Topics

• Yashpal Vs Sushila:12 Apex Court Directions for Speedy Trial
• Insurer assumes fiduciary duty to act in good faith and commitment
• Geetha Vs. Nanjundaswamy: Plaint cannot be rejected in part (O7-R11)

---

• Yashpal Vs Sushila:12 Apex Court Directions for Speedy Trial - Fixing of the date of trial shall be in consultation with the learned advocates appearing for the parties to enable them to adjust their calendar. Once the date of trial is fixed, the trial should proceed accordingly to the extent possible, on day-to-day basis.
• Jaiveer Singh Vs Uttarakhand (28/11/2023) - Prescribed eligibility qualification for admission to a course or for recruitment to or promotion in service are matters to be considered by the appropriate authority-Judicial review can neither expand the ambit of the prescribed qualifications nor decide the equivalence of the prescribed qualifications with any other given qualification. Equivalence of qualification is a matter for the State, as recruiting authority, to determine.
• Ajmal Kasab Vs Maharashtra (29/08/2012) - The appellant was convicted and sentenced to death as noted above (vide judgment and order dated May 3/6,2010 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 175 of 2009). The judgment by the trial court gave rise to a reference to the Bombay High Court under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC), registered as Confirmation Case No. 2 of 2010.

---

---