ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Home ยป Law ยป Supreme Court Judgments-October 2020

Supreme Court Judgments-October 2020

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAArticle 124 of the Constitution of India Constitution of India > 124. Supreme Court (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges. (2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years: Provided that-- (a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office (b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4). (2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide. (3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and-- (a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or (b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such courts in succession; or (c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist. (4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-third of the members of the House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity. (5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehavior or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4): (6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule. (7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

S.No. 1Diary NumberNumber ฮ‘ฯฮนฮธฮผฯŒฯ‚689 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003483-003483 / 202015-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSATISH CHANDER AHUJA
Respondent NameSNEHA AHUJA
Petitioner’s AdvocateS. S. JAUHAR
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJustice ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฮนฮฟฯƒฯฮฝฮท > judicature ( ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฮนฮฟฯƒฯฮฝฮท) > judge (ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฯƒฯ„ฮฎฯ‚ / ฮบฯฮนฯ„ฮฎฯ‚). The whole purpose of Plato`s Republic is to search for Justice. The purpose of Justice is to establish a perfect State. The State of happiness (ฮตฯ…ฯ„ฯ…ฯ‡ฮฏฮฑ) ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
JudgmentJudgment The statement given by the Judge on the grounds of a decree or order - CPC 2(9). It contains a concise statement of the case, points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision - Order 20 Rule 4(2).ย  Section 354 of CrPC requires that every judgment shall contain points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision. Indian Supreme Court Decisions > Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts (Art 141 Indian Constitution) Civil and judicial authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court (Art 144) Supreme Court Network On Judiciary โ€“ Portal > Denning: โ€œJudges do not speak, as do actors, to please. They do not speak, as do advocates, to persuade. They do not speak, as do historians, to recount the past. They speak to give Judgment. And in their judgments, you will find passages, which are worthy to rank with the greatest literatureโ€ฆ.โ€ Law Points on Judgment Writing > The judge must write to provide an easy-to-understand analysis of the issues of law and fact which arise for decision. Judgments are primarily meant for those whose cases are decided by judges (State Bank of India and Another Vs Ajay Kumar Sood SC 2022) ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 2Diary Number1747 / 2016
Case NumberCONMT.PET.(C) No.-000034-000034 / 201609-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameASHISH SETH
Respondent NameSUMIT MITTAL
Petitioner’s Advocate
Respondent’s Advocate
Bench
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 3Diary Number2381 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003334-003334 / 202007-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Respondent NameUMESH KUMAR
Petitioner’s AdvocateB. V. BALARAM DAS
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 4Diary Number2418 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003282-003282 / 202007-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameAMIT SAHNI
Respondent NameCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Petitioner’s AdvocatePETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAKrishna Author of Bhagavad Gita (3227-3102 BCE) > โ€œเค•เฅƒเคทเคฟเคฐเฅเคญเฅ‚เคตเคพเคšเค•เคƒ เคถเคฌเฅเคฆเคƒ เคฃเคถเฅเคš เคจเคฟเคฐเฅเคตเฅƒเคคเคฟเคตเคพเคšเค•เคƒ เฅค เคคเคฏเฅ‹เคฐเฅˆเค•เฅเคฏเค‚ เคชเคฐเค‚ เคฌเฅเคฐเคนเฅเคฎ เค•เฅƒเคทเฅเคฃเฅˆเคคเฅเคฏเคญเคฟเคงเฅ€เคฏเคคเฅ‡โ€| (โ€œเค•เฅƒเคทเฅ‡เคฐเฅเคตเฅเคตเคฐเฅเคฃเฅ‡โ€ เฅค เค‰เคฃเคพเค‚ เฅฉ เฅค เฅช เฅค เค‡เคคเคฟ เคจเค•เฅ เคคเคคเฅ‹ เคฃเคคเฅเคตเคฎเฅ เฅค Similar:ย  เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคฃเฅ เคจเคพเคฐเคพเคฏเคฃ เค•เฅƒเคทเฅเคฃ เคตเฅˆเค•เฅเคฃเฅเค  เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคŸเคฐเคถเฅเคฐเคตเคธเฅ เคฆเคพเคฎเฅ‹เคฆเคฐ เคนเฅƒเคทเฅ€เค•เฅ‡เคถ เค•เฅ‡เคถเคต เคฎเคพเคงเคต เคธเฅเคตเคญเฅ‚ เคฆเฅˆเคคเฅเคฏเคพเคฐเคฟ เคชเฅเคฃเฅเคกเคฐเฅ€เค•เคพเค•เฅเคท เค—เฅ‹เคตเคฟเคจเฅเคฆ เค—เคฐเฅเคกเคงเฅเคตเคœ เคชเฅ€เคคเคพเคฎเฅเคฌเคฐ เค…เคšเฅเคฏเฅเคค เคถเคพเคฐเฅเค™เฅเค—เคฟเคจเฅ เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคตเค•เฅเคธเฅ‡เคจ เคœเคจเคพเคฐเฅเคฆเคจ เค‰เคชเฅ‡เคจเฅเคฆเฅเคฐ เค‡เคจเฅเคฆเฅเคฐเคพเคตเคฐเคœ เคšเค•เฅเคฐเคชเคพเคฃเคฟ เคšเคคเฅเคฐเฅเคญเฅเคœ เคชเคฆเฅเคฎเคจเคพเคญ เคฎเคงเฅเคฐเคฟเคชเฅ เคตเคพเคธเฅเคฆเฅ‡เคต เคคเฅเคฐเคฟเคตเคฟเค•เฅเคฐเคฎ เคฆเฅ‡เคตเค•เฅ€เคจเคจเฅเคฆเคจ เคถเฅŒเคฐเคฟ เคถเฅเคฐเฅ€เคชเคคเคฟ เคชเฅเคฐเฅเคทเฅ‹เคคเฅเคคเคฎ เคตเคจเคฎเคพเคฒเคฟเคจเฅ เคฌเคฒเคฟเคงเฅเคตเค‚เคธเคฟเคจเฅ เค•เค‚เคธเคพเคฐเคพเคคเคฟ เค…เคงเฅ‹เค•เฅเคทเคœ เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคตเคฎเฅเคญเคฐ เค•เฅˆเคŸเคญเคœเคฟเคคเฅ เคตเคฟเคงเฅ เคถเฅเคฐเฅ€เคตเคคเฅเคธเคฒเคพเคžเฅเค›เคจ เคชเฅเคฐเคพเคฃเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคท เคฏเคœเฅเคžเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคท เคจเคฐเค•เคพเคจเฅเคคเค• เคœเคฒเคถเคพเคฏเคฟเคจเฅ เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคตเคฐเฅ‚เคช เคฎเฅเค•เฅเคจเฅเคฆ เคฎเฅเคฐเคฎเคฐเฅเคฆเคจ เคฒเค•เฅเคทเฅเคฎเฅ€เคชเคคเคฟ เคฎเฅเคฐเคพเคฐเคฟ เค…เคœ เค…เคœเคฟเคค เค…เคตเฅเคฏเค•เฅเคค เคตเฅƒเคทเคพเค•เคชเคฟ เคฌเคญเฅเคฐเฅ เคนเคฐเคฟ เคตเฅ‡เคงเคธเฅ | MURARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYJustice Hrishikesh Roy Employment: On 23rd September, 2019, appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. Education: He obtained his LL.B Degree from Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi in 1982. Book/essay written: Nil
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 5Diary Number6045 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003498-003498 / 202016-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHUttar Pradesh Ancient Aryavarta Region (เค†เคฐเฅเคฏเคพเคตเคฐเฅเคค) > District Agra Aligarh Ambedkar Nagar Amethi Amroha Auraiya Ayodhya (Saket) Azamgarh Baghpat Bahraich Ballia Balrampur Banda Barabanki Bareilly Basti Bhadohi Bijnor Budaun Bulandshahar Chandauli Chitrakoot Deoria Etah Etawah Farrukhabad Fatehpur Firozabad Gautam Buddha Nagar Ghaziabad Ghazipur Gonda Gorakhpur Hamirpur Hapur Hardoi Hathras Jalaun Jaunpur Jhansi Kannauj Kanpur Dehat Kanpur Nagar Kasganj Kaushambi Kushi Nagar Lakhimpur Kheri Lalitpur Lucknow (Capital) Maharajganj Mahoba Mainpuri Mathura Mau Meerut Mirzapur Moradabad Muzaffar Nagar Pilibhit Pratapgarh Prayagraj Raebareli Rampur Saharanpur Sambhal Sant Kabir Nagar Shahjahanpur Shamli Shravasti Siddharth Nagar Sitapur Sonbhadra Sultanpur Unnao Varanasi  
Respondent NameSUDHIR KUMAR SINGH
Petitioner’s AdvocateRACHNA GUPTA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
S.No. 6Diary Number7307 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-002535 / 202029-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTHOMAS LAWRENCE
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF KERALA
Petitioner’s AdvocateSRISHTI AGNIHOTRI
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
S.No. 7Diary Number8161 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003559-003559 / 202028-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSMRITISmriti Interpretation of Sruti (Vedas) by the help of Vedangas. Read Sruti. เคธเฅเคฎเฅƒเคคเคฟ Books :-ย เคฎเคจเฅ เคฏเคพเคœเฅเคžเคตเคฒเฅเค•เฅเคฏ เค…เคคเฅเคฐเคฟ เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคฃเฅ เคนเคพเคฐเฅ€เคค เค”เคถเคจเคธ เค…เค‚เค—เคฟเคฐเคพ เคฏเคฎย  เค•เคพเคคเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคจ เคฌเฅƒเคนเคธเฅเคชเคคเคฟ เคชเคฐเคพเคถเคฐ เคตเฅเคฏเคพเคธ เคฆเค•เฅเคท เค—เฅŒเคคเคฎ เคตเคถเคฟเคทเฅเค  เค†เคชเคธเฅเคคเคฎเฅเคฌ เคธเค‚เคตเคฐเฅเคค เคถเค‚เค–ย  เคฒเคฟเค–เคฟเคค เคฆเฅ‡เคตเคฒ เคถเคคเคพเคคเคช. Artha Shastra, Ayurveda etc MADAN KANSAGRA
Respondent NamePERRY KANSAGRA
Petitioner’s AdvocateNidhi Mohan Parashar
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
S.No. 8Diary Number8936 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000699-000699 / 202026-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameM RAVINDRAN
Respondent NameTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Petitioner’s AdvocateK. PAARI VENDHAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
S.No. 9Diary Number9217 / 2020
Case Number/ 015-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Respondent NameBHERULAL
Petitioner’s AdvocateARJUN GARG
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 10Diary Number9906 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003564-003564 / 202029-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameBALAJI BALIRAM MUPADE
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Petitioner’s AdvocateLAWYER S KNIT & CO
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 11Diary Number10353 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000667-000667 / 202012-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameBIKRAMJIT SINGH
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
Petitioner’s AdvocateSATYA MITRA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
S.No. 12Diary Number10709 / 2010
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000040-000040 / 201101-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameGURCHARAN SINGH
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
Petitioner’s AdvocateANIS AHMED KHAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
S.No. 13Diary Number10713 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000660-000662 / 202008-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Petitioner’s AdvocateKUNAL CHEEMA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
S.No. 14Diary Number10966 / 2020
Case NumberW.P.(C) No.-001131 / 202001-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NamePRAVASI LEGAL CELLCell The smallest unit that can live on its own and that makes up all living organisms and the tissues of the body. A cell has three main parts: the cell membrane, the nucleus, and the cytoplasm. The cell membrane surrounds the cell and controls the substances that go into and out of the cell. The nucleus is a structure inside the cell that contains the nucleolus and most of the cellโ€™s DNA. It is also where most RNA is made. The cytoplasm is the fluid inside the cell. It contains other tiny cell parts that have specific functions, including the Golgi complex, the mitochondria, and the endoplasmic reticulum. The cytoplasm is where most chemical reactions take place and where most proteins are made. The human body has more than 30 trillion cells.
Respondent NameUNION OF INDIAIndia Hind/ hend >hindia. Bharat Varsha (Jambudvipa used in Mahavamsha) is the name of this land mass. The people of this land are Sanatan Dharmin and they always defeated invaders. Indra (10000 yrs) was the oldest deified King of this land. Manu's jurisprudence enlitened this land. Vedas have been the civilizational literature of this land. Guiding principles of this land are : เคธเคคเฅเคฏเค‚ เคตเคฆ เฅค เคงเคฐเฅเคฎเค‚ เคšเคฐ เฅค เคธเฅเคตเคพเคงเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคพเคจเฅเคฎเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฎเคฆเคƒ เฅค The place also been called Hindusthan in Pesia. The word Hendu is mentioned in Avesta. Read more
Petitioner’s AdvocateJOSE ABRAHAM
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 15Diary Number11237 / 2020
Case NumberSLPSpecial Leave Petition A petition seeking grant of special leave to appeal may be rejected for several reasons. For example, it may be rejected (i) as barred by time, or (ii) being a defective presentation, (iii) the petitioner having no locus standi to file the petition, (iv) the conduct of the petitioner disentitling him to any indulgence by the Court, (iv) the question raised by the petitioner for consideration by this Court being not fit for consideration or deserving being dealt with by the Apex Court of the country and so on.(C) No.-006787-006788 / 202013-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameMUNIRAJU GOWDA P. M.
Respondent NameMUNIRATHNA
Petitioner’s AdvocateSHAILESH MADIYAL
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Judgment ByHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
S.No. 16Diary Number11439 / 2020
Case NumberW.P.(C) No.-000708 / 202001-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameGUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF GUJARAT
Petitioner’s AdvocateAPARNA BHAT
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 17Diary Number13204 / 2010
Case NumberC.A. No.-008980-008980 / 201701-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameM/S ARUN KUMAR KAMAL KUMAR .
Respondent NameM/S SELECTED MARBLE HOMEHome ฮ‘ฯฯ‡ฮนฮบฮฎ >   .
Petitioner’s AdvocateSURYA KANT
Respondent’s AdvocateASHWANI KUMAR
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAJustice Sanjiv Khanna Professional: Bar Council of Delhi in 1983. Employment: Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 18 January 2019 to 13 th May 2025. Education: Unknown
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
S.No. 18Diary Number13661 / 2020
Case NumberMA-001260 / 202013-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameCHOWGULE AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent NameGOA FOUNDATION
Petitioner’s AdvocatePAREKH & CO.
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Judgment ByHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
S.No. 19Diary Number15643 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000648-000648 / 202001-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NamePARVEZ NOORDIN LOKHANDWALLA
Respondent NameSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Petitioner’s AdvocateMANOJ K. MISHRA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 20Diary Number16205 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003518-003518 / 202026-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Respondent NameUNION OF INDIA
Petitioner’s AdvocateM. YOGESH KANNA
Respondent’s Advocate
Bench
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
S.No. 21Diary Number16959 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003397-003397 / 202009-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameBRANCH MANAGER
Respondent NameDALBIR KAUR
Petitioner’s AdvocatePRAGYA BAGHEL
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 22Diary Number17572 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003419-003419 / 202013-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameANIL BHARDWAJ
Respondent NameTHE HONBLE HIGH COURTHigh Court High Court Judges in England and Wales handle complex and tough cases, sitting in London and traveling to court centers around the country. They preside over serious criminal and important civil cases, and support the Lord and Lady Justices in hearing appeals. High Court Judges are commonly referred to as โ€˜Mr/Mrs/Ms Justice surnameโ€™ and are given the prefix โ€˜The Honourableโ€™. They are assigned to the Kingโ€™s Bench Division, the Family Division, or the Chancery Division. The Kingโ€™s Bench Division focuses on civil wrongs and judicial review, the Family Division deals with family law, and the Chancery Division handles various cases including company law and probate. Judges are appointed through a rigorous process overseen by the Judicial Appointments Commission. OF MADHYA PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateDANISHDenmark In 1848, absolute monarchy was abolished, and Denmark obtained its first Constitution and its first Government. Read More ZUBAIR KHAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 23Diary Number17992 / 2020
Case NumberSLP(C) No.-010482 / 202005-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameT.K. DAVID
Respondent NameKURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
Petitioner’s AdvocateRABIN MAJUMDER
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 24Diary Number18016 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000681-000682 / 202015-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSARAVANAN
Respondent NameSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Petitioner’s AdvocateSriram P.
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
S.No. 25Diary Number18115 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003345-003345 / 202009-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameNILAY GUPTA
Respondent NameCHAIRMAN NEET PG MEDICAL AND DENTAL ADMISSION/COUNSELLING BOARD 2020 AND PRINCIPAL GOVT. DENTAL COLLEGE
Petitioner’s AdvocateDEVENDRA SINGH
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
S.No. 26Diary Number18155 / 2010
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-002187-002188 / 201126-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameRAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateM. C. DHINGRA
Respondent’s AdvocateABHINAV MUKERJI
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTJustice Surya Kant Employment: Supreme Court of India on 24th May, 2019. Due to retire on 09th February, 2027. Education: Graduated from Government Post Graduate College, Hisar in 1981. Earned Bachelorโ€™s degree in Law in 1984 from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak. Masterโ€™s degree in Law in 2011 from the Directorate of Distance Education, Kurukshetra University, Kurkshetra.ย  Book/Essay written: Nil., HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
S.No. 27Diary Number18318 / 2007
Case NumberC.A. No.-013516-013516 / 201512-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameFERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD.
Respondent NameP.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS.
Petitioner’s AdvocateGEETHA KOVILAN
Respondent’s AdvocateVIKAS MEHTA
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
S.No. 28Diary Number18984 / 2020
Case NumberT.P.(C) No.-001034 / 202029-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameINSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA
Respondent NameLALIT KUMAR JAIN
Petitioner’s AdvocateVIKAS MEHTA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
S.No. 29Diary Number19080 / 2011
Case NumberC.A. No.-003438-003439 / 202014-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameHOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI
Respondent NameIN DEFENDENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS AND ORS
Petitioner’s AdvocateDIKSHA RAI
Respondent’s AdvocateCAVEATOR-IN-PERSON
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
S.No. 30Diary Number19366 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003493-003493 / 202016-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameNAVIN CHANDRA DHOUNDIYAL
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Petitioner’s AdvocateGAURAV GOEL
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
S.No. 31Diary Number19537 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000686-000686 / 202015-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSTATE OF U.PUttar Pradesh Ancient Aryavarta Region (เค†เคฐเฅเคฏเคพเคตเคฐเฅเคค) > District Agra Aligarh Ambedkar Nagar Amethi Amroha Auraiya Ayodhya (Saket) Azamgarh Baghpat Bahraich Ballia Balrampur Banda Barabanki Bareilly Basti Bhadohi Bijnor Budaun Bulandshahar Chandauli Chitrakoot Deoria Etah Etawah Farrukhabad Fatehpur Firozabad Gautam Buddha Nagar Ghaziabad Ghazipur Gonda Gorakhpur Hamirpur Hapur Hardoi Hathras Jalaun Jaunpur Jhansi Kannauj Kanpur Dehat Kanpur Nagar Kasganj Kaushambi Kushi Nagar Lakhimpur Kheri Lalitpur Lucknow (Capital) Maharajganj Mahoba Mainpuri Mathura Mau Meerut Mirzapur Moradabad Muzaffar Nagar Pilibhit Pratapgarh Prayagraj Raebareli Rampur Saharanpur Sambhal Sant Kabir Nagar Shahjahanpur Shamli Shravasti Siddharth Nagar Sitapur Sonbhadra Sultanpur Unnao Varanasi  .
Respondent NameGAYATRIGayatri Gayatri Mantraย  = เฅ เคญเฅ‚เคฐเฅเคญเฅเคตเฅ’เคธเฅเคธเฅเคตเคƒเฅ’ เคคเคฅเฅเคธเฅ‘เคตเคฟเฅ’เคคเฅเคฐเฅเคตเคฐเฅ‡แณšเคฃเฅเคฏเค‚เฅ’ เคญเคฐเฅเค—เฅ‹เฅ‘ เคฆเฅ‡เฅ’เคตเคธเฅเคฏเฅ‘ เคงเฅ€เคฎเคนเคฟ เฅค เคงเคฟเคฏเฅ‹เฅ’ เคฏเฅ‹ เคจเคƒเฅ‘ เคชเฅเคฐเคšเฅ‹เคฆเคฏเคพแณšเคคเฅ เฅฅ, Gayatri Chhanda (เค—เคพเคฏเคคเฅเคฐเฅ€ เค›เคจเฅเคฆ) = 24 letters in (3 X 8) system. Chhanda ( Vedic Poetic meter):ย  เค—เคพเคฏเคคเฅเคฐเฅเคฏเฅเคทเฅเคฃเคฟเค—เคจเฅเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคชเฅเคš เคฌเฅƒเคนเคคเฅ€ เคชเค™เฅเค•เฅเคคเคฟเคฐเฅ‡เคต เคš เฅฅ เฅง.เฅงเฅฏ เฅฅ เคคเฅเคฐเคฟเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคชเฅเคš เคœเค—เคคเฅ€ เคšเฅˆเคต เคคเคฅเคพเคฝเคคเคฟเคœเค—เคคเฅ€ เคฎเคคเคพ เฅค เคถเค•เฅเคตเคฐเฅ€ เคธเคพเคฝเคคเคฟเคชเฅ‚เคฐเฅเคตเคพ เคธเฅเคฏเคพเคฆเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคฏเคคเฅเคฏเคทเฅเคŸเฅ€ เคคเคคเคƒ เคธเฅเคฎเฅƒเคคเฅ‡ เฅฅ เฅง.เฅจเฅฆ เฅฅ (เคตเฅƒเคคเฅเคคเคฐเคคเฅเคจเคพเค•เคฐเคƒ ofย  Kedar Bhatta) PRASAD PRAJAPATI
Petitioner’s AdvocateGARIMA PRASHAD
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 32Diary Number19569 / 2020
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000680-000680 / 202014-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameGANESAN
Respondent NameSTATE REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Petitioner’s AdvocateG.SIVABALAMURUGAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
S.No. 33Diary Number20079 / 2018
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000860-000860 / 201907-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSATYA DEO ALIAS BHOOREY
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateTARUNA ARDHENDUMAULI PRASAD
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
S.No. 34Diary Number20887 / 2020
Case NumberC.A. No.-003539-003540 / 202026-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSURESH CHANDRA
Respondent NameJOGA SINGH BISHT
Petitioner’s AdvocateAyush Negi
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
S.No. 35Diary Number21305 / 2020
Case NumberW.P.(Crl.) No.-000296 / 202027-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSATYAMA DUBEY
Respondent NameUNION OF INDIA
Petitioner’s AdvocateSANJEEV MALHOTRA
Respondent’s AdvocateGARIMA PRASHAD
BenchHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Judgment ByHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
S.No. 36Diary Number24100 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003427-003427 / 202013-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameSUGANDHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Respondent NameP. RAJKUMAR REP. BY POWERPower The amount of energy transferred or converted per unit of time. In the International System of Units, the unit of it is the watt, equal to one joule per second. The capacity of energy infrastructure is rated using watts, which indicate its potential to supply or consume energy in a given period of time. A Power-plant rated at 100 MW has the potential to produce 100 MWh if it operates for one hour. AGENTAgent An agent is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons. The person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented, is called the principal. Indian Contract Act IMAMOLI
Petitioner’s AdvocateSHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR
Respondent’s Advocate
Bench
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
S.No. 37Diary Number25979 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003413-003413 / 202027-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameM/S L AND T HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Respondent NameM/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
Petitioner’s AdvocateMahesh Thakur
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
S.No. 38Diary Number26552 / 2018
Case NumberC.A. No.-002850-002850 / 202012-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameANAND YADAV
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateAMIT PAWAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 39Diary Number26682 / 2012
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000152-000152 / 201329-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTOFAN SINGH
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Petitioner’s AdvocatePRATIBHA JAIN
Respondent’s AdvocateB. KRISHNA PRASAD
Bench
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
S.No. 40Diary Number27398 / 2017
Case NumberSLP(C) No.-005467-005468 / 201913-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameHANUMAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS LRS
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Petitioner’s AdvocateS. N. BHAT
Respondent’s Advocate
Bench
Judgment ByHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
S.No. 41Diary Number27850 / 2009
Case NumberC.A. No.-001442-001442 / 201613-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameRAGHUNATH(D) BY LRS.
Respondent NameRADHA MOHAN (D) THR. LRS.
Petitioner’s AdvocateIRSHAD AHMAD
Respondent’s AdvocatePRATIBHA JAIN
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 42Diary Number29935 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003544-003545 / 202028-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameRITIKA SHARAN
Respondent NameSUJOY GHOSH
Petitioner’s AdvocateABHA R. SHARMA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 43Diary Number30601 / 2019
Case NumberT.P.(Crl.) No.-000534-000536 / 201916-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameUMESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent NameSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Petitioner’s AdvocateJAYANT MOHAN
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
S.No. 44Diary Number30869 / 2009
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000316-000316 / 201109-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameKARULAL
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION OFFICER
Petitioner’s AdvocateSANJAY SHARAWAT
Respondent’s AdvocateC. D. SINGH
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
S.No. 45Diary Number34078 / 2014
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000335-000335 / 201512-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameAMAR SINGH
Respondent NameTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Petitioner’s AdvocateNIKHIL GOEL
Respondent’s AdvocateB. KRISHNA PRASAD
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
S.No. 46Diary Number35346 / 2009
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-001392-001392 / 201129-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameCHUNTHURAM
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Petitioner’s Advocate
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
S.No. 47Diary Number40475 / 2019
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000659-000659 / 202008-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameMISS A
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateSATYA MITRA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
S.No. 48Diary Number41257 / 2018
Case NumberC.A. No.-005622-005622 / 201901-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameM/S MAGMA FINCORP LTD. (FORMERLY MAGMA LEASING LIMITED)
Respondent NameRAJESH KUMAR TIWARI
Petitioner’s AdvocateRAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 49Diary Number41305 / 2018
Case NumberC.A. No.-012202 / 201828-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameDHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateMrinal Gopal Elker
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
S.No. 50Diary Number41691 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003340-003340 / 202029-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Respondent NameHEEM SINGH
Petitioner’s AdvocateMILIND KUMAR
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Judgment ByHON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.No. 51Diary Number42308 / 2012
Case NumberCrl.A. No.-001032-001032 / 201326-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameRAJESH DHIMAN
Respondent NameTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Petitioner’s AdvocateSAURABH AJAY GUPTA
Respondent’s AdvocateABHINAV MUKERJI
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
S.No. 52Diary Number45157 / 2019
Case NumberC.A. No.-003489-003489 / 202015-10-2020 (English)
Petitioner NameRAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENTDevelopment ฮฑฮฝฮฌฯ€ฯ„ฯ…ฮพฮท AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONCorporation A legally established entity that can enter into contracts, own assets and incur debt, as well as sue and be suedโ€”all separately from its owner(s). The term covers both for-profit and nonprofit corporations and includes nonstock corporations, incorporated membership organizations, incorporated cooperatives, incorporated trade associations, professional corporations and, under certain circumstances, limited liability companies. LTD.
Respondent NamePIYUSH KANT SHARMA
Petitioner’s AdvocateDR.RAJEEV SHARMA
Respondent’s Advocate
BenchHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Judgment ByHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Top-10