Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
11/04/2026
  • Law

Distinction between Civil Law And Common Law

advtanmoy 25/06/2018 5 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Advocate

Home » Law Library Updates » Sarvarthapedia » Law » Distinction between Civil Law And Common Law

The legal system of a country can be identified as either following Common Law system or a Civil law system.

A rough estimation that around Eighty countries follows common Law system, they prefer judges opinion over the statutes.

Common Law Countries based on English Common Law[stare decisis /precedent by courts are binding) 

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  •  Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

  • The United States
  • England
  • Canada
  • Australia

Civil Law Countries[Only legislative enactments are considered legally binding]

  • China
  • Japan
  • Germany
  • France
  • Spain

Other Legal systems are  :

  1. Sharia system
  2. Halakha  system
  3. Canon Law system
  4. Hybrid legal system [India]
  5. Adat or Customary/ Cultural Law [  Indonesia ]
  6. The Kanun (The Code of Lekë Dukagjini of Albenia and kosovo]
  • The European Union Court of Justice mixes Civil Law (based on the treaties), attaching importance of Case Law.


SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  •  Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

AGUILAR GUTIERREZ, A. y DERBEZ MURO, J., Panorama de la legislación civil , Mexico, UNAM, 1960.

ATIAS, C., Le droit civil , Paris, PUF, 1985.

BERMAN, HJ, Law and Revolution; The Formation of Western Legal Tradition , Cambridge, MA & London, Harvard University Press, 1983.

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  •  Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)

BOUINEAU, J. and ROUX, J., 200 years of civil code, Paris, ADPF-éditions, 2004.

BREDIN, J.-D., French Civil Code . Bicentenary 1804–2004 , Paris, Dalloz, 2004.

CARNIO, P., Saggi sulla storia della codificazione , Milan, 1998.

CASTAN TOBENAS, J., Derecho español común y foral, Madrid, Reus, 2005.

CHENGUANG, W. and XIANCHU, Z., Introduction to Chinese Law, China Law Series, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 1997.

DAINOW, J., (ed.), The Role of Judicial Decision and Doctrine in Civil Law and in Mixed Jurisdictions , Baton Rouge, LSUP, 1974.

EMINESCU, Y, and POPESCU, T., Civil codes of socialist countries , Paris, LGDJ, 1980.

FAUVARQUE – COSSON, B. and PATRIS – GODECHOT, S., Le code civil face à son destin , La documentation française, Paris, 2006 .

FRECKMANN, A. and WEGERISH, T., The German Legal System , London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1999.

HALPÉRIN, J.-L., Histoire des droits en Europe , Paris, Flammarion, 2004.

HAMZA, G., The development of European private law, Bouchal KFT, Budapest, 2005.

JOHN, M., Politics and the Law in Late Nineteenth Century Germany: The Origins of the Civil Code , Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989.

LE ROY, Y. and SHOENENBERGER, B., General Introduction to Swiss Law , Brussels, Bruylant, 2002.

LEVY, J.-P. and CASTALDO, A., Histoire du droit civil , Paris, Dalloz, 2002, XIII + 1554 p.

LEWIS, ADE and IBBETSON, DJ, The Roman Law Tradition , Cambridge UniversityPress, 2004.

MARIANI, N. and PERRET, DL, Legal bibliography on the Québec Civil Law Published in English (1866-1997) , Montréal, Wilson and Lafleur, 1999.

MEDINA DE LENUS, M., El derecho civil español en los últimos 50 ańos , Madrid, Centro de Estudios Registrales, DL, 2000.

MERRYMAN, JH, CLARK, DS and O. HALEY, J., The Civil Law Tradition: Europe, Latin America and East Asia , Charlottesville, Va., Michie Co., 1994.

OBRA COLECTIVA, Un siglo de derecho civil mexicano , Mexico, UNAM, 1985.

COLLECTIVE BOOK, 1804-2004, the civil code, a past a present a future, Panthéon-Assas University, Paris II, Paris, Dalloz, 2004.

COLLECTIVE BOOK, Le code civil 1804-2004, livre du Bicentenaire, Paris, Dalloz, Litec, 2004.

COLLECTIVE BOOK, From the Civil Code of Quebec, contribution to the immediate history of a successful codification , Montreal, Editions Thémis, Department of Justice Canada, 2005.

PORTALIS, J.É.M., Preliminary speech to the first draft of the Civil Code , pref. by MICHEL MASSENET, col. “Voice of the city”, Editions Confluences, 1993.

ROGOWSKI, R., (ed.), Civil Law , New York, New York University Press, 1996.

SANCHEZ – CORDERO DAVILA, J., Derecho civil, Mexico, UNAM, 1981.

STEINER, E., French Legal Method, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

TOMAS Y VALIENTE, F., Manuel de historia del Derecho Español , Madrid, Tecnos, 1986.

VANDERLINDEN, J., The concept of code in Western Europe from the 13th to the 19th century , Brussels, Editions of the Institute of Sociology, 1967.

VON MEHREN, AT and JAMES RG, The Civil Law System: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law , Boston, MA, Little Brown, 1977.

WILLIAMS, Y., The Sources of Law in the Swiss Civil Code , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1923.

YIANNOPOULOS, AN, (ed.), Civil Law in the Modern World , LSU

COMMON LAW SYSTEMS

BELANGER-HARDY, L., and GRENON, A., Elements of common law and comparative overview of Quebec civil law, Scarborough, Carswell, 1997.

BULLIER, A., La common law , knowledge du droit, Paris, Dalloz, 2002.

CAPPALLI, RB, The American Common Law Method, New York, Transnational Publisher Inc., 1996.

LA COMMON LAW EN POCHE COLLECTION, Cowansville, Editions Yvon Blais, 1996.

COWNIE, F. and BRADNEY, A. , English Legal System in Context , London, Butterworths, 1996.

DAVID, R., English law, coll. What do i know no. 1162, Paris, PUF, 1965.

DUPONT, J., The Common Law Abroad, Constitutional and Legal Legacy of the British Empire (An Annotated Bibliography of Titles Relating to the Colonial Dependencies of Great Britain held by Twelve Great Law Libraries), Colorado, Fred B. Rothman Publications, 2001.

FARNSWORTH, EA, Introduction to the legal system of the United States , Paris, LGDJ, 1986.

FINE, TM, American Legal Systems: a Resource and Referencee Guide, Cincinnati, Anderson Publishing Co., 1997.

GILMORE, G., The Age of American Law , New Haven, Ct, Yale University Press, 1977.

HOGUE, AR, Origins of the Common Law , Hamden, Conn., Archon Books, 1974, c1966.

HOLDSWORTH, WS, A History of English Law , London, Methuen, Sweet and Maxwell, 1956-1966.

HOLMES, OW, The Common Law , London, Macmillan, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1963.

JENKS, E and al., A Digest of English Civil Law, London, Butterworths & Co., l912.

KINDER-GEST, P., Droit anglais, Paris, LGDJ, 1993.

LASKIN, B., The British Tradition in Canadian Law , London, Stevens, 1969.

PARTINGTON, M., Introduction to the English Legal System, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.

PLUCKNETT, F., Concise History of the Common Law , London, Butterworths, 1956.

POIRIER, D., and DEBRUCHE, AF, General introduction to the common law, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2005.

POTTER, H., Historical Introduction to English Law and Its Institutions , London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1958.

SEROUSSI, R., Introduction to English and American Law, 2nd ed., Paris, Dunod, 1999.

SERVIDIO-DELABRE, E., Common Law, Introduction to the English and American Legal Systems, Paris, Dalloz, 2004.

SIMPSON, AWB, Biographical Dictionary of the Common Law, London, Butterworths, 1984.

VAN CAENEGEM, RC, The Birth of the English Common Law , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.


 

Tags: Common Law Distinction Between

Post navigation

Previous: Shemales are males in disguise
Next: GUJARAT HIGH COURT PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION RULES
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates