Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
11/04/2026
  • Humanities

Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017

advtanmoy 30/12/2018 4 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) [TRAI REGULATION]

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY,
PART III, SECTION 4
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 30 March 2017

Read Next

  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Law is an Art, Not a Science: “Juridical Science” is a Misnomer
  • Maharaja Bahadur Sir Jotindra Mohan Tagore

THE TELECOMMUNICATION (BROADCASTING AND CABLE) SERVICES
(EIGHTH) (ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS) TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ORDER, 2017
(No. 2 of 2017)

F. No. 1-2/2017-B&CS.—- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 11 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997), read with
notification of the Central Government, in the Ministry of Communication and Information
Technology (Department of Telecommunications), No. 39 , —–
(a) issued, in exercise of the powers conferred upon the Central Government by proviso
to clause (k) of sub-section (1) of section 2 and clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 11 of the said Act, and
(b) published under notification No. S.O. 44 (E) and 45 (E) dated 9th January, 2004 in
the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,—-
the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India hereby makes the following Order to amend the
Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems)
Tariff Order, 2017, namely:-

  1. (1) This Order may be called the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services
    (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff (Amendment) Order, 2017 (2 of 2017).
    (2) This Order shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
  2. In sub-clause (3) of clause 1 of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Tariff Order), for item (b), the following items shall be substituted, namely:—

“(b) clause 3 of this Order shall come into force after sixty days from the date of its
publication in the Official Gazette;

Read Next

  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Law is an Art, Not a Science: “Juridical Science” is a Misnomer
  • Maharaja Bahadur Sir Jotindra Mohan Tagore

(c) clauses 6 and 8 of this Order shall come into force after thirty days from the date of
its publication in the Official Gazette. ”

  1. In sub-clause (2) of clause 10 of the principal Tariff Order, for the bracket and word
    “Second”, the bracket and word “Fourth” shall be substituted.

(Sudhir Gupta)
Secretary, TRAI

Note 1.—-The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth)
(Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017 (1 of 2017) was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part III, Section 4 vide notification No. 21-1/2016-B&CS dated 3rd March, 2017.
Note 2.—-The Explanatory Memorandum annexed to this Order explains the objects and
reasons of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff (Amendment) Order, 2017.

Read Next

  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Law is an Art, Not a Science: “Juridical Science” is a Misnomer
  • Maharaja Bahadur Sir Jotindra Mohan Tagore

Annexure

EXPLNATORY MEMORANDUM

  1. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India issued the Telecommunication
    (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017
    on 3rd March, 2017 to provide the tariff framework applicable to broadcasting services
    relating to television provided to subscribers, through addressable systems, throughout
    the territory of India. Clause 3 of the principal Tariff Order was required to be
    implemented after thirty days from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

  2. TRAI received representations from some stakeholders wherein it is mentioned that
    section (b) of sub-clause (3) of clause 1 of the principal Tariff Order stipulates that
    clause 3, which mandates that broadcasters have to declare the nature and MRP of pay
    channels, will come into effect after 30 days from the date of publication of this Order
    in the Official Gazette. They have also mentioned that on the other hand as per
    Regulation 7(1) of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services
    (Addressable Systems) Interconnection Regulations, 2017, every broadcaster has to
    publish its RIO within 60 days from the date of publication of these regulations in the
    Official Gazette. They have further mentioned that it is not clear where will
    broadcasters declare the nature and rates of channels as RIOs are required to be
    published within 60 days. They have requested the Authority to remove the ambiguity
    with regards to schedule for declaration of nature and MRP of pay channels; and
    publishing of RIO.

  3. Having considered the above mentioned facts and in order to harmonize the provisions relating to implementation of the clause 3 of the principal Tariff Order and regulation 7(1) of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services
    (Addressable Systems) Interconnection Regulations, 2017, TRAI has found it necessary to re-determine the dates for implementation of the clause 3 of the principal Tariff Order.

  4. In addition, in sub-clause (2) of clause 10 of the principal Tariff Order, the
    Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable
    Systems) Tariff Order, 2010 has been mentioned as the Telecommunication
    (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (second) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2010
    due to typographical error. The same error has been corrected.

  5. Accordingly, sub-clause (3) of clause 1 and sub-clause (2) of clause 10 of the
    principal Tariff Order dated the 3rd March, 2017 have been amended.

Tags: Cable TV

Post navigation

Previous: State of Punjab Vs. Rakesh Kumar
Next: THE TELECOMMUNICATION (BROADCASTING AND CABLE) SERVICES (EIGHTH) (ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS) TARIFF ORDER, 2017 (No. 1 of 2017)
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates