Pension – Page 2 – Advocatetanmoy Law Library

DEOKINANDAN PRASAD Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon June 4, 2019in Supreme Court Judgments

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ( Before : S. M. Sikri, C.J; P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J; I. D. Dua, J; G. K. Mitter, J; C. A. Vaidyialingam, J ) DEOKINANDAN PRASAD — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND…

D.S. NAKARA AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – 17/12/1982

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon June 4, 2019June 30, 2019in Supreme Court Judgments

Do pensioners entitled to receive superannuation or retiring pension under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 ('1972 Rules' for short) form a class as a whole? Is the date of retirement a relevant consideration for eligibility when a revised formula…

Freedom fighters’ pension

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon February 10, 2019February 10, 2019in CIVIL

During the Silver Jubilee year of independence, a central scheme for grant of pension to freedom fighters and their eligible dependants was introduced by the Government of India with effect from 15th August 1972. The said scheme was further liberalized…

Ex-gratia Payment to West Bengal Govt. Pensioners, 2018

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon September 22, 2018in CIVIL

To provide some relief to the State Government Pensioners during the ensuing festivals, the Governor has been pleased to decide that all State Government Pensioners including the holders of provisional pension who retired prior to 30.9.2017 and also the pensioners…

Service benefits for the Judges of Fast Track Courts

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon August 27, 2018in Administrative Law

In service jurisprudence, the appointments are made by employer with different nomenclature/characteristics. Appointments are made both on permanent or temporary basis against permanent post or temporary post. The appointment can also be made on adhoc basis on permanent or temporary post. There is one common feature of appointments of permanent, temporary or adhoc appointment i.e. those appointments are made against the post whether permanent or temporary.

Ex-Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors [ALL SC 2018 MAY]

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon June 13, 2018in CIVIL

KEYWORDS: Principle of Promissory Estoppel - Reservist pension DATE: MAY 08, 2018 ACTS: Regulation 78 of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964,Naval Regulations Part-III HELD: " The appellants are not entitled to count 50% of the Fleet Reserve as they were never drafted into…

D. S. Nakara and others vs Union of India[ALL SC 1982 DECEMBER]

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon October 12, 2017June 5, 2019in Constitution

KEYWORDS:-PENSION SCHEME- UNREASONABLE CLASSIFICATION- DATE :-17-12-1982 Any member of the public having sufficient interest can maintain an action for such judicial redress for public injury arising from a breach of public duty. With the expanding horizons of socio-economic justice, the…

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Rekha Jain Vs. State of Karnataka & Anr-10/05/2022

SECTION 420 IPC-In the absence of any allegation of inducement by the accused Rekha Jain, she cannot be prosecuted for the offence under Section 420 of IPC.

Biltu Bhattacharya Vs. State of West Bengal-10/05/2022

CRIMINAL REVIEW PETITION DISMISSED-SEC 302 IPC-We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.

Jacob Puliyel Vs Union of India-02/05/2022

Imposing restrictions on the rights of persons who are unvaccinated is totally unwarranted as there is no basis for discriminating against unvaccinated persons. Vaccinated people are also prone to infection

Shraddha Gupta Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors – 26/04/2022

Whether, a person against whom a single FIR/charge sheet is filed for any of the anti-social activities mentioned in section 2(b) of the Gangsters Act, 1986 can be prosecuted under the Gangsters Act. In other words, whether a single crime committed by a ‘Gangster’ is sufficient to apply the Gangsters Act on such members of a ‘Gang’

Manisha Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr- 19/04/2022

At the stage of granting bail the Court is not required to enter into a detailed analysis of the evidence in the case. Such an exercise may be undertaken at the stage of trial.

Jagjeet Singh & Ors VS Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr-18/04/2022

The victim’s right to participate in criminal trial and his/her right to know the status of investigation, and take necessary steps, or to be heard at every crucial stage of the criminal proceedings, including at the time of grant or cancellation of bail, were also duly recognised by the Committee.

Kamatchi Vs. Lakshmi Narayanan-13/04/2022

The provisions of the Act contemplate filing of an application under Section 12 to initiate the proceedings before the concerned Magistrate. After hearing both sides and after taking into account the material on record, the Magistrate may pass an appropriate order under Section 12 of the Act. It is only the breach of such order which constitutes an offence as is clear from Section 31 of the Act.

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Subhash @ Pappu-01/04/2022

Whether respondent -accused can be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC r/w Section 149 IPC when the deceased died due to septicemia after a period of thirty days