Search Results for: LAW RELATING

Accused charged U/S 149 IPC read with Secs 302 & 307 and no individual charge U/S 302 or 307 framed against accused for his individual act—The charge suffered from a serious lacuna

Accused charged U/S 149 IPC read with Secs 302 & 307 and no individual charge U/S 302 or 307 framed against accused for his individual act—The charge suffered from a serious lacuna

advtanmoy 29/05/2019
Suraj Pal Versus State of Uttar Pradesh - 01-03-1955 - The opinion of prosecuting authorities that murder in question...
Read More Read more about Accused charged U/S 149 IPC read with Secs 302 & 307 and no individual charge U/S 302 or 307 framed against accused for his individual act—The charge suffered from a serious lacuna
Supreme Court held ‘The Reservation Act 2018’ is a valid exercise of the enabling power conferred by Article 16 (4A) of the Constitution.

Supreme Court held ‘The Reservation Act 2018’ is a valid exercise of the enabling power conferred by Article 16 (4A) of the Constitution.

advtanmoy 29/05/2019
B.K. Pavitra and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. - May 10, 2019 - The Reservation...
Read More Read more about Supreme Court held ‘The Reservation Act 2018’ is a valid exercise of the enabling power conferred by Article 16 (4A) of the Constitution.
Liquidity Risk Management Framework for Non-Banking Financial companies and Core Investment Companies – Draft Guidelines for public comments issued by Reserve Bank of India

Liquidity Risk Management Framework for Non-Banking Financial companies and Core Investment Companies – Draft Guidelines for public comments issued by Reserve Bank of India

advtanmoy 29/05/2019
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ISSUE DATE Date: May 24, 2019 Draft Guidelines All Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)...
Read More Read more about Liquidity Risk Management Framework for Non-Banking Financial companies and Core Investment Companies – Draft Guidelines for public comments issued by Reserve Bank of India
The embargo in Order II Rule 2 will arise only if the claim, which is omitted or relinquished and the reliefs which are omitted and not claimed, arise from one cause of action but If there is more than one cause of action the rule shall not apply

The embargo in Order II Rule 2 will arise only if the claim, which is omitted or relinquished and the reliefs which are omitted and not claimed, arise from one cause of action but If there is more than one cause of action the rule shall not apply

advtanmoy 28/05/2019
Pramod Kumar & ANR. Vs. Zalak Singh & Ors. - MAY 10, 2019 - The principle underlying...
Read More Read more about The embargo in Order II Rule 2 will arise only if the claim, which is omitted or relinquished and the reliefs which are omitted and not claimed, arise from one cause of action but If there is more than one cause of action the rule shall not apply
A person aggrieved by the order of a Tribunal can challenge the findings by a writ petition before High Court: SC on Assam Citizenship Case SUPREME COURT

A person aggrieved by the order of a Tribunal can challenge the findings by a writ petition before High Court: SC on Assam Citizenship Case

advtanmoy 27/05/2019
MAY 17, 2019.-Abdul Kuddus Vs. Union of India and Others - where the issue and question of...
Read More Read more about A person aggrieved by the order of a Tribunal can challenge the findings by a writ petition before High Court: SC on Assam Citizenship Case