Whether respondent -accused can be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC r/w Section 149 IPC when the deceased died due to septicemia after a period of thirty days
Tag: JUDGMENTS
Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors-21/02/2022
Court has power of grant of compensation in the case of violation of Fundamental Rights.
K. Shanthamma Vs. State of Telangana-21/02/2022
The offence under Section 7 of the PC Act relating to public servants taking bribe requires a demand of illegal gratification and the acceptance thereof. The proof of demand of bribe by a public servant and its acceptance by him is sine quo non for establishing the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act
Babu Venkatesh and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Anr-18/02/2022
Section 156(3) CrPC- applications under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. are to be supported by an affidavit duly sworn by the complainant who seeks the invocation of the jurisdiction of the Magistrate
Hotel Priya, A Proprietorship Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors-18/02/2022
DANCE BAR-whenever challenges arise, particularly based on gender, it is the task of the judges to scrutinize closely, whether, if and the extent to which the impugned practices or rules or norms are rooted in historical prejudice, gender stereotypes and paternalism.
Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC & Ors-15/02/2022
Before we deal with the issue at hand, it may be necessary to recount brief facts. Aggrieved by the sale transaction between Future Retail Limited (FRL)Reliance Group, Amazon initiated an arbitration proceeding before the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), in terms of Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. (FCPL)Amazon agreements.
Manoj @ Monu @ Vishal Chaudhary Vs. State of Haryana & Anr-15/02/2022
Juvenile Justice-Question of Juvenility-The plea of juvenility has to be raised in a bonafide and truthful manner. If the reliance is on a document to seek juvenility which is not reliable or dubious in nature, the appellant cannot be treated to be juvenile keeping in view that the Act is a beneficial legislation.
Satye Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand-15/02/2022
EVIDENCE-It is settled position of law that circumstances howsoever strong cannot take place of proof and that the guilt of the accused have to be proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.
Jogi Ram Vs. Suresh Kumar & Ors -01/02/2022
where a widow gets a share in the property under a preliminary decree before or at the time when the 1956 Act had been passed but had not been given actual possession under a final decree, the property would be deemed to be possessed by her and by force of s. 14(1) she would get absolute interest. in the property.
Vasudev Vs State of Madhya Pradesh-01/02/2022
As the use of the gun itself is not established by the FSL report, therefore, the conviction under Section 27 Arms Act also is not justified. Considering all these aspects, in our considered opinion, the ingredients of Section 307/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act have not been proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt, proving the guilt of the accused/appellant.
Arjun Gopal vs Union Of India-29/10/2021
On Diwali days or on any other festivals like Gurupurab, etc., when such fireworks generally take place, it would strictly be from 8.00 p.m. till 10.00 p.m. only. On Christmas eve and New Year's eve, when such fireworks start around midnight i.e. 12.00 a.m., it would be from 11.55 p.m. till 12.30 a.m. only.
Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. Union of India and Ors-27/10/2021
Pegasus suite of spywares-we constitute a Technical Committee comprising of three members, including those who are experts in cyber security, digital forensics, networks and hardware, whose functioning will be overseen by Justice R.V. Raveendran,
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr-29/09/2021
GRANTING BAIL-The issue of bail is one of liberty, justice, public safety and burden of the public treasury, all of which insist that a developed jurisprudence of bail is integral to a socially sensitised judicial process
Vishwabandhu Vs. Sri Krishna and Anr-29/09/2021
MONEY SUIT-Ex Party Decree-Execution-Notice- when a notice is sent by registered post and is returned with a postal endorsement "refused" or "not available in the house" or "house locked" or "shop closed" or "addressee not in station", due service has to be presumed.
Suraz India Trust Vs. Union of India-29/09/2021
CONTEMPT OF COURT- Court has held that an apology cannot be a defence, a justification can be accepted if it can be ignored without compromising the dignity of the Court
Advocatetanmoy Law Library 