Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
11/04/2026
  • Legal Matter

Julian Assange Appeal: Observing High Court Hearing Remotely Guidelines

advtanmoy 13/06/2024 6 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
The-Royal-Court-of-Justice-london-high- Court

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป Law ยป Legal Matter ยป Julian Assange Appeal: Observing High Court Hearing Remotely Guidelines

Summary: Julian Assange’s Appeal. The High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, has issued an order allowing individuals to observe the upcoming appeal by way of an audio-visual link. The court has outlined a detailed procedure for requesting permission to attend remotely, including specific requirements for the request and strict rules for observers. Late requests may be refused, and non-compliance with the rules may result in criminal consequences. The court anticipates interest from media and the public, but emphasizes the need to manage the process effectively. The court will consider requests from individuals outside England and Wales if in the interests of justice.

The High Court Of Justice

Assange -v- USA

Case Number: AC-2022-LON-001745

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Transgender Persons Amendment Act 2026
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (March 31, 2026): De Novo Trial, Rent Control, Quashing of FIR, Promissory Estoppel

In The High Court Of Justice
Kingโ€™s Bench Division
Divisional Court

12 June 2024

Before: President of the Kingโ€™s Bench Division and Mr Justice Johnson

Between:

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Transgender Persons Amendment Act 2026
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (March 31, 2026): De Novo Trial, Rent Control, Quashing of FIR, Promissory Estoppel

Julian Paul Assange -v- Government of the United States of America

Order

UPON the appellantโ€™s appeal being listed on 9 and 10 July 2024

AND UPON the court anticipating requests to attend the hearing by video link It is ordered that:

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Transgender Persons Amendment Act 2026
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (March 31, 2026): De Novo Trial, Rent Control, Quashing of FIR, Promissory Estoppel

1-Any person may, with the written permission of an employee of His Majestyโ€™s Courts and Tribunals Service (โ€œHMCTSโ€) (which shall only be granted after approval by the court), observe the proceedings by way of an audio-visual link.

2-Any person seeking such written permission (โ€œa request for permissionโ€) shall make the request in accordance with paragraphs 3-4 below by 2 pm on 28 June 2024 (โ€œthe deadlineโ€).

3-Any person (โ€œthe applicantโ€) making a request for permission shall include in their request:

(a) the full name of the applicant;
(b) the email address of the applicant;
(c) information as to whether the applicant would be located within the jurisdiction of England and Wales at all times when attending the Hearing remotely (if a transmission direction were to be made); and, if not, details of the applicantโ€™s location;
(d) any information the applicant wishes to provide in support of the request, including in particular any reason(s) why it is contended that making such a direction would be in the interests of justice; and
(e) a statement by the applicant in the following terms:

โ€œI agree and undertake to the Court that, if permitted to attend the Hearing remotely, I will not make a recording, capture images, and/or broadcast any part of the proceedings. I understand that to do so may be an offence and/or contempt of court, punishable by imprisonment and/or a fine. I will abide by any directions given to me by the Court during the Hearing.

I agree and undertake to the Court that I will not provide the link that I am given to access the Hearing to any other person.โ€

4-A request for permission shall be used by completing this form:ย HERE

5-A request for permission that is made after the deadline must (unless otherwise agreed in writing with an employee of HMCTS) be made by written application, with payment of the applicable application fee, and must explain the reasons why it was not made before the deadline imposed by this order.

6- A request for permission that is not made by the deadline imposed by this Order and/or does not comply with paragraph 3 of this Order may not be considered and/or may be refused for that reason alone.

7-All those who are provided with a link to observe the proceedings shall be provided with a copy of this order.

8-Each such observer shall ensure that nobody else is able to hear or view the proceedings via the link unless that person has first identified themselves to the court and has been provided with permission by the court to view the link.

9-Each observer may only access the link from within England and Wales unless the observer has been given permission, in writing, by an HMCTS employee staff to observe the proceedings from outside England and Wales (in which case they may only access the link from that location). Permission to observe the proceedings from outside England and Wales shall only be granted by an HMCTS employee if approved by the court.

10-Each observer shall, as a condition of continued access:

(a) keep their camera turned off, and ensure that they are muted (unless instructed otherwise)

(b) conduct themselves appropriately and in particular in accordance with any instructions of the judges and/or court staff for persons observing the proceedings (remembering that they will be treated as if they were physically present in the courtroom).

11-Transmission via the link is dependent on the link being activated at least 5 minutes before the proceedings start, so that information may be provided by the court staff before proceedings start.

12-This direction may be varied or revoked at any time and without notice by further direction of the court.

13-Any party who wishes to vary or set aside this direction may do so on written application.

    Important note: See the attached rules for those who observe proceedings remotely. If you do not obey the rules then that might amount to a criminal offence or a contempt of court which may be punished by imprisonment.

    Reasons:

    (A) The Court anticipates that there is likely to be interest from media representatives and members of the public in attending remotely the hearing that is listed on 9 and 10 July 2024. To manage the process, we have set out a procedure whereby anyone who wishes to attend the hearing remotely can make a transmission direction request.

    (B) The court will not normally grant a transmission direction request in respect of an applicant who will not be in England and Wales during the Hearing. Anyone making a transmission direction request who will not be in England and Wales should provide information (pursuant to paragraph 3(d) above) as to why it would nevertheless be in the interests of justice to make a transmission direction order in his/her case.

    (C) Late requests, because they cause disruption to the Courtโ€™s work are likely to be refused, unless there are compelling reasons why the applicant was unable to comply with the Courtโ€™s directions.

    Dated this 12th day of June 2024

    Approved by Mr Justice Johnson.


    Tags: High Court of Justice King's Bench Division UKHC

    Post navigation

    Previous: Bibarna Satya, A Bengali Novel by Arabinda Naskar (2024)
    Next: Appointment of Four Lord Justices of Appeal: His Majesty The King Approval (12/06/2024)
    Communism
    Sarvarthapedia

    Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

    Arrest
    Sarvarthapedia

    Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

    Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

    British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

    United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

    Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

    Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

    IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

    Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

    Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

    Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

    Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

    Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

    Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

    • Sarvarthapedia

    • Delhi Law Digest

    • Howrah Law Journal

    • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
    • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
    • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
    • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
    • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
    • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
    • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
    • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
    • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
    • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
    • Supreme Court Daily Digest
    • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
    • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
    United Kingdom, UK

    Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

    British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

    British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

    USA, America

    United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

    Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

    Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

    2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

    • About
    • Global Index
    • Judicial Examinations
    • Indian Statutes
    • Glossary
    • Legal Eagle
    • Subject Guide
    • Journal
    • SCCN
    • Constitutions
    • Legal Brief (SC)
    • MCQs (Indian Laws)
    • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • FAQs
    • Library Updates