Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Current Judgments
-
Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel & Ors. Vs. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai-23/09/2019
In the absence of any evidence of any forgery or fabrication and in the absence of specific denial of the execution of the gift deed, the Donee was under no obligation to examine one of the attesting witnesses of the…
-
GR Green Life Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Leitwind Shriram Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd- 21/02/2021
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR-The appointment of the Sole Arbitrator is subject to the Declarations to be made under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with respect to independence and impartiality, and the ability to devote sufficient time to…
-
Guda Vijayalakshmi Vs Guda Ramchandra Sekhara Sastry-13/03/1981
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Section 21 and 21A—Sections 24 and 25 C. P. C. not excluded—Husband’s Divorce Suit can be transferred to the place where the wife’s maintenance suit is tried.
-
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others (25/10/2017)
The inherent power is not a provision of law to grant any substantive relief. But it is only a procedural provision to make orders to secure the ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of the Court. It…
-
Guman Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan – 24/5/2019
A witness can be graded as reliable, unreliable, neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable and consequences shall be followed accordingly
-
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab-9/04/1980
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 437 and 438—Anticipatory bail—Considerations for—Anticipation of foul play—The provision for grant of bail can be invoked to meet such contingency in addition to other grounds.
-
Guriya @ Tabassum Tauquir and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Anr- 28/09/2007
On a careful reading of Sec. 319 of the Code as well as the aforesaid two decisions, it
-
Guru @ Gurubaran & Ors. Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police 27/09/2019
Section 302, Indian Penal Code -the accused can only be held guilty of having committed the offence under Section 324 IPC. He has already undergone imprisonment for around 11 years and, therefore, his conviction under Section 302 IPC is altered…
-
H. Venkatachala Iyengar Vs B.N. Thimmajamma and others-13/11/1958
Evidence Act, 1872—Sections 67, 68, 45 and 47—Execution of Will—Proof of—The burden of proof is on the person propounding the Will.
-
H.V.P.N.L. Vs Mahavir-21/07/2000
The Appellate Forum is bound to refer to the pleadings of the case, the submissions of the counsel, necessary points for consideration, discuss the evidence and dispose of the matter by giving valid reasons.
-
Harendra Nath Bhattacharya and others Vs Kaliram Das (dead) by his legal representatives and others -22/11/1971
Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Section 92—Leave to sue—Necessity of—No allegation of breach of trust or necessity of scheme of administration—Provision has no application.
-
Hari Narain Vs Badri Das-04/03/1963
It is of utmost importance that in making material statements and setting forth grounds in applications for special leave made under Article 136 of the Constitution, care must be taken not to make any statements which are inaccurate, untrue and…
-
Hari Sankaran Vs. Union of India & Others – 04/06/19
Section 130(1) & (2) read with sections 211/212 and Sections 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013- Report of the RBI Report can be taken note of, while upholding the order passed by the learned Tribunal under Section 130 of the Companies…
-
Harinarayan G. Bajaj Versus State of Maharashtra and Others-06/01/2010
Under Section 244, Cr. P.C. the accused has a right to cross-examine the witnesses and in the matter of Section 319, Cr.P.C. when a new accused is summoned, he would have similar right to cross-examine the witness examined during the…
-
Haripada Dey Versus The State of West Bengal and another- 05/09/1956
No High Court can arrogate that function to itself and pass on to us a matter which in its view is purely one involving questions of fact, because it finds itself helpless to redress the grievance. In such a case,…
-
Harjit Singh Vs. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and Anr – 24/08/2021
Apex Court does not interfere with Bail order of HC. But, where the discretion of HC to grant bail has been exercised without due application of mind or in contravention of directions of apex Court, granting bail is liable to…
-
Hasmukhlal D. Vora & Anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu(16/12/2022)
While inordinate delay in itself may not be ground for quashing of a criminal complaint, in such cases, unexplained inordinate delay of such length must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor as grounds for quashing a criminal…
-
Hemaji Waghaji Jat Vs Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan and others-23/09/2008
The law of adverse possession which ousts an owner on the basis of inaction within limitation is irrational, illogical and wholly disproportionate. The law as it exists is extremely harsh for the true owner and a windfall for a dishonest…
-
Hemareddi (D) through LRS. Vs. Ramachandra Yallappa Hosmani and Ors – 07/05/19
ABATEMENT OF SUIT- Death of a party during the currency of a litigation -The impact of death of the late brother of the appellant qua the proceeding is one arising out of the incompatibility of a decree which has become…
-
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr-29/09/2021
GRANTING BAIL-The issue of bail is one of liberty, justice, public safety and burden of the public treasury, all of which insist that a developed jurisprudence of bail is integral to a socially sensitised judicial process
-
High Court, Calcutta and another vs Amal Kumar Roy and others-09/04/1962
The High Court, being the sole authority to decide the question of appointment of a Munsif to the higher rank of a Subordinate Judge, had exercised its power, after fully considering the plaintiff’s case for promotion, to pass him over…
-
Himani Alloys Ltd. Vs Tata Steel Ltd-05/07/2011
JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION-It is true that a judgment can be given on an “admission” contained in the minutes of a meeting. But the admission should be categorical. It should be a conscious and deliberate act of the party making it,…
-
Hirachand Srinivas Managaonkar Versus Sunanda-20/03/2001
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Sections 13(1A) and 23—Divorce—Non-cohabitation for more than one year after judicial separation—Divorce not granted—Husband obliged to pay maintenance to wife—Refusal to pay maintenance is ‘wrong’ within the meaning of Section 23.
-
HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. VERSUS KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS – 6/10/2016
The words “adult male” in Section 2(q) of the 2005 Act will stand deleted since these words do
-
Hotel Priya, A Proprietorship Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors-18/02/2022
DANCE BAR-whenever challenges arise, particularly based on gender, it is the task of the judges to scrutinize closely, whether, if and the extent to which the impugned practices or rules or norms are rooted in historical prejudice, gender stereotypes and…