Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
11/04/2026

The Goondas Act, 1923

advtanmoy 18/11/2018 12 minutes read

© Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

[West Bengal]

The Goondas Act, 1923

Bengal Act 1 of 1923

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Cinema and Cinematography: History, Technology, Careers, and Global Film Industry

[28th February, 1923.]

An Act to provide for the control of certain Goondas residing in, or frequenting Calcutta or the neighbourhood of Calcutta, and for their removal elsewhere.

Whereas it is expedient to provide for the control of certain goondas within Calcutta and neighbourhood of Calcutta and to provide for their removal elsewhere in certain circumstances;
And Whereas the previous sanction of the Governor General has been obtained under sub-section (3) of section 80A of the Government of India Act to the passing of this Act;

It is hereby enacted as follows:-

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Cinema and Cinematography: History, Technology, Careers, and Global Film Industry

1. Short title and local extent. – (1) This Act may be called the Goondas Act, 1923.
(2) It extends to the whole of [West Bengal.]

2. Definitions. – In this Act –
[** ** ** ** **]
(2) “Calcutta” means the town of Calcutta as defined in section 3 of the Calcutta Police Act, 1866, together with the suburbs of Calcutta as defined by notification under section 1 of the Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1866, and the Port of Calcutta as defined by notification under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;
(3) “Commissioner of Police” means the officer vested with the administration of police in Calcutta under the Calcutta Police Act, 1866, the Calcutta Suburban Police Act, 1866, the Calcutta Port Act, 1890, and any Act amending any of these Acts;
(4) “goonda” includes a hooligan or other rough;
(5) “neighbourhood of Calcutta” means the areas included in –
(a) the police-stations of Baranagore, Nawapara, Barrackpore, Dum-Dum, Tollyganj, Behala, Metiabruz, Maheshtolla, Bhangore, Tittaghar, Khardah and Budge-Budge in the district of the 24-Parganas;

(b) the police-station of Howrah, Sibpore, Malipanchghora, Golabaree, Lilooah, Bally and Bantra in the district of Howrah; and

Read Next

  • Law and Governance: History, Principles, and Institutions
  • English Language: Historical Development and Global Impact
  • Cinema and Cinematography: History, Technology, Careers, and Global Film Industry

(c) any other area which is included within the districts of the 24-Parganas, Howrah or Hooghly, and which the [State Government] by notification in the [Official Gazette] may include within this definition;

(6) “Presidency area” means Calcutta together with that portion of the district of the 24-Parganas which is not included in Calcutta as defined in this section, and the districts of Howrah and Hooghly.

3. Report by Commissioner of Police or District Magistrate. – (1) Whenever it shall appear to the Commissioner of Police, that any person –
(a) is a goonda, or a member of a gang or body of goondas, and

(b) is residing within or habitually visiting or frequenting Calcutta, and that such person or that such gang or body is committing or has committed or is about to commit or is assisting or abetting the commission of –

(i) a non-bailable offence against person or property, or

(ii) the offence of criminal intimidation, or

(iii) an offence involving a breach of the peace,

so as to be a danger to, or cause or to be likely to cause, alarm to, the inhabitants or to any section of the inhabitants of Calcutta, the Commissioner of Police shall make a report to the [State Government] with a recommendation that such person or gang or body of persons be dealt with under the provisions of this Act.
(2) The same powers and duties as are conferred and imposed by sub-section (1) on the Commissioner of Police in respect of persons or gangs or bodies of persons residing in, or habitually frequenting Calcutta, are conferred and imposed on the District Magistrate having jurisdiction in any local area, which is outside Calcutta but is included in the neighbourhood of Calcutta, in respect of all persons or gangs or bodies of persons residing within or habitually visiting or frequenting such area, who appear to such District Magistrate to be goondas or members of a gang of goondas and to be committing, or to have committed or to be about to commit, or to be assisting or abetting the commission of, any of the offences set forth in clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) of sub-section (2) so as to be a danger to, or to cause or to be likely to cause, alarm to, the inhabitants or to any section of the inhabitants of such area.

4. Issue of warrant on receipt of report. – (1) On receipt of the report of the Commissioner of Police or of the District Magistrate, as the case may be, the [State Government] may make an order for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the person against whom the report has been made.
(2) The warrant shall be in such a form as shall be prescribed by the [State Government] by notification in the [Official Gazette] and shall be issued by a Secretary to the [State Government] and shall contain a statement of the heads of the charges made against such person in the report, and shall further require such person to submit by petition to the advising Judges appointed under sub-section (2) of section 5 by such date as may be specified in the warrant any representation that he may desire to make.
(3) The officer by whom such warrant is issued shall have –
(i) for the enforcement of the attendance of the person, against whom the warrant is issued, at such place and at such time or times as may be specified therein (and thereafter as such officer may direct) in order to communicate to such person the final order of the [State Government] made under section 6, and

(ii) for the forfeiture, under section 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, of any bond, executed for the attendance of such person at such place and at such time or times,

all the powers of a Presidency Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898; and the warrant shall for the purposes set forth in clauses (i) and (ii) be deemed to be a warrant issued by a Presidency Magistrate, for the arrest of such person to answer a charge in respect of a bailable offence committed by him within the jurisdiction of such Magistrate, and such person in default of sufficient security being furnished, may, unless such officer otherwise directs, be detained in custody until the final order of the [State Government] under section 6 is communicated to him.

5. State Government to place report before advising Judges. – After issue of the warrant under section 4, the [State Government] shall forthwith cause the report of the Commissioner of Police or of the District Magistrate, as the case may be, with all material facts and circumstances in their possession relevant to the same to be placed before two advising Judges, of whom one shall be [the District and Sessions Judge, or an Additional District and Sessions Judge, of 24-Parganas and the other shall be –
(a) a District and Sessions Judge; or

(b) an Additional District and Sessions Judge; or

(c) a Subordinate Judge or a Judge of a Small Cause Court who has served as such for not less than five years and as an Additional Sessions Judge or Assistant Sessions Judge for at least one year.]

(2) The advising Judges shall consider in camera the report and the other facts and circumstances, if any, adduced before them by the [State Government], and any representation, submitted to them by the person against whom the report has been made within the time fixed by section 4 or such further time as they may allow, and shall call for such further information, if any, and may examine such witnesses, if any, as shall appear to them to be necessary to enable them to tender their advice on the report. They shall also give to the person against whom the report has been made, if he so desires, an opportunity of appearing in person before them to offer his explanation, and may at the instance of that person require the attendance of any other person, whose statement may support the explanation:
Provided that –
(a) nothing in this section shall be deemed to entitle the person whose case is before the advising Judges to appear or be represented before them by pleader, nor shall the [State Government] be so entitled,

(b) the advising Judges shall not disclose to the person in question any fact the communication of which might endanger the safety of any individual, and

(c) the advising Judges shall not be bound to observe the rules of evidence and shall not permit the putting of any question which may endanger the safety of any individual.

(3) Any statement made to the advising Judges by any person other than the person whose case is before them shall be deemed to be information given to a public servant within the meaning of section 182 of the Indian Penal Code, and the advising Judges shall for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person under the provisions of sub-section (2) have all the powers of a District Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
(4) When the advising Judges has reached their conclusions, they shall report the same in writing to the [State Government].
(5) If the person whose case is under their consideration claims, when submitting his representation or when appearing before the advising Judges, that both he and his father were born in [West Bengal] or that he is a member of a family which has definitely settled in [West Bengal] and is himself so settled, the advising Judges shall give him an opportunity of establishing his claim, and shall also give to the Commissioner of Police or the District Magistrate, as the case may be, an opportunity of rebutting the same, and at the time of submission of their report to the [State Government] shall record their opinion as to whether such person has established his claim.

6. Order of removal by State Government. – (1) On receipt of the report of the advising Judges the [State Government] if satisfied that the person against whom the report has been made should be removed elsewhere, may by order reciting the conclusions of the advising Judges, as reported by those Judges –
(a) direct him to leave [West Bengal] within such time by such route or routes, and for such period as may be stated in the order, or

(b) where the [State Government] [is] satisfied that both he and his father were born in [West Bengal], or that he is a member of a family which has definitely settled in [West Bengal] and is himself so settled, direct him to leave the Presidency area within such time, by such route and for such period as may be stated in the order, and may in that case further order that he shall during the same period notify his place of residence and any change or intended change of residence and any absence or intended absence from his residence to the officer appointed by the [State Government] in this behalf.

(2) The order of the [State Government] under sub-section (1) shall be final, and shall not be called in question in any subsequent proceeding under section 9 or section 10.
7. Evasion of orders. – Where any person on whom a warrant has been served under section 4 –
(i) fails to attend at the place and at the time or times specified in the warrant and thereafter when required in order to receive the order of the [State Government] under section 6, or

(ii) prior to the issue of that order, leaves [West Bengal] or the Presidency area, as the case may be,

the [State Government] may issue the order under section 6 in the absence of that person by publishing the same in the [Official Gazette], and such person shall be deemed to have absconded in order to evade that order:
Provided that the [State Government] may condone a failure to attend under clause (i), on reasons for such non-attendance being furnished to [its] satisfaction, and in that case such person shall not be deemed to have absconded in order to evade the order.
8. Identification order. – Every person, in respect of whom an order has been made under section 6 shall, if so directed by the Commissioner of Police or the District Magistrate, as the case may be, –
(i) present himself to be photographed;

(ii) allow his finger impressions to be recorded;

(iii) if literate, furnish such officer with specimens of his handwriting and signature; and

(iv) attend at such times and places as the Commissioner of Police or the District Magistrate, as the case may be, may direct for all or any of the aforesaid purposes.

9. Penalty for breach of order under section 6. – When any person, against whom an order has been made under section 6, fails to comply with such order within the time specified therein, or after complying with the said order returns to, or after evading the said order returns to or remains in, any place within [West Bengal] or the Presidency area, as the case may be, before the expiry of the period stated in the order, or fails to give to the officer appointed to receive it the information in regard to residence or absence set forth in section 6, such person may be arrested without a warrant by a police-officer and shall be liable, on conviction before a Presidency Magistrate, or a Magistrate of the first class, to be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year.

10. Penalty for breach of order under section 8 or for absconding to evade an order under section 6. – (1) Any person who fails to comply with, or attempts to evade, any direction given in accordance with the provisions of section 8, or who absconds in order to evade any order made under section 6, shall be liable to be arrested without a warrant and shall, on conviction before a Presidency Magistrate, or a Magistrate of the first class be liable to be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or to a fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or to both.
(2) An offence under this section and under section 9 shall be deemed to be a non-bailable offence.

Post navigation

Previous: What is Judicial Act
Next: The Coinage Act 2011
Communism
Sarvarthapedia

Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848: History, Context, and Core Concepts

Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773–1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Arya vs Kamlesh Kumari: Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
United Kingdom, UK

Abolition of Slave Trade Act 1807: Facts, Enforcement, and Historical Context

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

British Slavery and the Church of England: History, Theology, and the Codrington Estates

USA, America

United States of America: History, Government, Economy, and Global Power

Biblical Basis for Slavery, english slave trade

Biblical Basis for Slavery: Old and New Testament Laws, Narratives, and Interpretations

2026 © Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates