Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
04/04/2026

Law on the Right of the Home-1862

A domiciliary visit, that is, a search of a home or the appurtenant premises may, as a rule, only be undertaken on the strength of a judicial warrant stating the reasons. This warrant shall at once or at least within 24 hours be served on the party concerned.
advtanmoy 11/08/2021 3 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Austria

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Law on the Right of the Home-1862

Austria

Adopted on: 27 Oct 1862

At the motion of both Houses of My Reichs’ Congress, I deem proper to ordain the following for the protection of the rights of the home against infringements by government officials:

Section 1 [Domiciliary Visit]
A domiciliary visit, that is, a search of a home or the appurtenant premises may, as a rule, only be undertaken on the strength of a judicial warrant stating the reasons. This warrant shall at once or at least within 24 hours be served on the party concerned.

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • UK Will Not Enter Middle East War Amid Rising Energy Concerns: Keir Starmer

Section 2 [Orders, Warrants]
For the purpose of criminal procedure, a domiciliary visit can, should delay be dangerous, also be ordered by court officials, officials of the security authorities, or County chairmen. The individual delegated to execute the order shall be furnished with an authority which he shall produce to the party concerned. For the same purpose, a domiciliary visit can also be undertaken by the security authorities on their own responsibility if a warrant to appear in court or for his arrest is issued against an individual, or if an individual is caught red-handed, qualified as suspect of committing an offence on the score of public pursuit or public reputation, or found in possession of items which indicate participation in such. In both cases the party concerned shall on demand be served at once or within 24 hours with the certification about the execution of the domiciliary visit and the reasons for it.

Section 3 [Financial Supervision]
Domiciliary visits for the purpose of police and financial supervision may be undertaken by officials of these departments only in the cases determined by law. Nonetheless here too the regulations in the foregoing paragraphs hold good with respect to authority for a domiciliary visit and the certification about its execution.

Section 4 [Criminal Liability]
Every domiciliary visit contrary to the preceding provisions undertaken in exercise of office or in line of duty shall in case of malice aforethought be treated as an offence constituting abuse of official authority and in other cases as punishable in accordance with the regulations in Criminal Law as a misdemeanor against the duties incumbent on a government office.

Section 5 [Police Supervision]
Domiciliary visits for the purpose of police supervision shall, like those for the purpose of criminal court administration, be undertaken in accordance with the regulations for Criminal Law Procedure. The execution of domiciliary visits for the purpose of financial supervision shall take place in accordance with the provisions of the Taxation Penalties Law.

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • UK Will Not Enter Middle East War Amid Rising Energy Concerns: Keir Starmer

Section 6 [Confirmation]
On the occasion of every domiciliary visit where nothing suspicious was established the party concerned shall at its request be furnished with a confirmation to this effect.

Section 7 [Responsibility]
The Head of My Ministry of Justice and the Ministers of Police and Finance are charged with the execution of this law.


Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • UK Will Not Enter Middle East War Amid Rising Energy Concerns: Keir Starmer
Tags: 1862CE Human rights Law of Austria

Post navigation

Previous: Constitution of the Argentine Nation-1853
Next: King Hezekiah of Judah-He broke the bronze snake of Moses
Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Sarvarthapedia
Sarvarthapedia

Research Methodology and Investigation: Concepts, Frameworks, and Emerging Trends

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

West Bengal Court-Fees Act, 1970: Fees, Schedules, and Procedures

WB Land Reforms Tribunal Act 1997: History, Features, Provisions, Structure, Powers and Functions

Civil Procedure Law of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1976)

Knowledge Management in the Modern Era: From History to Digital Transformation

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia, Law and Legal Materials

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

Indian Government

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Sarvarthapedia

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Education

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates