Global Scholastic Commentary: Secular Truth of New Testament

Purpose of the Global Scholastic Commentary

The purpose of the Global Scholastic Commentary is to elucidate the secular meaning of the New Testament texts, which we have received up to the King James Authorized Bible and the original Greek manuscripts. This effort is not merely an academic exercise; it recognizes the New Testament as a significant work that holds importance not only for Christians but also for followers of other faiths, including Jews and Muslims. By delving deeper into the cultural and historical contexts surrounding these texts, we aim to foster a richer understanding of their messages and implications. Moreover, this commentary seeks to bridge gaps between different religious interpretations, promoting dialogue and respect among diverse communities. The insights derived from this analysis can illuminate shared values and teachings that resonate across faith boundaries, ultimately contributing to interfaith harmony and mutual appreciation.

Three major religions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—are interconnected through a common heritage that is often referred to as “Abrahamic.” This shared ancestry provides a framework for understanding the complex interplay of beliefs that shape these faiths. While the three religions derive from a foundational narrative that includes figures like Abraham, their distinct interpretations of God or the super-reality create a tapestry of theological diversity. Additionally, their perspectives on central figures within their traditions, such as Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, further underscore this divergence.

Delving into some specific details reveals intriguing particularities: for instance, while Moses is a pivotal figure in both Judaism and Christianity, he never spoke Biblical Hebrew as we understand it today. This hints at the evolving nature of language and belief throughout history. In Christianity, the conceptualization of God incorporates various human elements, demonstrating a relational understanding of the divine that appeals to the experiences of believers. In the context of Islam, Muhammad is recognized as a prophet who acknowledges the contributions of Moses and Jesus to the spiritual landscape, while also navigating a complex relationship with their followers, which included periods of persecution.

Through this commentary, we aim to uncover secular truths within the New Testament that resonate with non-religious readers and those who seek understanding beyond dogma. This exploration is designed to offer insights that transcend theological boundaries, encouraging dialogue and reflection. By focusing on the universal themes present in these texts, we hope to foster a deeper understanding of our shared heritage while acknowledging and appreciating the differing beliefs that shape our world today. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks to bridge gaps and illuminate the ways in which humanity’s quest for meaning can lead to both unity and respectful diversity.

Scholastic Commentary

The New Testament (NT) documents (27 Greek texts) are not based on science but on revelation, a psychological insight believed to originate from God rather than empirical evidence. The documents, which emerged not before 400 CE by the Roman Church, reflect a historical and cultural context that influenced their creation. Importantly, the New Testament documents were unavailable to the Prophet Muhammad, as he did not have access to the Arabian/Aramaic Version, further illustrating the distinct religious landscapes of that era. The NT documents can be divided into two parts, namely the theological part and the theological doctrinal part, each serving a unique purpose in the religious narrative. The synoptic elements within these texts were mere adjustments made not before 400 CE, indicating a process of refinement and consolidation over time. Theology itself was a very late development, emerging as a means to interpret and systematize the teachings found within these texts, and the Gospels were designed to fit this evolving theological framework. Letters were produced to corroborate the facts with theology and Hebrew biblical statements, helping to bridge connections between early Christian beliefs and Jewish traditions. The authors supplied no specific dates in the epistles, although they were aware of standard practices to indicate dates and places, following Athenian or Roman methods. Liturgical practices had their independent origin, evolving separately from the texts, and after 325-350 CE, the liturgical celebrations began to align more closely with the evolving theology and later, with the Gospels themselves. This alignment marked a significant shift in how early Christians understood their faith, intertwining their worship with theological reflections and the textual narratives they held sacred.

The Gospel moves around the ‘Killing of the firstborn son by the father for redemption.’ This mega theme underscores a striking parallel between what Abraham did in the Hebrew Bible and the actions attributed to the God of the New Testament. In both accounts, a father figure is faced with a daunting choice that tests the limits of faith and sacrifice. If somebody does not accept the same, he is possessed by Satan, whether he may be Peter, the head of the Apostles, known for his unwavering faith yet also his moments of doubt. This raises critical theological questions about the nature of divine love and justice. Now, here we are getting the smell of doubt that ‘Father God’ is different from the Hebrew God, a notion that reverberates through the ages, prompting believers and scholars alike to grapple with the complexities of monotheism and the evolving perception of God’s essence across different scriptural traditions.

We would discover through the commentary why the gospels were not written in Hebrew or Latin (the local languages), but rather in Greek, which was the lingua franca of the Eastern Mediterranean during that period. This choice suggests a deliberate strategy aimed at reaching a broader audience beyond just the immediate Jewish context. We do not presume that any ‘Original’ was written in any other language than Greek, and the writers of the Gospels were acutely aware that, while the circumstances of Christ’s life were rooted in a Jewish milieu, they intentionally deviated from this context to convey a message that transcended cultural boundaries and expectations, possibly to obscure certain aspects from their immediate listeners. It seems that the gospellers were primarily interested in telling something else apart from Jesus, focusing on the theological implications and the universal themes of love and redemption that they believed would resonate more deeply with a diverse audience. Additionally, it is noteworthy that Paul, a pivotal figure in early Christianity, never chatted with Joseph and Mary or visited Bethlehem, yet his letters and teachings significantly shaped the early Christian doctrine and its spread, highlighting the complex interplay between the historical figures of the time and the evolving narratives that were being created.

‘Believing in the Crucified Christ is the reason for salvation’ was the one-liner dogma of Paul; apart from this, anything else was deemed satanic, even the figure of Jesus Himself. The New Testament is overwhelmingly centered around Paul and his interpretation of Christ’s mission. Within this framework, Paul establishes a covenant with Christ that serves as the foundational bedrock for the Christian faith, creating a distinct separation between his teachings and those of other figures. Without the lens of Paul, Christ might appear as a fragile legal entity, lacking the robust theological framework that Paul so expertly crafted. The personification of this legal entity is encapsulated in the character of Jesus; in this intricate analogy, Christ assumes the role of the head, Jesus personifies the tail, and Paul forms the body that connects the two, thus creating a complete organism that represents the entire New Testament Canonical Texts. Through Paul’s writings, believers are introduced to a revolutionary understanding of salvation, one that emphasizes faith and grace, while simultaneously elevating Paul’s own role as an apostle and interpreter of divine truth.

The secret of NT interpretation is hidden behind two symbols, namely, water and fish, which together symbolize the essential roles of sustenance and transformation in the Christian faith. Water, often seen as a source of life, represents the baptismal aspect of Jesus’ ministry, while fish alludes to the apostles, who were called to be “fishers of men.” Interestingly, the risen Jesus never found that his apostles were celebrating the Lord’s Supper nor did he celebrate it himself during his appearances after resurrection; this absence raises intriguing questions about the early Christian practices and their alignment with the teachings of Christ. Furthermore, he never explicitly stated or indicated that he would send Paul to propagate the Gospel, leaving a significant gap in understanding the development of Christian doctrine through the lens of apostolic authority. The current author of this New Testament Global Scholastic Commentary outrightly rejects the possibility of Jesus or his apostles ever visiting India or the Eastern part of Asia, thus suggesting that the transmission of Christian teachings was primarily a Western phenomenon, with implications for how we view the spread of Christianity and its cultural integrations throughout history.

Jesus will never come for the second time as he already came and ate fish with his companions, sharing intimate moments filled with conversation and fellowship, and then he made a third visit to the earth before Paul’s missionary journeys began. This experience was filled with profound lessons and teachings that shaped the early beliefs of his followers. His future visitation is merely poetic rather than theological or actual, often romanticized in various interpretations; this imagery serves to inspire hope and reflection rather than to indicate a literal return, emphasizing a symbolic presence that continues to influence spiritual thought and practice in contemporary society.

The hope of the Church members is thus the restoration of their inner Divinity and gaining real Blood and Water within their Body through good Karma, which is an essential aspect of their spiritual journey. They believe that by embracing love and compassion, they can transcend their earthly struggles and connect with a higher essence that lies within. Love your neighbor and do not kill them is not just a mere commandment; it encapsulates the very essence of their teachings, emphasizing that every act of kindness fosters a sense of community and harmony, ultimately leading to collective enlightenment and a deeper understanding of one’s purpose in the divine tapestry of life.

We shall use Greek Text for Comments