BEFORE THE HOM’BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION WEST BENGAL BHABANI BHAWAN, KOLKATA-700027 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO _CC35/2012 In the Matter of: A complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection […]
we are of the opinion that the delay in filing the instant appeal has not been explained properly as required and the same is also not bona fide Tripura State Consumer Disputes […]
BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM APPEAL CASE NO…………..OF 2014 CONSUMER CASE NO. CC/ 03 of 2006. IN THE MATTER OF An Impugned order dated 03.05.2017 passed the Ld. Forum in […]
NOTIFICATION NO. 7811-F.S./FS/4F-25/82 PT. II, DATED 20-7-1987 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), the Governor is pleased […]
1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 2A. State Governments to recognise a laboratory as an appropriate Laboratory 3. The Constitution of the Central Consumer Protection Council and the Working Groups 4. […]
In Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Kartick Das, the jurisdiction of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum to pass an order of injunction came up for consideration. This court having regard to the […]
Notification No. F. 3(36)-FSD/82 (II), dated the 26th September, 1987. – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), […]
It must be borne in mind that Consumer Protection Act, 1986 lays down its own period of limitation.
In common parlance, the term “suit” is taken to include all proceedings of a judicial or quasi-judicial nature in which the disputes of aggrieved parties are adjudicated before an impartial forum. Proceedings before the consumer for a fall squarely within that definition.
The legislature chose to give the National Commission power to review its ex prate orders. Before amendment, against dismissal of any case by the Commission, the consumer had to rush to this Court. The amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22A were done for the convenience of the consumers. We have carefully ascertained the legislative intention and interpreted the law accordingly.
For the first time in 1856 a select committee recommended that a cheap and easy remedy, by a summary charge before a magistrate, should be afforded to consumers who received adulterated or […]
National Commission is not a Court. (See Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute, (1995) 3 SCC 583; Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital, (2000) 7 SCC 668; State of Karnataka v. […]
Protection provided under Consumer Protection Act to consumers is in addition to remedies available under any other Statute
The frame work for the CP Act was provided by a Resolution dated 09.04.1985 of the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization, which is commonly known as consumer Protection Resolution No. […]
The primary object behind permitting a class action such as a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act being to facilitate the decision of a consumer dispute in which a large number […]
It is clear that even in an action in torts, if the defendant gives no rebutting evidence but a reasonable, explanation, equally consistent with the presence as well as with the absence […]
Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and another Vs Samir Chandra Chaudhary[ ALL SC 2005 July]
KEYWORD: Effect of Admission-Exhibition of Document- DATE:- 14-07-2005. The effect of admission is that it shifts the onus on the person admitting the fact on the principle that what a party himself […]
KEYWORDS :- Consumer-Insurance policy- DATE :-January 10, 2018- Under-insurance basically means that the insured has taken out an insurance policy in which he has valued the insured items for a sum which […]
the conduct of the respondent clearly shows that he had not come to court with clean hands. In fact, in December, 2004 when a letter was written to the appellants offering them […]