/80/1963 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed | Direction Issue : Proclamation of emergency61
Judge Name: S.K. DAS,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,K.C. DAS GUPTA,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
. P. Kapur v. Pratap Singh Kairon and Otht:rs Das Gupta J. 1963 Aug11st, 2 224 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1964] the Inquiries Act would amount to contempt of the crimi nal court, we are clearly of opinion that it is wholly un desirable that the enquiry under the Inquiries Act should be held at
Date of decision : 02-08-1963 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/75/1963 | Disposal Nature : Directions issuedJudge Name: S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR,J.R. MUDHOLKAR
7S SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1963] SMT. UJJAM BAI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (S. K. D.As, J. L. KAPUR, A . K. SARKAR. K. SUBB.A R.Ao, M. HID.AY.ATULLAH, N. RAJ.AGOPALA AYY.ANGAR and J. R.MUDHOLKAR, JJ.) Fundamental Right, Enforcement of -Assessment by Sales Tax Officer under a valid Act-If open to chall
Date of decision : 28-04-1962 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/79/1959 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR,J.R. MUDHOLKAR
R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 991 M/S. CHHOTABHAIJETHABHAI PATEL & CO. v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (S. K. DAS, J. L. KAPUR, A . K. SARKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, M. llIDAYATULLAH, N. RAJAGOPALA.. AYYA.NGAR a ~d J. R. MuDHOLKAR, JJ.) Sales·tax-:Notification by State Government exempting ltand-made biris–
Date of decision : 10-04-1962 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/195/1959 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR,J.R. MUDHOLKAR
R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 491 THE AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT (RAJASTHAN) LTD. v. THE STATE OF RA.JASTHAN AND OTHERS (And Connected Appeals) (S. K. DAS, J. L. KAPUR, A . k. SARKAR, K. SUBBA. RAO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR and J. R. MUDHOLKAR1 JJ.) Fre~om of Trade-State carriages-Tax on Vehicle
Date of decision : 09-04-1962 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/42/1959 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
R. SUPREME COuRT REPoRTS 391 tenant, the entry being “Tekan and others, Gairmau rasian first through G~neshi Gair Maurasi second half. The appellant is thus a tenant of the land of which he has taken lease and cannot be a landowner. keeping in view the definition of that term in the A
Date of decision : 23-02-1962 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/133/1958 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,J.L. KAPUR,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K. SUBBA RAO,K.N. WANCHOO,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH
PREME COURT REPORTS [1961] r960 the question will now be answered in the negative. As already stated, there is no need to answer the second The Conirnissioner . h’ h d t · . of Juconie-tax, question, W lC OeS IlO arl~e. Bambay The appeal is allowed with costs here and in the v. High Court. Jl
Date of decision : 01-12-1960 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/37/1995 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: SUDHI RANJAN DAS,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR,BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,SYED JAFFER IMAM,S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR
ll; S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 995 We ought to add that in our calq,ulations we have not I959 taken into account the Bhupendra Factory because The Associated,: the relevant material for working out the figures in Cement regard to this factory is not adequate or satisfactory. companies Ltd. However
Date of decision : 22-05-1958 | Case Number : SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE/1/1958 | Disposal Nature : Reference answeredJudge Name: SUDHI RANJAN DAS,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,SYED JAFFER IMAM,S.K. DAS,J.L. KAPUR,P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,A.K. SARKAR
SUPREME COURT REPORTS. 1081 NARAYAN BHASKAR KHARE v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA (and connected petition) (S. R. DAS c. J., BHAGWATI, JAFER IMAM, s. K. DAS, J. L. KAPUR, GAJENDRAGADKAR and A . K. SARKAR JJ.) President, Election of -Doubts and Disputes relating to such election-Jurisdiction and
Date of decision : 03-05-1957 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/63/1957 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR,BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,SYED JAFFER IMAM
R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 603 THE BENGAL IMMUNITY COMPANY LIMITED ”· THE ST ATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS. (S. R. DAs, ACTING C.J., VIVIAN BosE, BHAGWATI, ]AGANNADHADAS, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. P. SINHA and JAFER IMAM JJ.] Constitution of India-Arts. 141, 226, 286(1), (2) and (3)-Art. 286(J)( a ) rea
Date of decision : 06-09-1955 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/159/1953 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
:s.c.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1135 227. A.s a result of our decision, the Election Commis ·sion will now proceed to hold a fresh election. This appeal must accordingly be allowed, the deci sions of the High Court and the Tribunal quashed .and the whole election set aside. The partie
Date of decision :Â 10-12-1954Â | Case Number :Â CIVIL APPEAL/105/1953Â 71
Judge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
ecember 9 1104 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [19551 HARI VISHNU KAMA TH ti, SYED AHMAD ISHAQUE AND OTHERS. [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN C. J., MuKHERJEA, S. R. DAs, V1v1AN BosE, BHAGWATI, JAGANNADHADAS AND VENKATARAMA AYYAR JJ.] Constitution of India, Art. 226-Powers of High Court there under-Writ of certiorari
Date of decision : 09-12-1954 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/61/1954 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
iddot; – – S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1065 CAPTAIN GANP ATI SINGHJI o. THE STATE OF AJMER AND ANOTHER. [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN C. J., MuKHERJEA, S. R. DAs, VIVIAN BosE, BHAGWATI, JAGANNADHADAS and V:ENKATARAMA AYYAR JJ.] Ajmer Laws Regulation of 1877 (Reg. III of 1877), s. 40- Chief Commissioner empower
Date of decision : 03-12-1954 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/43/1954 | Disposal Nature : Amount AwardedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
‘ • :S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1045 held against the appellant on this contention. The 1earned Judges of the High Court were of the opinion that as the execution and attestation took place at one sitting at the residence of P.W. 1, where the testa tor and the witnesses had assembled by
Date of decision : 02-12-1954 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/83/1953 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,B. JAGANNADHADAS,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1011 to stand as a candidate for election he shall not either be employed as a paid legal practitioner on behalf of the municipality or act as a legal practitioner against the Municipality. There is no fundamental right in any person to stand as a candidate for election
Date of decision : 25-11-1954 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/90/1953 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,VIVIAN BOSE,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
akshminarayan Ram Gopal and Son Ltd. v. 408 ‘ SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1955] ·rhe Government of Hyderabad. concerns besides the Company. All these factors taken mto consideration along with the fixity of tenure, the nature of remuneration and the assignability of their rights, are sufficient to
Date of decision : 22-04-1954 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/129/1952 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowedJudge Name: MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,VIVIAN BOSE,GHULAM HASAN,NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI,T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR
SUPREME COURT i,EPORTS 1005 existed in the other parts of Rajasthan. This difference between the two parts did not justify that such pro gressive and ameliorative measures for the welfare of the people existing in a particular area should be done away with and the State be brought down to the
Date of decision : 16-03-1954 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/38/1953 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR,VIVIAN BOSE
R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 435 bona fide, even if good faith can be held to be a defence at all in a proceeding for contempt. What is more, he did not express any regret for what he had done either in the High Court or before us and his behaviour Joes not show the least trace of contrition. In these c
Date of decision : 27-02-1952 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/15/1951 | Direction Issue : Preliminary objection overruledJudge Name: M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR,VIVIAN BOSE
/<1n. 11 284 SUPREME COURT REPORTS . [1952) THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL v. ANWAR ALI SARKAR HABIB MOHAMED, I THE STATE OF HYDERABAD, and J· THE STATE OF MYSORE THE ST A TE OF WEST BENGAL fl. GAJAN MALI lntervcners. [PATANJALI SAs’i’RI C.J., FAZL Au, MEim CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA, DAs, CHANDRA
Date of decision : 11-01-1952 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/297/1951 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA,M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,VIVIAN BOSE
C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 747 In re THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERW ARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STATES (LAWS) ACT, 1950. · [SHRI HARILAL KANIA, C. J., FAZL Au, PATANJALI SAsTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHEllJEA, DAs AND BosE JJ.] Delhi Laws Act, 1912, s. 7-Ajmer~M
Date of decision :Â 23-05-1951Â | Case Number :Â SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE/1/1951Â 80
Judge Name: HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA,M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,VIVIAN BOSE
C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE STATE OF MADRAS “· SRIMATHl CHAMPAKAM DORAIRAJAN and THE STATE OF MADRAS ti. C. R. SRINIVASAN [Sm1 HAlllLAL KANIA C. J. FAZL Au, PATANJALI SASTU, M&Hll. CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHUJEA, S. R. DAS and VMAN BosE JJ.] 525 Constitution of India, Arts. 13, 16 (4), 2
Date of decision : 09-04-1951 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/270/1951 | Disposal Nature : DismissedJudge Name: HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA,M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,VIVIAN BOSE
PREME COURT REPORTS [1951) 1051 of the village, their rights under the custom should Ram Doon LU r.ev~ve as soon as. the rive~ come~ .down within the amt other. limits of mouza S1kha. This position certainly has v. got to be admitted but as we are concerned with the Radh’ Sham state of affair£
Date of decision : 09-04-1951 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/35/1951Judge Name: HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA,M. PATANJALI SASTRI,MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN,BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA,SUDHI RANJAN DAS,SIR SYED FAZL ALI,N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR
… 22 228 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1951] KESHAVAN MADHAVA MENON “· THE STATE OF BOMBAY [Smu HAru1.AL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL Au, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHEJEA, DAs and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 13 (!)-Whether retrospective Prosecution fo
Date of decision :Â 22-01-1951Â | Case Number :Â CIVIL APPEAL//1951Â | Disposal Nature :Â Dismissed
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.