Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
05/04/2026
  • News

Indian Supreme Court got third woman judge after R Bhanumathi and Indu Malhotra

advtanmoy 06/08/2018 3 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Indira Banerjee

Home » Law Library Updates » Sarvarthapedia » News » Indian Supreme Court got third woman judge after R Bhanumathi and Indu Malhotra

Collegium Recommendation

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court.

Read Next

  • EU to Transfer €1.4 Billion from Frozen Russian Assets to Ukraine
  • US Permits Russian Tanker Carrying 730,000 Barrels of Oil to Cuba
  • Modi Addresses West Asia Crisis in Lok Sabha: India’s Energy and Security Strategy

Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 22 Judges, leaving 09 clear vacancies.

After extensive discussion and deliberations, the Collegium unanimously resolves to fill up, for the present, three of these vacancies. One of these vacancies is going to be filled up in terms of our recommendation for elevation of Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, which has separately been reiterated by us today.

The Collegium discussed names of Chief Justices and senior puisne High Court Judges eligible for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court.

The Collegium considers that at present the following persons are more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India:

Read Next

  • EU to Transfer €1.4 Billion from Frozen Russian Assets to Ukraine
  • US Permits Russian Tanker Carrying 730,000 Barrels of Oil to Cuba
  • Modi Addresses West Asia Crisis in Lok Sabha: India’s Energy and Security Strategy

  1. Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, Chief Justice, Madras High Court (PHC: Calcutta)
    2. Mr. Justice Vineet Saran, Chief Justice, Orissa High Court (PHC: Allahabad)

While recommending the name of Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Mr. Justice Vineet Saran, the Collegium has taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apart from their merit and integrity.

We, therefore, recommend that Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Mr. Justice Vineet Saran, be appointed as Judges in the Supreme Court of India.

Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee was appointed as a Judge of the Calcutta High Court on 5 th February, 2002 and was transferred to Delhi High Court on 8th August, 2016. She was elevated as Chief Justice of Madras High Court on 5 th April, 2017 and has been functioning there since then. She stands at Sl. No.4 in the combined seniority of High
Court Judges on all-India basis.

Read Next

  • EU to Transfer €1.4 Billion from Frozen Russian Assets to Ukraine
  • US Permits Russian Tanker Carrying 730,000 Barrels of Oil to Cuba
  • Modi Addresses West Asia Crisis in Lok Sabha: India’s Energy and Security Strategy

Mr. Justice Vineet Saran was appointed as a Judge of the Allahabad High Court on 14th February, 2002 and was transferred to Karnataka High Court on 16th February, 2015. He was elevated as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court on 26th February, 2016 and has been
functioning there since then. He stands at Sl. No.5 in the combined seniority of High Court Judges on all-India basis.

In view of the foregoing, the Collegium resolves to recommend that appointments be made in the following order:

  1. Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, and
  2. Mr. Justice Vineet Saran.

( Dipak Misra ), C.J.I.
( Ranjan Gogoi ), J.
( Madan B. Lokur ), J.
( Kurian Joseph ), J.
( A.K. Sikri ), J.

New Delhi,
July 16, 2018.

Post navigation

Previous: Delhi High Court quashed AAP govt.’s notification revising minimum wages on 4 th August 2018
Next: India does not have structured sentencing guidelines : Supreme Court Observed
Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Sarvarthapedia
Sarvarthapedia

Research Methodology and Investigation: Concepts, Frameworks, and Emerging Trends

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

West Bengal Court-Fees Act, 1970: Fees, Schedules, and Procedures

WB Land Reforms Tribunal Act 1997: History, Features, Provisions, Structure, Powers and Functions

Civil Procedure Law of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1976)

Knowledge Management in the Modern Era: From History to Digital Transformation

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia, Law and Legal Materials

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

Indian Government

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Sarvarthapedia

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Education

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates