Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
11/04/2026
  • Europe

Apple etc six gatekeepers complied Digital Markets Act (07/03/2024)

The European Commission announced that Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and ByteDance must fully comply with the Digital Markets Act. This aims to create fairer digital markets in the EU and give new rights to businesses and end-users. The Commission will rigorously assess compliance and enforce the DMA, with fines of up to 10% of turnover for infringements.
advtanmoy 13/03/2024 5 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
European union

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป National ยป Europe ยป Apple etc six gatekeepers complied Digital Markets Act (07/03/2024)

Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and ByteDance complied Digital Markets Act

European Commission

PRESS RELEASE: 7 March 2024

Brussels

Read Next

  • Banking and financial outlook for Greece & Europe in 2026: Speech by the Bank of Greece Governor Yiannis Stournaras
  • EU Brandedย IRGCย as a Terrorist Organisation in New Sanctions Move
  • Keir Starmer on Iran: UK would not be involved in the strikes on Iran

As of today,ย Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and ByteDance,ย theย six gatekeepers designatedย by the Commission in September 2023, have to fully comply with all obligations in the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The Digital Markets Act (DMA) establishes a set of clearly defined objective criteria to identify โ€œgatekeepersโ€. Gatekeepers are large digital platforms providing so-called core platform services, such as for example online search engines, app stores, messenger services. Gatekeepers will have to comply with the doโ€™s (i.e. obligations) and donโ€™ts (i.e. prohibitions) listed in the DMA.

The DMA aims to make digital markets in the EU more contestable and fairer. It establishes new rules for 10 defined core platform services, such as search engines, online marketplaces, app stores, online advertising and messaging, and gives new rights to European businesses and end-users.

Business users established in the EU that depend on services offered by the six gatekeepers to reach their customers will enjoy new opportunities as of today. For instance, business users will be able to:

Read Next

  • Banking and financial outlook for Greece & Europe in 2026: Speech by the Bank of Greece Governor Yiannis Stournaras
  • EU Brandedย IRGCย as a Terrorist Organisation in New Sanctions Move
  • Keir Starmer on Iran: UK would not be involved in the strikes on Iran

  • Benefit from fair treatment and a level playing field when in competition with gatekeeper services on their platforms.
  • Request interoperability with gatekeepers’ services to offer new innovative services.
  • Sell their apps through alternative channels other than the gatekeeper’s app stores.
  • Access data generated by their activities on gatekeepers’ platforms.
  • Promote offers and conclude contracts with customers outside the gatekeeper’s platform.

End-users will benefit from more choice and innovation in the digital space in Europe. They will be able to:

  • Reclaim their power to choose and not be locked in to gatekeepers’ default choices, for example by choosing alternative app stores and services, to those offered by the gatekeepers.
  • Gain better control over their data by being able to decide whether the gatekeeper can link their accounts, and thereby track and combine their personal data across different services.
  • Easily obtain, transfer and use data from one service or app to another one, allowing for seamless data backups and moving between different services.
  • Use alternative electronic identification or in-app payment services.  

Gatekeepers started testing measures to comply with the DMA ahead of the deadline, triggering feedback from third parties. As of today, gatekeepers are required to prove their effective compliance with the DMA and outline the measures undertaken in compliance reports. The public version of these reports is accessible on the Commission’s dedicated DMA webpage. Today, the designated gatekeepers also have to submit to the Commission an independently audited description of any techniques used for profiling consumers, along with a non-confidential version of the report.

The Commission will now carefully analyse the compliance reports and assess whether the implemented measures are effective in achieving the objectives of the relevant obligations under the DMA. The Commission’s assessment will also be based on the input of interested stakeholders, including in the context of the compliance workshops, where gatekeepers are invited to present their solutions.

Read Next

  • Banking and financial outlook for Greece & Europe in 2026: Speech by the Bank of Greece Governor Yiannis Stournaras
  • EU Brandedย IRGCย as a Terrorist Organisation in New Sanctions Move
  • Keir Starmer on Iran: UK would not be involved in the strikes on Iran

The Commission will not hesitate to take formal enforcement action, using the entire toolbox at its disposal to fully enforce the DMA.

Should the Commission suspect an infringement of the DMA, it can open proceedings to investigate the potential breach. In case of an infringement, the Commission can impose fines of up to 10% of the company’s total worldwide turnover, which can go up to 20% in case of repeated infringement. Moreover, in case of systematic infringements, the Commission is also empowered to adopt additional remedies such as obliging a gatekeeper to sell a business or parts of it or banning the gatekeeper from acquisitions of additional services related to the systemic non-compliance.

Background

The DMA, together with the Digital Services Act, form a single set of rules that apply across the whole EU to create a safer digital space where the fundamental rights of users are protected and to establish a level playing field for businesses.

The DMA aims to ensure contestable and fair markets in the digital sector. It regulates gatekeepers, which are large digital platforms that provide an important gateway between business users and consumers, whose position can grant them the power to create a bottleneck in the digital economy.

On 5 September 2023, the Commission designated six gatekeepers – Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Microsoft โ€“ and 22 of their core platform services. Following their designation, gatekeepers had six months to comply with the full list of obligations under the DMA, offering more choice and more freedom to end users and business users of the gatekeepers’ services. The Commission has published an annual report on the implementation of the DMA in 2023 and the progress made towards achieving its objectives.

On 12 February 2024, the Commission closed four market investigations after finding that Apple and Microsoft should not be designated as gatekeepers for the following core platform services: Apple’s messaging service iMessage,Microsoft’s online search engine Bing, web browser Edge and online advertising service Microsoft Advertising.

On 1 March 2024, the Commission received notifications from Booking, ByteDance and X about their services potentially meeting the DMA thresholds, which could make them subject to the new EU rules on gatekeeper platforms. The Commission will take a decision on these notifications within 45 working days, i.e. by 13 May 2024 at the latest.


Tags: 2024 CE Digital media Press-Release

Post navigation

Previous: Order under Citizenship (Amendment) Rules 2024 and the CAA 2019
Next: Reaction of Ukrainian President after Russian strikes (13/03/2024)
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates