written Statement

Sunil vs Meeta: Calcutta HC Stayed the Mat Suit till Disposal of Alimony Petition Calcutta High Court

Sunil vs Meeta: Calcutta HC Stayed the Mat Suit till Disposal of Alimony Petition

advtanmoy 06/02/2025

The Calcutta High Court, in the case of Sunil Bansal vs. Meeta Bansal, addressed two critical issues...

Order VIII Rule 1 CPC : Rule made by Calcutta High Court (2006)

advtanmoy 06/02/2025

The amended provisions related to filing written statements in West Bengal's legal framework allow defendants to present...

Entering the Defence-Written statement by Accused (S-233 CrPC)

advtanmoy 02/12/2023

The Court may take help of Prosecutor and Defence Counsel in preparing relevant questions which are to...

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. Vs. IL&FS Financial Services Ltd (03/10/2023) Supreme Court of India

Aditya Khaitan & Ors. Vs. IL&FS Financial Services Ltd (03/10/2023)

advtanmoy 10/10/2023

"Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt" - the law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep...

Whether Supreme Court diluted the strict provision of Order VIII, Rule 1 of CPC? Code of Civil Procedure

Whether Supreme Court diluted the strict provision of Order VIII, Rule 1 of CPC?

advtanmoy 19/06/2020

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Kailash vs Nanhku & Ors, held that the...

Apex Court is in favour of disclosing marks of Main Exam before conducting viva-voce in Judicial Services-13/12/2019

advtanmoy 16/01/2020

Pranav Verma & Others Vs. The Registrar General of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at...

Order 8, Rule 10 (CPC): Non filing of Written Statement Code of Civil procedure (CPC)

Order 8, Rule 10 (CPC): Non filing of Written Statement

advtanmoy 05/10/2019

There is an apparent conflict between the decisions of Apex Court in Topline Shoes Limited vs. Corporation...

TRIPURA GRAMIN BANK Vs. BIJAN BHATTACHARJEE AND OTHERS [GHC] – 09/12/1997

advtanmoy 05/10/2019

Documentary evidence to be produced (at or before the settlement of issues ) - 1. The parties...

RATHIN MAJUMDAR Vs. UTPAL GHOSH AND ANOTHER [CHC]-04/09/2000 Calcutta High Court

RATHIN MAJUMDAR Vs. UTPAL GHOSH AND ANOTHER [CHC]-04/09/2000

advtanmoy 05/10/2019

In the instant case court at least could have allowed the defendant/ O/P/ No. 1 to cross-examine...

Subhra Mukherjee vs M/S. Bengal Media Pvt. Ltd-10/01/2014[CHC] Calcutta High Court

Subhra Mukherjee vs M/S. Bengal Media Pvt. Ltd-10/01/2014[CHC]

advtanmoy 13/09/2019

Although, it was open for the Court to exercise its power under Order 8 Rule 5 of...

Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and others Vs Assistant Charity Commissioner and others [ALL SC 2004 JANUARY]

advtanmoy 20/07/2018

KEYWORDS:- Rejection of Plaint AIR 2004 SC 1801 : (2004) 1 SCR 1004 : (2004) 3 SCC...

Saleem Bhai and others Vs State of Maharashtra and others [All SC 2002 December]

advtanmoy 20/07/2018

KEYWORDS: Written statement- Rejection of Plaint- AIR 2003 SC 759 : (2002) 5 Suppl. SCR 491 :...

Whether at the time of disposal of the application u/o 7 rule 11 of CPC only the facts mentioned in the plaint are to be looked into? yes.

advtanmoy 09/07/2018

The law has been settled by Court in various decisions that while considering an application u/o...

A direction given to file Written Statement without deciding the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the said Code of 1908 was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction.

advtanmoy 09/07/2018

Bombay High Court Decided on: 12 February 2004 Jaikisan S/O Jaynarayan Bhaiyya vs United Western Bank Ltd. Equivalent...