ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

14/04/2026

Search Results for: SC 2001

If the prosecution fails to satisfactorily explain the delay and there is a possibility of embellishment in the prosecution version on account of such delay, the delay would be fatal to the prosecution.

If the prosecution fails to satisfactorily explain the delay and there is a possibility of embellishment in the prosecution version on account of such delay, the delay would be fatal to the prosecution.

advtanmoy 19/07/2018
Supreme Court in State of H.P. v. Gian Chand, (2001) 6 SCC 71 dealt with the effect...
Read More Read more about If the prosecution fails to satisfactorily explain the delay and there is a possibility of embellishment in the prosecution version on account of such delay, the delay would be fatal to the prosecution.
If there was a general reference and not a specific reference on any question of law then the award can be set aside if it is demonstrated to be erroneous on the face of it.

If there was a general reference and not a specific reference on any question of law then the award can be set aside if it is demonstrated to be erroneous on the face of it.

advtanmoy 18/07/2018
If the award is erroneous on the basis of record with regard to proposition of law or...
Read More Read more about If there was a general reference and not a specific reference on any question of law then the award can be set aside if it is demonstrated to be erroneous on the face of it.
Where a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner, and in no other manner

Where a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner, and in no other manner

advtanmoy 13/07/2018
It is well settled that where a statute provides for a thing to be done in a...
Read More Read more about Where a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner, and in no other manner
The court cannot entertain an application for review if before making the review application, the superior court had been moved for getting the self-same relief

The court cannot entertain an application for review if before making the review application, the superior court had been moved for getting the self-same relief

advtanmoy 12/07/2018
In Kabari Pvt. Ltd. v. Shivnath Shroff and Ors., AIR 1996 SC 742, this Court had taken...
Read More Read more about The court cannot entertain an application for review if before making the review application, the superior court had been moved for getting the self-same relief
A direction given to file Written Statement without deciding the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the said Code of 1908 was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction.

A direction given to file Written Statement without deciding the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the said Code of 1908 was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction.

advtanmoy 09/07/2018
Bombay High Court Decided on: 12 February 2004 Jaikisan S/O Jaynarayan Bhaiyya vs United Western Bank Ltd. Equivalent...
Read More Read more about A direction given to file Written Statement without deciding the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the said Code of 1908 was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction.
Clarification “a person, trying a cause, must not only act fairly but must be able to act above suspicion of unfairness and bias”.

Clarification “a person, trying a cause, must not only act fairly but must be able to act above suspicion of unfairness and bias”.

advtanmoy 09/07/2018
160578 : (2011) 13 SCALE 352 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Narinder Singh Arora Appellant Versus State (Govt....
Read More Read more about Clarification “a person, trying a cause, must not only act fairly but must be able to act above suspicion of unfairness and bias”.