Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
05/04/2026

Informant shall be noticed before considering Bail by HC/Session U/S 376(3), 376-AB, 376-DA, and 376-DB IPC

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018-it has been mandated that the presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code
advtanmoy 20/04/2020 4 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Delhi high Court

Home » Law Library Updates » Informant shall be noticed before considering Bail by HC/Session U/S 376(3), 376-AB, 376-DA, and 376-DB IPC

HIGH COURT OF DELHI PRACTICE DIRECTION

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

No. 67/Rules/DHC

Dated: 24.09.2019

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

PRACTICE DIRECTION

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stood amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 22 of 2018) w.e.f. 21.04.2018 vide which, amongst others, it has been mandated that the presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code and that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail, give notice of such application to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application.

The relevant provisions of “The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018” in this respect are reproduced herein below:-

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

“23. In Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-

(a) In sub-section(1), after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided further that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub-Section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application.”

Read Next

  • Supreme Court Daily Digest (April 4th, 2026): Arbitration, Sanction for prosecution, Oral inquiry, Cancellation of bail
  • Art 72 of the COI: Presidential Power of Pardon, Remission and Commutation
  • Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

(b) After sub-section(1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-

“(1-A) The presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).”

In order to ensure better and effective compliance of the above provisions, Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to direct as under:-

(a) Before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub-Section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code, the High Court or the Court of Session shall give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application; and

(b) The Courts shall ensure that the Investigating Officer has, in writing as per Annexure A, communicated to the informant or any person authorized by her that her presence is obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code. Annexure A shall be filed by the I.O. along with the Reply / Status Report to such bail application and the Courts shall make all endeavour to ensure presence of the informant or any person authorized by her.

These directions shall come into force with immediate effect.

By Order
Sd/-

(DINESH KUMAR SHARMA)
REGISTRAR GENERAL

ANNEXURE A

NOTICE TO INFORMANT OF OBLIGATION TO BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPLICATION FOR BAIL TO THE PERSON ACCUSED OF THE OFFENCE UNDER SUB-SECTION (3) OF SECTION 376 OR SECTION 376-AB OR SECTION 376-DA OR SECTION 376-DB OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

You are hereby informed that the person accused in FIR No._______ dated __________

PS ________________ under Section ____________ has filed an application for grant of bail

which is listed for hearing in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi / Hon’ble Court of Sh. / Smt.

_________, Additional Sessions Judge, _________ District, Delhi.

Kindly take notice that as per Section 439 (1-A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 your presence / presence of any person authorised by you is obligatory at the time of hearing of the above mentioned bail application.

(S/d)

Informant

(S/d)

Investigating Officer

I, ___________, SHO of P.S. __________ do hereby certify that the I.O. of the above mentioned FIR has duly communicated the informant that her presence / presence of any person authorized by her is obligatory at the time of hearing of the bail application of the person accused in FIR No. _______ dated ________.

(S/d)
SHO, P.S. ___________


 

Tags: Delhi Delhi High Court PRACTICE DIRECTION

Post navigation

Previous: DELHI HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE RULES, 1970
Next: Judgment and Decrees: Delhi High Court Rules for Subordinate Civil Courts
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

West Bengal Court-Fees Act, 1970: Fees, Schedules, and Procedures

WB Land Reforms Tribunal Act 1997: History, Features, Provisions, Structure, Powers and Functions

Civil Procedure Law of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1976)

Knowledge Management in the Modern Era: From History to Digital Transformation

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia, Law and Legal Materials

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

Indian Government

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Sarvarthapedia

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Education

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates