Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Current Judgments
-
Center for PIL and Others Versus Union of India and Others-11/04/2011
In larger public interest, this Court, in exercise of its power under Article 136 of the Constitution has been monitoring the investigation in a most comprehensive manner.
-
Central Bureau of Investigation & ANR. Vs. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc-05/07/19
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION-the provisions of Article 32 do not specifically indicate who can move the court. In the absence of such a provision in that respect, it is plain that the petitioner may be anyone in whom the law has…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation etc. Vs. Mrs. Pramila Virendra Kumar Agarwal & ANR. etc 25/09/2019
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION-The absence of sanction no doubt can be agitated at the threshold but the invalidity of the sanction is to be raised during the trial. In the instant facts, admittedly there is a sanction though the accused seek…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Aryan Singh Etc (10/04/2023)
The High Court in the common impugned judgment and order has observed that the charges against the accused are not proved. This is not the stage where the prosecution / investigating agency is/are required to prove the charges. The charges…
-
Chaitu Lal Vs. State of Uttarakhand-20/11/2019
RAPE-The attempt to commit an offence begins when the accused commences to do an act with the necessary intention. In the present case, the accused appellant pounced upon the complainant victim, sat upon her and lifted her petticoat while the…
-
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao Versus Ashalata S. Guram-25/09/1986
Statutory tenant is in the same position as a contractual tenant until the decree for eviction was passed against him and the rights of a contractual tenant included the right to create licence even if he was the transferor of…
-
Chandi Puliya Vs. State of West Bengal (12/12/2022)
DISCHARGE-the stage of discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C. is a stage prior to framing of the charge (under Section 228 Cr.P.C.) and it is at that stage alone that the court can consider the application under Section 300 Cr.P.C. Once…
-
Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Punjab & Anr-14/2/2020
Arbitration Award-an Award can neither be remitted nor set aside merely on the ground that it does not contain reasons in support of the conclusion or decision reached in it except where the arbitration agreement or the deed of submission…
-
CHANDRA PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN – 09/05/2014
The basic ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons;
-
Chandrabhan (D) LRS. & Ors. Vs. Saraswati & Ors (22/09/2022)
Substantial Question of Law-The proper test for determining whether a question of law raised in the case is substantial would be, whether it is of general public importance or whether it directly and substantially affects the rights of the parties…
-
Chanmuniya Vs Chanmuniya Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha and Another – 07/10/2010
Keywords:- Live in a relationship:- wife- Women in live-in relationships are also entitled to all the reliefs given
-
Charanjit Lal Chowdhury Vs The Union of India and others – 04/12/1950.
Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 14, 19, 31, 32—Deprivation of property
-
Charansingh Vs State of Maharashtra and others-24/03/2021
A GD entry recording the information by the informant disclosing the commission of a cognizable offence can be treated as FIR in a given case and the police has the power and jurisdiction to investigate the same. The appellant has…
-
Chaturbhuj Versus Sita Bai-27/11/2007
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 125—Phrase “unable to maintain herself”—Meaning of—It would mean that means available to deserted wife while she was living with her husband and would not take within itself efforts made by wife after desertion to survive somehow.
-
Chherturam @ Chainu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (13/09/2022)
Son Murdered Father-The only redeeming feature is that the appellant has already undergone 12 years of sentence and on completion of the sentence, as per remission policy, he would be liable to be considered for release. The only aspect which…
-
Chhote Lal Vs. Rohtash & Ors (14/12/2023)
The appellant/complainant, a sole eyewitness, happens to be the most interested witness being the father of the deceased and having long enmity with the group to which the accused persons belong, therefore, his testimony was to be examined with great…
-
Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. M.R Vijayabhaskar & Ors-06/05/2021
we must emphasize the need for judges to exercise caution in off-the-cuff remarks in open court, which may be susceptible to misinterpretation. Language, both on the Bench and in judgments, must comport with judicial propriety. Language is an important instrument…
-
CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER VS HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND-04/03/2020
If The information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules, the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to.Rule 151 of the Gujarat High Court…
-
Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act: SC
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VS SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL 13/11/2019-Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act: SC
-
Chirag M. Pathak & Ors. Etc. Vs. Dollyben Kantilal & Ors (15/11/2017)
The condition precedent to the commencement of investigation under S.157 of the Code is that the F.I.R. must disclose, prima facie, that a cognizable offence has been committed. It is wrong to suppose that the police have an unfettered discretion…
-
Chitresh Kumar Chopra Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)-10/08/2009
Instigation—A word uttered in a fit of anger or emotion without intending consequences to actually follow, cannot be said to be instigation—Presence of mens rea is necessary concomitant of instigation.
-
Church of North India Vs Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai and others-03/05/2005
AIR 2005 SC 2544 : (2005) 3 SCR 1037 : (2005) 10 SCC 760 : JT 2005 (5)
-
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi-iii vs M/S. Uni Products India Ltd-01/05/2020
The common parlance test”, “marketability test”, “popular meaning test” are all tools for interpretation to arrive at a decision on proper classification of a tariff entry. These tests, however, would be required to be applied if a particular tariff entry…
-
Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia Vs. M/s. Krishna Wax Pvt. Ltd-14/11/2019
Writ in Excise Matter-It has been laid down by this Court that the excise law is a complete code in itself and it would normally not be appropriate for a Writ Court to entertain a petition under Article 226 of…
-
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Laxman Das Khandelwal – 13/08/2019
Income Tax Act - According to Section 292BB of the Act, if the assessee had participated in the proceedings, by way of legal fiction, notice would be deemed to be valid even if there be infractions as detailed in said…