Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Current Judgments
-
Bhagwan Dutt Versus Smt. Kamla Devi and another-07/10/1974
As the Magistrate is required to exercise that discretion in a just manner, the income of the wife, also, must be put in the scales of justice as against the means of the husband.
-
Bhagwant Singh Vs Commissioner of Police and another- 25/04/1985
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 154(1) and 157(1)- The injured person or any relative of the deceased, though not entitled to notice from the Magistrate, has locus to appear before the Magistrate at the time of consideration of the report, if…
-
Bhagwat Sharan (Dead Thr. Lrs.) vs Purushottam & Ors-03/04/2020
Hindu Undivided Family-It is held that where one of the coparceners separated himself from other members of the joint family there was no presumption that the rest of coparceners continued to constitute a joint family. However, it is also held…
-
Bhagwati Prasad Sah and others Vs Dulhin Rameshwari Kuer and another-07/05/1951
Evidence Act, 1872—Sections 101 to 104—Burden of proof—Joint Hindu Family—Presumption of—A Hindu family is presumed to be joint unless proved to the contrary—The burden of proving the status of the family is on the person claiming the relief on the…
-
Bhagwati Prasad Versus Chandramaul- 19/10/1965
If a party asks for a relief on a clear and specific ground, and in the issues or at the trial, no other ground is covered either directly or by necessary implication, it would not be open to the said…
-
Bhajan lal Versus State of Punjab and Others – 28/09/1970
Section 18 of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953
-
Bhawanipore Banking Corporation Ltd Vs Gouri Shanker Sharma-14/03/1950
Limitation Act, 1908—Article 182—Limitation for execution—Computation of—Review of decree—Dismissal of review application in default—Pendency of proceedings seeking restoration of review petition—Pendency of appeal against the order rejecting the restoration application—Clause (2) and (3) have no application on the basis of…
-
BHAWNA BAI VS GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS- 03/12/2019
For framing the charges under Section 228 Crl.P.C., the judge is not required to record detailed reasons. As pointed out earlier, at the stage of framing the charge, the court is not required to hold an elaborate enquiry; only prima…
-
Bhoopendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr (29/10/2021)
On the touchstone of the above decisions and for the reasons we have indicated above, the impugned order granting bail is unsustainable. The High Court has failed to notice relevant circumstances bearing on the seriousness and gravity of the crime…
-
Biltu Bhattacharya Vs. State of West Bengal-10/05/2022
CRIMINAL REVIEW PETITION DISMISSED-SEC 302 IPC-We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
-
Binod Kumar Versus State of Jharkhand and Others – 29/03/2011
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002—Sections 4, 45(1A), 43 and 44-The investigation under the PML Act is solely and exclusively within the jurisdiction and domain of the Enforcement Directorate, which is of course subject to the exercise of powers by…
-
Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs State of Gujarat and Another- 22/02/2001
Trial—Delay in proceeding-Whenever an objection is raised during evidence taking stage regarding the admissibility of any material or item of oral evidence the trial Court can make a note of such objection and mark the objected document tentatively as an…
-
Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah Vs Prabhavati-19/10/1956
In England until 1858 the only remedy for desertion was a suit for restitution of conjugal rights. But by the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857, desertion without cause for two years upwards was made a ground for a suit for…
-
Birendra Prasad Sah Vs. State of Bihar & ANR – 08/05/19
Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881-Issuance of successive notices is permissible under the provisions of Section 138-Condonation of Delay-The CJM condoned the delay on the cause which was shown by the appellant and it is evident that the appellant…
-
Biswanath Agarwalla Vs Sabitri Bera and Ors Respondent – 04/08/2009
court fees Act, 1870—Section 7(v)—Payment of court-fee—For obtaining a decree for recovery of possession, court-fees is required to be paid in terms of Section 7(v), according to value of subject-matter of suit.
-
Boloram Bordoloi Vs Lakhimi Gaolia Bank and Ors-08/02/2021
it is well settled that if the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and passes an order on the basis thereof, no further detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the order imposing punishment.
-
Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against Gautam Navlakha in Koregaon-Bhima violence
Bombay High Court dismissed the petition filed by Navlakha seeking to quash the FIR lodged against him by
-
Bondada Gajapathi Rao vs State of Andhra pradesh-16/10/1964
The appellant was convicted under S. 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. He was granted special leave to appeal by this Court. During the pendency of this…
-
Brajnandan Sinha Vs Jyoti Narain-08/11/1955
Contempt Of Courts Act, 1952—Section 3—Court—MEANING of—Courts subordinate to High Court—MEANING of—Court of a quasi judicial tribunal created under Statute is not covered by the EXPRESSION ‘court’.
-
Bramchari Sidheswar Shai and others Versus State of WEST BENGAL – 02/07/1995
Can the citizens of India residing in the State of West Bengal who are professing, practising or propagating
-
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs Sh. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma & Anr-05/12/2019
Pension Denied: Even if the first respondent had served twenty years, under Rule 26 of the CCS Pension Rules his past service stands forfeited upon resignation. The first respondent is therefore not entitled to pensionary benefits.
-
C. Ravichandran Iyer Vs Justice A. M. Bhattacharjee and others (05/09/1995)
In case the allegations are against Chief Justice of a High Court, the Bar should bring them directly to the notice of the Chief Justice of India. On receipt of such complaint, the Chief Justice of India would in the…
-
C.R. NEELAKANDAN AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND OTHERS-07/05/2014
Tamil Nadu is entitled to the reliefs as prayed in para 40 (i) and (ii) of the suit. Consequently, it is declared that the Kerala Irrigation and Water Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2006 passed by the Kerala legislature is unconstitutional in…
-
Canara Bank Vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty & ANR-20/04/2018
One well-known exception is that the doctrine cannot impart finality to an erroneous decision on the jurisdiction of