The Consumer Protection Act The Consumer Protection Rules The Consumer Protection Regulations The Consumer Protection (Procedure for regulation of allowing appearance of Agents or representatives or Non-Advocates or Voluntary Organisations before the […]
(Act No. 35 of 2019) Dated: 09.08.2019. The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 9th August, 2019, and is hereby published for general information:- An Act […]
hese guidelines, may be called the Direct Selling Guidelines 2016. These are issued as guiding principles for State Governments to consider regulating the business of “Direct Selling” and Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) and strengthen the existing regulatory mechanism on Direct Selling and MLM, for preventing fraud and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS (RECOGNITION OF CONSUMERS’ ASSOCIATIONS) RULES, 19911 GSR 619(E) DATED 9-10-1991 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 37 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 (63 […]
GSR 409, DATED 3-7-1990 In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 145 of the Constitution and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Supreme Court hereby makes, with the […]
Any direct selling entity, conducting direct selling activities, shall submit an undertaking to the Department of Consumer Affairs by 9th December, 2016 stating that it is in compliance with these guidelines and […]
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Consumer Complaint – Additional evidence before State Consumer Commission – Section 107(1) (d) r.w. Rule 27 of Order XLI, CPC – Under Order XLI Rule 27, CPC a party can produce additional evidence at the appellate stage, if it establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within its knowledge, or could not even after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by it at the time when the decree appealed against was passed.
BEFORE THE HOM’BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION WEST BENGAL BHABANI BHAWAN, KOLKATA-700027 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO _CC35/2012 In the Matter of: A complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection […]
we are of the opinion that the delay in filing the instant appeal has not been explained properly as required and the same is also not bona fide Tripura State Consumer Disputes […]
BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM APPEAL CASE NO…………..OF 2014 CONSUMER CASE NO. CC/ 03 of 2006. IN THE MATTER OF An Impugned order dated 03.05.2017 passed the Ld. Forum in […]
NOTIFICATION NO. 7811-F.S./FS/4F-25/82 PT. II, DATED 20-7-1987 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), the Governor is pleased […]
1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 2A. State Governments to recognise a laboratory as an appropriate Laboratory 3. The Constitution of the Central Consumer Protection Council and the Working Groups 4. […]
In Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Kartick Das, the jurisdiction of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum to pass an order of injunction came up for consideration. This court having regard to the […]
Notification No. F. 3(36)-FSD/82 (II), dated the 26th September, 1987. – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), […]
It must be borne in mind that Consumer Protection Act, 1986 lays down its own period of limitation.
In common parlance, the term “suit” is taken to include all proceedings of a judicial or quasi-judicial nature in which the disputes of aggrieved parties are adjudicated before an impartial forum. Proceedings before the consumer for a fall squarely within that definition.
The legislature chose to give the National Commission power to review its ex prate orders. Before amendment, against dismissal of any case by the Commission, the consumer had to rush to this Court. The amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22A were done for the convenience of the consumers. We have carefully ascertained the legislative intention and interpreted the law accordingly.
For the first time in 1856 a select committee recommended that a cheap and easy remedy, by a summary charge before a magistrate, should be afforded to consumers who received adulterated or […]
National Commission is not a Court. (See Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute, (1995) 3 SCC 583; Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital, (2000) 7 SCC 668; State of Karnataka v. […]
Protection provided under Consumer Protection Act to consumers is in addition to remedies available under any other Statute
The frame work for the CP Act was provided by a Resolution dated 09.04.1985 of the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization, which is commonly known as consumer Protection Resolution No. […]
The primary object behind permitting a class action such as a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act being to facilitate the decision of a consumer dispute in which a large number […]
Syad Akbar Versus State of Karnataka-The burden of proving the affirmative, that the defendant was negligent and the accident occurred by his negligences, still remains with the plaintiff; and in such a situation it will be for the Court to determine at the time of judgment whether the proven or undisputed facts, as a whole, disclose negligences.
Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and another Vs Samir Chandra Chaudhary[ ALL SC 2005 July]
KEYWORD: Effect of Admission-Exhibition of Document- DATE:- 14-07-2005. The effect of admission is that it shifts the onus on the person admitting the fact on the principle that what a party himself […]