Skip to content
  • CONTACT
  • E-Books
  • Language Index
  • Sanskrit संस्कृत
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • SouthEast Asia
  • Australia
  • America
  • Europe
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Google Search

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Online Legal Research and Law Library

  • Home
    • SITE UPDATES
  • Constitutions
  • Dictionary
  • Documents
  • Legal Principles
  • Top News
  • LAW EXAM
  • PLEADING
  • INDEX
  • Notifications
  • Indian Law
  • English Law
  • Articles
  • Law Schools
    • USA Law Schools

Tag: search and seizure

12Mar

Whether illegally collected evidence by police is admissible? – YES

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon March 12, 2022March 12, 2022in Criminal Investigation

The right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution. [ JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR.]

04Jun

WAZIR CHAND Vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – 22/04/1954

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon June 4, 2019June 30, 2019in Supreme Court Judgments

A person in possession of the goods even if not belonging to him cannot be dispossessed without authority of law. Goods in the possession of a person who is not lawfully in possession of them cannot be seized except under authority of law, and in absence of such authority, one could not be deprived of them.

18May

Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. and others Vs Tapan Kr. Singh [ALL SC 2003 APRIL]

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon May 18, 2018May 18, 2018in Criminal

KEYWORD:- GD ENTRY-PUTTING WRONG SECTIONS BY POLICE IN FIR- The mentioning of a particular Section in the F.I.R. is not by itself conclusive as it is for the Court to frame charges having regard to the material on record. Even…

Read More Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. and others Vs Tapan Kr. Singh [ALL SC 2003 APRIL]

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Manoj Pratap Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan-24/06/2022

DEATH PENALTY CONFIRMED-Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed; conviction of the appellant of offences under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f), 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is confirmed; and the sentences awarded to the appellant, including the death sentence for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are also confirmed.

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI VS STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR-24/06/2022

FURTHER INVESTIGATION-No fault can be found with the approach of the SIT in submitting final report , which is backed by firm logic, expositing analytical mind and dealing with all aspects objectively for discarding the allegations regarding larger criminal conspiracy (at the highest level) for causing and precipitating mass violence across the State against the muslim community.

Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala-24/06/2022

SENTENCE REDUCED- Accused(A1) was charge-sheeted for offence U/S 55(g) and 8(1) read with 8(2) of the Abkari Act and was convicted for the aforestated offences and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/each

Krishna Rai (D) through LRS. & Ors. Vs. Banaras Hindu University through Registrar & Ors-16/06/2022

Whether principle of estoppel and acquiescence will prevail over statutory service rules prescribing the procedure for promotion of ClassIV employees to ClassIII working in the Banaras Hindu University(BHU)

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors-09/06/2022

Habeas corpus – the writ petition seeking writ of habeas corpus for production of corpus – Pranav Acharya aged 5 years

Vallal Rck Vs. M/s. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. and Ors-03/06/2022

Apex Court has, time and again, emphasized the need for minimal judicial interference by the NCLAT and NCLT in the framework of IBC

Mahendra Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Madya Pradesh-03/06/2022

It is a sound and well established rule of law that the court is concerned with the quality and not with the quantity of the evidence necessary for proving or disproving a fact.

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. A. Balakrishnan & Anr (30/05/2022)

Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016-the application under Section 7 of the IBC was filed within a period of three years from the date on which the Recovery Certificate was issued. As such, the application under Section 7 of the IBC was within limitation.

READ MORE


SUPREME COURT OF UK , USA ICC AND ICJ

Ukraine v. Russian Federation-ICJ-16/03/2022

Jenet Reno vs American Civil Liberties Union-26/06/1997

Bull and another Vs Hall and another-27/11/2013

United Kingdom

Begum vs Secretary of State- UK SC held Jihadi bride Shamima Begam cannot enter UK

International Court of Justice

BAHRAIN, EGYPT, SAUDI ARABIA AND UNITED ARAB EMIRATES v. QATAR-ICJ 14/07/2020

ICJ

THE GAMBIA v. MYANMAR-ICJ 23/01/2020

Deadline to file writ petition is extended 150 days from the date of lower court judgment due to Covid-19: US Supreme Court

ICJ

International Court of Justice: Jurisdiction conferring treaties

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

OIC WCC RSS

  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • VEDIC STUDIES
  • PHILOSOPHY
  • HISTORY
  • RELIGION
  • MEDICAL
  • ENVIRONMENT
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • TORTS
  • JURISPRUDENCE
  • MUSLIM LAW
  • HINDU LAW
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Google Search
  • Follow Following
    • Advocatetanmoy Law Library
    • Join 1,207 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Advocatetanmoy Law Library
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar