Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
05/04/2026
  • Law Library

Practice Direction u/s 138 of NI Act by Calcutta High Court (2022)

The High Court at Calcutta issued practice directions for courts handling cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, following a Supreme Court order. Magistrates are mandated to conduct summary trials, while providing justifications for any conversions to summons trials. Additionally, inquiries should be conducted upon receipt of complaints, especially if the accused resides outside the court's jurisdiction. Affidavit evidence may be utilized, and service of summons in one complaint is considered effective for all related ones. The trial courts cannot review summons issuance but can re-evaluate jurisdiction under specific circumstances. Appellate courts are encouraged to mediate ongoing disputes.
advtanmoy 11/02/2025 3 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Calcutta High Court

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Law Library ยป Practice Direction u/s 138 of NI Act by Calcutta High Court (2022)

THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
No. 2301-RG Dated: 22.04.2022

PRACTICE DIRECTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE COURTS DEALING WITH CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT, 1881.

In compliance of the order of Honโ€™ble Supreme Court of India dated 16.04.2021 passed in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 2/2020 titled โ€œIn Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881โ€, the following directions are hereby issued for the Courts/Magistrates functioning under the jurisdiction of the High Court at Calcutta: –

1. The Magistrates of first class/Metropolitan Magistrates having jurisdiction are directed to try the offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, under summary procedure as enumerated under Section 143 of the said Act. They are further directed to record reasons for converting trial of complaints under Section 138 of the said Act from summary trial to summons trial. The conversion of summary trial to summons trial shall not be in the mechanical manner.

Read Next

  • THE NATIONAL SPORTS GOVERNANCE ACT, 2025
  • 2016 Report of Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India
  • The Number ฯ€ (Pi): History, Properties, and Importance in Mathematics

2. In all complaints filed under Section 138 N.I. Act inquiry shall be conducted on receipt of the complaints to arrive at sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused, when such accused resides beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

3. For the conduct of inquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C., evidence of witnesses on behalf of the complainant shall be permitted to be taken on affidavit. In suitable cases, the Magistrate can restrict the inquiry to examination of documents without insisting for examination of witnesses.

4. All Trial Courts/Magistrates shall treat service of summons in one complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act forming part of a transaction, as deemed service in respect of all complaints filed before the same Court relating to dishonour of cheques issued as part of the said transaction.

5. Trial Courts/Magistrates have no inherent power to review or recall the issue of summons in relation to complaint filed under Section 138 of N.I. Act. However, the same shall not affect the power of the Trial Court under Section 322 of Cr.P.C. to revisit the order of issue of process in case it is brought to the courtโ€™s notice that it lacks jurisdiction to try the
complaint.

6. The Appellate Courts before which appeals against the judgments in complaints under Section 138 of N.I. Act are pending are directed to make an effort to settle the dispute through mediation.

Read Next

  • THE NATIONAL SPORTS GOVERNANCE ACT, 2025
  • 2016 Report of Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India
  • The Number ฯ€ (Pi): History, Properties, and Importance in Mathematics

These practice directions shall come into force with immediate effect.
By Order,
Sd/-
Registrar General,
High Court, Calcutta.

In Re: Expeditious trial of cases U/S 138 of NI Act 1881- Creation of Special Courts – 19/05/2022

Read Next

  • THE NATIONAL SPORTS GOVERNANCE ACT, 2025
  • 2016 Report of Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India
  • The Number ฯ€ (Pi): History, Properties, and Importance in Mathematics
Tags: 2022 CE Calcutta High Court Cheque Bouncing Cases SummaryTrial

Post navigation

Previous: Apoha Siddhi by Buddhist Ratna Kirti (1050 CE)
Next: Surah Al-Fatiha (1) Translation and Transliteration
Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Sarvarthapedia
Sarvarthapedia

Research Methodology and Investigation: Concepts, Frameworks, and Emerging Trends

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

West Bengal Court-Fees Act, 1970: Fees, Schedules, and Procedures

WB Land Reforms Tribunal Act 1997: History, Features, Provisions, Structure, Powers and Functions

Civil Procedure Law of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1976)

Knowledge Management in the Modern Era: From History to Digital Transformation

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia, Law and Legal Materials

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

Indian Government

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Sarvarthapedia

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Education

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates