Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
10/04/2026
  • Law

Abhishek Banerjee vs Soumen Nandy and Ors (28/04/2023)

Having considered the transcript, we direct that the Acting Chief Justice of the High Court at Calcutta shall reassign the pending proceedings in the case to some other Judge of the Calcutta High Court. The Judge to whom the proceedings are reassigned by the Acting Chief Justice would be at liberty to take up all applications which may be moved in that regard.
advtanmoy 30/04/2023 4 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Supreme Court

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป Law ยป Abhishek Banerjee vs Soumen Nandy and Ors (28/04/2023)

ITEM NO.14 + 46

COURT NO.1

SECTION XVI

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • ย Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 15883/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-04-2023
in CAN No. 1/2023 passed by the High Court at Calcutta)

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • ย Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

ABHISHEK BANERJEE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SOUMEN NANDY & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.81269/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT and IA No.81270/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
No.81266/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA
No.81265/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/
ANNEXURES )

WITH
Diary No 15889/2023

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • ย Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

KUNTAL GHOSH Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No 80074/2023 โ€“ Exemption from
filing C/C of the impugned judgment and IA No 80073/2023 โ€“
Permission to file the Special Leave Petition)

Date : 28-04-2023

This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

For Petitioner(s)

Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
Mr. Amit Bhandari, Adv.
Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv.
Ms. Shreya Bhojnagarwala, Adv.
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR
Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv.
Ms. Samten Doma Lachungpa, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv.
Ms. Kshitij Singh, Adv.
Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General
Mr. S.V. Raju, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.
Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv.
Ms. Sairica Raju, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv.

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rauf Rahim, AOR
Mr. Firdous Samim, Adv.
Ms. Gopa Biswas, Adv.
Mr. Bikram Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Sudipto Dasgupta, Adv.
Mr. Ali Asghar Rahim, Adv.
Ms. Payal Shoma, Adv.
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR
Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv.
Ms. Manya Hasija, Adv.
Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. Nihar Dharmadhikari, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1 Permission to file the Special Leave Petitions is granted.

2 Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 24 April 2023, the Registry has placed an affidavit dated 27 April, 2023 filed by the Registrar General of the High Court at Calcutta on the record. Paragraph 5 of the affidavit of the Registrar General states, thus :

โ€œIt is stated that on April 26, 2023 at about 07.00 p.m., His
Lordship, Honโ€™ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay has been pleased
to forward a note prepared by His Lordship in respect of annexure-
P7, transcript version of the interview โ€œGhanta-Khanek Songe
Sumanโ€ as prepared by the Interpreting Officer (Court) of High
Court, Calcutta (Original Side) pursuant to His Lordshipโ€™s direction,
along with a CD containing the interview which was proadcasted
on ABP Ananda, are annexed herewith as Annexure-A, B and C
respectively and be treated as a part of this affidavit.โ€

2 We have considered the note prepared by Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay in respect of Annexure-P7 and have also perused the transcript of the interview. The transcript has been authenticated on 26 April 2023 by the Interpreting Officer (Court) on the Original side of the High Court at Calcutta.

3 Having considered the transcript, we direct that the Acting Chief Justice of the High Court at Calcutta shall reassign the pending proceedings in the case to some other Judge of the Calcutta High Court. The Judge to whom the proceedings are reassigned by the Acting Chief Justice would be at liberty to take up all applications which may be moved in that regard.

4 The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly disposed of.

5 A copy of this order shall be communicated by the Secretary General of this Court to the Registrar General of the High Court at Calcutta so that it can be placed before the Chief Justice on the administrative side.

6 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA)

(SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR


Tags: Calcutta High Court

Post navigation

Previous: State of West Bengal vs Suvendu Adhikari and Ors (28/04/2023)
Next: Bangladesh Hindu Dharmiya Kalyan Trust Aain (2018)-เฆนเฆฟเฆจเงเฆฆเงเฆงเฆฐเงเฆฎเง€เงŸ เฆ•เฆฒเงเฆฏเฆพเฆฃ เฆŸเงเฆฐเฆพเฆธเงเฆŸ เฆ†เฆ‡เฆจ เงจเงฆเงงเงฎ
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates