Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • NewsEditorial
    • Editorial
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • JudgmentSupreme Court
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • Glossary
  • HLJLaw Digests
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • SarvarthapediaKnowledgebase
    • Sarvarthapedia (Twelve Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
    • Volume Two
    • Volume Three
    • Volume Four
    • Volume Five
    • Volume Six
15/04/2026
  • News

Vinesh Phogat’s Application Dismissed by CAS Ad Hoc Division (Paris Olympic 2024)

Paris, 14 August 2024: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat's application regarding her disqualification at the Olympic Games Paris 2024. Due to failing the second weigh-in, United World Wrestling (UWW) replaced her before the gold medal match. The CAS decision confirms UWW's action and denies Phogat's appeal for a (shared) silver medal. Phogat's disqualification highlights the challenges wrestlers face in meeting weight requirements, involving rigorous weight cutting methods and potential drawbacks despite dedicated efforts.
advtanmoy 15/08/2024 3 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
VINESH PHOGAT’S WEIGHT ISSUE AT PARIS 2024 OLYMPICS WRESTLING

Home » Law Library Updates » Sarvarthapedia » News » Vinesh Phogat’s Application Dismissed by CAS Ad Hoc Division (Paris Olympic 2024)

Vinesh Phogat’s Application Dismissed by CAS Ad Hoc Division

MEDIA RELEASE

OLYMPIC GAMES PARIS 2024

WRESTLING

WOMEN’S FREESTYLE 50KG
THE CAS AD HOC DIVISION DISMISSES THE APPLICATION FILED

BY VINESH PHOGAT (IND)

Paris, 14 August 2024 – The Ad hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the following procedure:

CAS OG 24/17 Vinesh Phogat vs United World Wrestling & the International Olympic Committee (IOC)

The application filed at the CAS Ad hoc Division by Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat (the Applicant) in relation to the decision taken by United World Wrestling (UWW) to replace her, because of her failed second weigh-in, before the gold medal match of the Women’s Freestyle 50kg competition at the Olympic Games Paris 2024 has been dismissed. Consequently, the UWW decision is confirmed.

The Applicant sought a ruling from the CAS awarding her a (shared) silver medal for the Women’s Freestyle 50kg competition.

The matter was referred to the Hon. Dr Annabelle Bennett AC SC (AUS), sitting as a Sole Arbitrator, who held a hearing with the parties on 9 August 2024. The full award with reasons will be notified to the parties, and published on the CAS website, as soon as it is available.


Background of the Case: Vinesh Phogat v. United World Wrestling & IOC

Vinesh Phogat Disqualified from Paris 2024 Olympic Wrestling Competition

Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat faced disqualification from the Olympic Games Paris 2024 women’s 50kg wrestling competition after being found overweight on the morning of her gold medal bout.

In the sport of wrestling, weigh-ins are crucial as they determine the eligibility of athletes to compete in their specific weight categories. Unfortunately, failing the weigh-in resulted in Phogat’s disqualification from the highly anticipated event.

This turn of events came as a disappointment to her supporters and wrestling enthusiasts.

It’s important to emphasize the challenges and sacrifices that athletes endure during the process of weight cutting, as seen in Vinesh Phogat’s case. The calculated restriction of food and water, combined with rigorous exercises and sauna sessions, aims to ensure that wrestlers compete in a lower weight category for a potential advantage. However, this process often leads to weakness and energy depletion, which can be counterproductive to participation.

In Vinesh’s situation, her nutritionist had carefully calculated the necessary weight restoration after the weigh-in, which was expected to be 1.5kg. Furthermore, the impact of participating in multiple bouts required the careful administration of small amounts of water to prevent dehydration. Despite efforts to meet the weight requirements, Vinesh was ultimately disqualified due to being slightly over her 50kg weight category.

The use of drastic measures, such as cutting off her hair, highlights the lengths to which athletes may go in their dedication to making weight. Nonetheless, in cases like Vinesh Phogat’s, despite best efforts and sacrifices, meeting the weight requirement can remain a significant challenge.

Sport Arbitration (Case Laws): Court of Arbitration For Sport

Tags: 2024 CE SPORTS Sports Arbitration

Post navigation

Previous: Sport Arbitration (Case Laws): Court of Arbitration For Sport
Next: William Carey, a bogus cobbler turned missionary on Indian soil
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Google’s Knowledge Graph: History, Evolution, and Impact on Search Engines

Religion, Faith, and Beliefs: History, Theology, Politics, and Conflict with Science 

Scientific Principles: Theories, Inventors, Patents, Universities, Industrial Growth and Global Contributions

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Google-Search-SEO-tips

Google’s Knowledge Graph: History, Evolution, and Impact on Search Engines

Sarvarthapedia

Religion, Faith, and Beliefs: History, Theology, Politics, and Conflict with Science 

Sarvarthapedia

Scientific Principles: Theories, Inventors, Patents, Universities, Industrial Growth and Global Contributions

United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates
2026 All rights reserved © Advocatetanmoy Law Library .