Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
12/04/2026
  • Criminology and Criminal Law

U.S. Export Control Violations: 40 Months for Canadian

Nikolay Goltsev, a 38-year-old from Montreal, was sentenced to 40 months in prison for orchestrating an export control scheme that involved shipping millions of dollars' worth of electronics to sanctioned Russian military companies. These components were found in seized weapons and intelligence equipment in Ukraine. The Justice Department emphasized accountability for those aiding Russia's war efforts, underscoring the risks posed to Ukrainian allies. Goltsev utilized two Brooklyn companies to disguise transactions, knowingly facilitating the transfer of U.S. technology to Russia. His co-defendant, Kristina Puzyreva, received a 24-month sentence for money laundering related to the operation.
advtanmoy 09/01/2025 7 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
USA supreme court

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป Law ยป Criminology and Criminal Law ยป U.S. Export Control Violations: 40 Months for Canadian

Press Release

Canadian National Sentenced to 40 Months for Multimillion-Dollar Export Control Scheme

Wednesday, January 8, 2025

Defendant Exported Millions of Dollars of Electronics Used by Russia in Missiles and Drones

Read Next

  • Sec 195A IPC Is Cognizable: Police Can Register FIR Without Court Complaint – (Threatening to give false evidence)
  • Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026 INSC 217)
  • The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Rajkumar Yadav, 2026 INSC 225.

Nikolay Goltsev, 38, of Montreal, Canada, was sentenced today to 40 months in prison for conspiring to commit export control violations. Goltsev masterminded a global procurement scheme on behalf of sanctioned Russian companies, including Russian military companies.ย Some of the electronic components shipped by Goltsev were later found in seized Russian weapons platforms and signals intelligence equipment in Ukraine.

โ€œToday, Nikolay Goltsev joins the growing list of defendants held accountable for unlawfully procuring and profiting from the sale of U.S. technology to further Russiaโ€™s brutal war in Ukraine,โ€ said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. โ€œThe Justice Department is sparing no effort to ensure that those who violate Americaโ€™s export controls to feed Russiaโ€™s war machine answer for their crimes in American courtrooms.โ€

โ€œWhen Russia, its supporters, and its military companies lie and scheme their way around sanctions, they do not just violate the law โ€“ they endanger our Ukrainian allies and the freedoms they are fighting to protect,โ€ said Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas. โ€œWe cannot allow crimes like those committed by Mr. Goltsev to be ignored; to do so would only increase the risk they will be repeated. I commend the extraordinary Special Agents of Homeland Security Investigations who, alongside their federal and international law enforcement partners, are working diligently and bravely to support the people of Ukraine and hold accountable the perpetrators of Russiaโ€™s unlawful, unjust, and unprovoked war of aggression.โ€

โ€œTodayโ€™s sentencing brings accountability to Nikolay Goltsev for his conspiracy to ship millions of dollars of electronics to Russia in support of its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine,โ€ said FBI Director Christopher Wray. โ€œGoltsev and his co-conspirators circumvented U.S. export control laws, used intermediary front companies to hide their crimes, and sold sophisticated electronics to Russia for use in its weapons platforms and signals intelligence equipment. The FBI is committed to working with our partners to investigate, disrupt, and hold accountable those who violate U.S. laws and provide aid to our adversaries.โ€

Read Next

  • Sec 195A IPC Is Cognizable: Police Can Register FIR Without Court Complaint – (Threatening to give false evidence)
  • Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026 INSC 217)
  • The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Rajkumar Yadav, 2026 INSC 225.

โ€œGoltsevโ€™s sentence sends a strong message that those who break our laws and contribute to Russiaโ€™s brutal war in Ukraine will be held accountable,โ€ said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Departmentโ€™s National Security Division.ย โ€œThe Department of Justice will vigorously pursue those who procure the component parts that make Russiaโ€™s war machine tick. This case demonstrates that these wrongdoers will be found and punished accordingly.โ€

โ€œGoltsev and his wife thought they would โ€˜get richโ€™ by running an illicit global procurement scheme to supply sanctioned end users in Russia,โ€ said Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Kevin J. Kurland of the Department of Commerce. โ€œInstead, they got jail time.โ€

โ€œSimply put, Russia cannot effectively manufacture advanced weapons without U.S. technology,โ€ said U.S. Attorney Breon Peace for the Eastern District of New York. โ€œTodayโ€™s sentence goes a long way in preventing Russiaโ€™s access to U.S. electronics for use in the unlawful war against Ukraine. Todayโ€™s sentencing makes clear that the United States Attorneyโ€™s Office is committed to stopping Russiaโ€™s illicit acquisition of U.S. technology.โ€

Read Next

  • Sec 195A IPC Is Cognizable: Police Can Register FIR Without Court Complaint – (Threatening to give false evidence)
  • Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026 INSC 217)
  • The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Rajkumar Yadav, 2026 INSC 225.

Goltsev used two Brooklyn companies, SH Brothers Inc. and SNย Electronics Inc., to unlawfully source, purchase and ship millions of dollars in dual-use electronics from U.S. manufacturers to sanctioned end users in Russia.ย Some of the electronic components and integrated circuits shipped by the defendants through SH Brothers have been found in seized Russian weapons platforms and signals intelligence equipment in Ukraine. Some of these components were critical to Russiaโ€™s precision-guided weapons systems being used against Ukraine. During the period charged in the indictment, SH Brothers made hundreds of shipments valued at over $7 million to Russia.

To carry out the defendantsโ€™ criminal scheme, Goltsev purchased the electronic components from U.S. manufacturers and distributors under the auspices of SH Brothers and SN Electronics and arranged for the items to be shipped from those manufacturers and distributors to various locations in Brooklyn. The co-conspirators then unlawfully shipped the items to a variety of intermediary front companies located in other countries, including Turkey, Hong Kong, India, China and the United Arab Emirates, where they were rerouted to Russia.

Goltsevโ€™s communications show that he had a sophisticated understanding of export control laws. For example, in a message in February 2023, Goltsev advised another co-defendant to โ€œwrite something more substantial [to the U.S. company] so that there are no more questions.โ€ The co-defendant responded, โ€œis it better to provide them with a Chinese end user,โ€ to which Goltsev stated, โ€œyes should be ok.โ€

Goltsevโ€™s communications also show that he knew the electronic components were going to Russia for use in Ukraine and support of Russia. In a May 30, 2023 text message conversation between co-defendant Kristina Puzyreva, Goltsevโ€™s wife, the defendants discussed a drone attack in Moscow and their support of Russia:

Puzyreva: what is Putin waiting for.  He needs to destroy Ukraine.

Goltsev: yeah theyโ€™re gonna get f—ed either way.

Puzyreva: He needs to put fear into them.  Those losers.

Goltsev: Well the way he is acting they have the right to do the same.

Puzyreva: I hate [ethnic slur for Ukrainians] anyway.

The scheme involved millions of dollars and proved to be lucrative for the defendants. In a text message exchange on or about Jan. 13, 2023, Goltsev complained to Puzyreva that a subordinate of a co-conspirator โ€œasked me to make 80 accounts . . . I am making accounts for 3 mln [i.e., million]. Fingers hurting already from the laptop.โ€ Puzyreva responded, โ€œLot of money? We will get rich.โ€

The government seized $20,000 in cash from the New York hotel room in which defendant Goltsev was arrested.ย In total, the government has seized approximately $1.68 million in connection with this export scheme.

On July 24, co-defendant Kristina Puzyreva was sentenced to 24 months in prison for conspiracy to launder the proceeds of the export scheme. Co-defendant Salimdzhon Nasriddinov is awaiting sentencing.

The BIS, HSI, and FBI are investigating the case. U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Justice Departmentโ€™s Office of International Affairs provided valuable assistance to the investigation. 

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Artie McConnell, Ellen H. Sise, and Laura Mantell for the Eastern District of New York and Trial Attorney Christopher M. Cook of the National Security Divisionโ€™s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

The case was coordinated through the Justice and Commerce Departmentsโ€™ Disruptive Technology Strike Force and the Justice Departmentโ€™s Task Force KleptoCapture. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency law enforcement strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce designed to target illicit actors, protect supply chains, and prevent critical technology from being acquired by authoritarian regimes and hostile nation states. Task Force KleptoCapture is an an interagency law enforcement task force dedicated to enforcing the sweeping sanctions, export controls and economic countermeasures that, beginning in 2014, the United States, along with its foreign allies and partners, has imposed in response to Russiaโ€™s unprovoked military invasion of Ukraine. Announced by the Attorney General on March 2, 2022, and under the leadership of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the task force will continue to leverage all of the departmentโ€™s tools and authorities to combat efforts to evade or undermine the collective actions taken by the U.S. government in response to Russian military aggression.

Updated January 8, 2025

Read more:

Trafficking Nuclear Materials & Drugs: Yakuza Leader Plead Guilty (Manhattan, NY)


Tags: 2025 CE Crimes and Criminals Export Control Justice Department Russia USA

Post navigation

Previous: Trafficking Nuclear Materials & Drugs: Yakuza Leader Plead Guilty (Manhattan, NY)
Next: American Tribals Are Dravidian: A Speculative Hypothesis
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Scientific Principles: Theories, Inventors, Patents, Universities, Industrial Growth and Global Contributions

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia

Scientific Principles: Theories, Inventors, Patents, Universities, Industrial Growth and Global Contributions

United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates