Supreme court in the case of Imax Corporation v. M/s E-Cityย Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. [Civil Appeal No.3885 of 2017], while addressing theย issue as to whether the seat of arbitration itself is a decisive factor to exclude Part-Iย of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it was held that โthe relationshipย between the seat of arbitration and the law governing arbitration is an integral one.โ
It was held that โthe place of arbitration determines the law that will apply to the
arbitration and related matters like challenges to the award etc.โ and โif in pursuance
of the arbitration agreement, the arbitration took place outside India, there is a clear
exclusion of Part-I of the Arbitration Act.โ
[On 10th March, 2017]


More Stories
Title 2 โ The Congress (U.S. State Code): Congress, Elections, Committees, Budget and Congressional Administration
1 U.S. Code Sec 1 – Words denoting number, gender, and so forth
Title 1 – General Provisions (U.S. State Code): General Provisions, Statutory Construction and Codification