ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Home ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป National ยป Supreme Court’s Immunity Ruling: Biden’s Concern for Democracy

Supreme Court’s Immunity Ruling: Biden’s Concern for Democracy

oe-Biden-USA-President
The President addressed the nation, expressing concern over the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity. He emphasized the danger of unlimited presidential power and criticized the potential implications for the country's democracy. Recalling the events of January 6th, he urged the American people to consider the impact of Donald Trump's actions and highlighted the importance of character in defining presidential power. The President expressed his commitment to respecting the limits of presidential power, echoing Justice Sotomayor's dissent and calling for the protection of democracy.

President Biden on the Supreme Courtโ€™s Immunity Ruling

July 01, 2024

Cross Hall

7:45 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Good evening. 

The presidency is the most powerful office in the world.  Itโ€™s an office that not only tests your judgment, perhaps even more importantly itโ€™s an office that can test your character because you not only face moments where you need the courage to exercise the full power of the presidency, you also face moments where you need the wisdom to respect the limits of the power of the office of the presidency.

This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America.  Each โ€” each of us is equal before the law.  No one โ€” no one is above the law, not even the president of the United States. 

With todayโ€™s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed.ย  For all โ€” for all practical purposes, todayโ€™s decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.ย 

This is a fundamentally new principle, and itโ€™s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even including the Supreme Court of the United States.  The only limits will be self-imposed by the president alone.

This decision today has continued the Courtโ€™s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights and civil rights to taking away a womanโ€™s right to choose to todayโ€™s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation.

Nearly four years ago, my predecessor sent a violent mob to the U.S. Capitol to stop the peaceful transfer of power.  We all saw it with our own eyes.  We sat there and watched it happen that day.  Attack on the police.  The ransacking of the Capitol.  A mob literally hunting down the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.  Gallows erected to hang the vice president, Mike Pence.  I think itโ€™s fair to say it was one of the darkest days in the history of America.

Now the man who sent that mob to the U.S. Capitol is facing potential criminal conviction for what happened that day.  And the American people deserve to have an answer in the courts before the upcoming election.  The public has a right to know the answer about what happened on January 6th before they ask to vote again this year.

Now, because of todayโ€™s decision, that is highly, highly unlikely.  Itโ€™s a terrible disservice to the people of this nation.

So, now โ€” now the American people have to do what the Court should have been willing to do but would not.  The America people have to render a judgment about Donald Trumpโ€™s behavior.  The American people must decide whether Donald Trumpโ€™s assault on our democracy on January 6th makes him unfit for public office in the highest office in the land.  The American people must decide if Trumpโ€™s embrace of violence to preserve his power is acceptable. 

Perhaps most importantly, the American people must decide if they want to entrust the president โ€” once again, the presidency to Donald Trump, now knowing heโ€™ll be even more emboldened to do whatever he pleases whenever he wants to do it.

You know, at the outset of our nation, it was the character of George Washington, our first president, that defined the presidency.  He believed power was limited, not absolute, and that power would always reside with the people โ€” always.

Now, over 200 years later, with todayโ€™s Supreme Court decision, once again it will depend on the character of the men and women who hold that presidency that are going to define the limits of the power of the presidency, because the law will no longer do it.

I know I will respect the limits of the presidential power, as I have for three and a half years.  But any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law. 

I concur with Justice Sotomayorโ€™s dissent today.  She โ€” hereโ€™s what she said.  She said, โ€œIn every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.  With fear for our democracy, I dissent,โ€ end of quote.

So should the American people dissent.  I dissent. 

May God bless you all.  And may God help preserve our democracy.  Thank you.  And may God protect our troops.

7:49 P.M. EDT