In case of the partition suit, all the parties are to be treated as plaintiffs. Even if any preliminary decree would have been passed by this court in this suit based on the said affidavit dated 15th October, 1985 under Order 20 Rule 18 read with sections 151 to 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, court has ample power to pass more than one preliminary decree or to modify the preliminary decree prior to passing of the final decree having regard to change of supervening circumstances.
A joint Hindu family under Dayabhaga is, like a Mitakshara family, normally joint in food, worship and estate-SC
The differences between the Mitakshara and Dayabhaga schools on the birth-right of coparceners and the rules of inheritance have no bearing on the issues arising in this appeal, particularly on the question […]
The manager of Joint hindu family is competent to alienate joint family property if it is clearly beneficial to the estate even though there is no legal necessity justifying the transaction.
AIR 1964 SC 1385 : (1964) 6 SCR 321 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Balmukand Appellant Versus Kamla Wati and others Respondent (Before : K. Subba Rao And J. R. Mudholkar, JJ.) Civil […]