All

The Directorate of Estates is the custodian of Vigyan Bhavan

advtanmoy 07/07/2020

 

Directorate of Estates is an Attached Office under the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. It is responsible for the administration and management of Estates (Residential/Office Accommodation) of Government of India in the metropolitan cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai and five other cities/towns namely Shimla, Chandigarh, Ghaziabad, Faridabad and Nagpur. The Central Government Estates in the remaining cities and towns are administered by the CPWD. Directorate of Estates is also responsible for administration of Markets in Govt. colonies in Delhi, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Nagpur and Mumbai.

Administration of Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act 1971 for seeking eviction of unauthorized occupants and Ministers Residences Rules, 1962 also vests with the Directorate of Estates. It controls administration of Holiday Homes at Grand Hotel, Shimla and other Govt. Hostels at various cities/towns. It is also responsible for allotment of Govt. Residences (General Pool in Delhi) and also accommodation in Vigyan Bhanwan.

Accommodation for MPs

There is separate residential pool for mps of Lok Sabha as well as Rajya Sabha . With a view to meeting the requirement of guest accommodation, 21 suits in Western Court Hostel have been kept reserved for allotment to guest of Members of the Union Council of Ministers

Vigyan Bhavan

Vigyan Bhavan was constructed in 1956. This building forms the main Centre for International Conferences and other meetings arranged by various Ministries and Departments of Government of India Public Sector undertakings/Autonomous Bodies and Private Organizations. The Directorate of Estates is the custodian of Vigyan Bhavan since 2.12.1992

Source: Directorate of Estates

Home › Forums › The Directorate of Estates is the custodian of Vigyan Bhavan

Tagged: ,

Viewing 0 reply threads
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Next Post

Guidelines for Promotion of Indian Administrative Service to Senior Scale and Supertime Scale-2000

Tue Jul 7 , 2020
It is requested that in the interest of uniformity and objectivity, these instructions may be followed strictly, while granting promotion to the members of the Indian Administrative Service in different grades. Members of the DPCs may also be suitably briefed on these instructions at the time their meetings are held. Should any deviation from any of these guidelines is required to be made in exceptional circumstances, prior approval of the Central Government must be sought.
The Government and Security

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: