The appellant could not insist on on-board laundry facility which was never committed to be delivered to the appellant along with the instrument nor there could be any installation of the equipment without installation of 1KVA Online UPS as part of pre-installation requirements.
The definition of consumer u/s 2(1)(d) does include the services rendered by Advocate – Madras High Court
Even if the section is declared to be unconstitutional the other sections of the Act will continue to be intact and if the services of the advocate fall within the definition of service u/s 2(o) of the Act, then, it will be certainly open to a client to proceed against, the advocate before the Consumer Redressal Forum.
we are of the opinion that the delay in filing the instant appeal has not been explained properly as required and the same is also not bona fide Tripura State Consumer Disputes […]
NOTIFICATION NO. 7811-F.S./FS/4F-25/82 PT. II, DATED 20-7-1987 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), the Governor is pleased […]
1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 2A. State Governments to recognise a laboratory as an appropriate Laboratory 3. The Constitution of the Central Consumer Protection Council and the Working Groups 4. […]
How and by which principle, the Court should decide the issue of negligence of a professional doctor-SC Explained it after 22 years of filing the original complaint in favor of the doctor and against the lady patient- complainant.
In common parlance, the term “suit” is taken to include all proceedings of a judicial or quasi-judicial nature in which the disputes of aggrieved parties are adjudicated before an impartial forum. Proceedings before the consumer for a fall squarely within that definition.
The legislature chose to give the National Commission power to review its ex prate orders. Before amendment, against dismissal of any case by the Commission, the consumer had to rush to this Court. The amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22A were done for the convenience of the consumers. We have carefully ascertained the legislative intention and interpreted the law accordingly.
For the first time in 1856 a select committee recommended that a cheap and easy remedy, by a summary charge before a magistrate, should be afforded to consumers who received adulterated or […]
National Commission is not a Court. (See Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute, (1995) 3 SCC 583; Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital, (2000) 7 SCC 668; State of Karnataka v. […]