Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
06/04/2026
  • Law

Irrigated Area

advtanmoy 26/12/2018 4 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 – Section 14, Section 14(o), Section 14K(d), Section 14N, Section 14T

Sec. 14K(d) defines irrigated area. It runs thus : “Irrigated area means an area specie as such by the State Government, by notification in the Of5cial Gazette, being an area which is, or is in the opinion of the State Government capable of being irrigated, at any time during the agricultural year commencing on the 1st day of Baisakh, 1377 B.S., or thereafter, from any State Canal Irrigation Project or State Power Division deep tubewell or shallow tubewell or any other state irrigation project or State river lift irrigation project.” This definition clearly indicates that the irrigated area is an area specified in a notification made by Stan Government and such an area is or in the opinion of the State Government capable or being irrigated at any time during the agricultural year commencing from Baishak, 1377 B.S. or thereafter from Canal Irrigation, etc.

To treat an area as an irrigated area for the purpose of Chapter IIB of West Bengal Land Reform Act. it has to be seen that the lands .are noticed as in the irrigated area by the State Government but the notification is not the final determining point. Notification is made on consideration of the fact that in fact the land irrigated or the State Govt. is of the view that it is capable of being irrigated, only then the State Govt. can make the notification, It is clear from the provisions of Sec, 4N that such determination by the State Govt. by notification is not final Sec. 14N lays down .that if any question arise as to whether any land is or is not within an irrigated area such question shall be determined by the prescribed authority in such a manner as may be prescribed. Sub-sec. (2) has provided for prescribing rules for the purpose of such determination. As I have indicated in treating an area as an irrigated area initially it has to be found that if this area is included in the notification made by the State Government for the purpose of Sec. 14K(d). If such a notification is made a raiyat is entitled to raise a dispute if the land within the prescribed area. If Such dispute is raised it has to be decided by the prescribed authority in accordance with rules 148.

Read Next

  •  Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Disclosure of Personal Information under the Right to Information Act, 2005
  • Analysis of Section 8(1)(j), Right to Information Act, 2005

14N. An Order passed u/s 14N is also subject to appear u/s 14(o). It will further appear from notification No. 595(15) GE dated 12..1,73 that the State Government directed the manner in which a dispute if raised u/s 14N has to be determined. Paragraph 4 of the said notification states that in some case it has been found that some areas within certain police station which have been notified as irrigated area do not get water from the Government Canals or state power driven tubewell. In such cases or in any other case where a question arisen or will arise whether any area which has been notified is an irrigated area is really an irrigated area or not, The SLRO concerned (who was prescribed authority at that time) shall hold an enquiry under the provisions of Rule 14R(2) in respect of the affected mouzas and after hearing the raiyat Concerned shall give his decision recording the reason therefor as to the notification referred to herein.

It is, therefore, clear that the State Govt., itself admitted that even if it’ has notified some areas to be irrigated some part of the same in fact may not be irrigated. it has directed the Revenue Officer to deal with such cases to determine the question in terms of Rule 148 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Rules. Accordingly I find no justification on the part of the Revenue Officer as well as the appellate authority to rely solely on the notification in determining whether the lands in mouza Sathkahania is in irrigated area. This question has to be decided by the Rev. Officer in terms of Rule 148. His decision will be a decision under Sec. 14N as it present Rev. Officer u/s 14T is competent to act as a prescribed authority u/s 14N. Such an order is an appealable order u/s 14(O).


Source: RABEA KHATOON  Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND .ORS. [ (1987) 1 CALLT 635 : (1987) CALLT 635 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SINGLE BENCH ]

Read Next

  •  Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court
  • Disclosure of Personal Information under the Right to Information Act, 2005
  • Analysis of Section 8(1)(j), Right to Information Act, 2005

Post navigation

Previous: RABEA KHATOON Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Next: Khatal
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates