SUPREME COURT OF INDIAArticle 124 of the Constitution of India Constitution of India > 124. Supreme Court (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges. (2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years: Provided that-- (a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office (b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4). (2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide. (3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and-- (a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or (b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such courts in succession; or (c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist. (4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-third of the members of the House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity. (5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehavior or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4): (6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule. (7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.
| S.No. 1 | Diary NumberNumber ฮฯฮนฮธฮผฯฯ | 689 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003483-003483 / 2020 | 15-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SATISH CHANDER AHUJA | |
| Respondent Name | SNEHA AHUJA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | S. S. JAUHAR | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJustice ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฮนฮฟฯฯฮฝฮท > judicature ( ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฮนฮฟฯฯฮฝฮท) > judge (ฮดฮนฮบฮฑฯฯฮฎฯ / ฮบฯฮนฯฮฎฯ). The whole purpose of Plato`s Republic is to search for Justice. The purpose of Justice is to establish a perfect State. The State of happiness (ฮตฯ ฯฯ ฯฮฏฮฑ) ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| JudgmentJudgment The statement given by the Judge on the grounds of a decree or order - CPC 2(9). It contains a concise statement of the case, points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision - Order 20 Rule 4(2).ย Section 354 of CrPC requires that every judgment shall contain points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision. Indian Supreme Court Decisions > Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts (Art 141 Indian Constitution) Civil and judicial authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court (Art 144) Supreme Court Network On Judiciary โ Portal > Denning: โJudges do not speak, as do actors, to please. They do not speak, as do advocates, to persuade. They do not speak, as do historians, to recount the past. They speak to give Judgment. And in their judgments, you will find passages, which are worthy to rank with the greatest literatureโฆ.โ Law Points on Judgment Writing > The judge must write to provide an easy-to-understand analysis of the issues of law and fact which arise for decision. Judgments are primarily meant for those whose cases are decided by judges (State Bank of India and Another Vs Ajay Kumar Sood SC 2022) By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 2 | Diary Number | 1747 / 2016 |
| Case Number | CONMT.PET.(C) No.-000034-000034 / 2016 | 09-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | ASHISH SETH | |
| Respondent Name | SUMIT MITTAL | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 3 | Diary Number | 2381 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003334-003334 / 2020 | 07-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | COMMISSIONER OF POLICE | |
| Respondent Name | UMESH KUMAR | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | B. V. BALARAM DAS | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 4 | Diary Number | 2418 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003282-003282 / 2020 | 07-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | AMIT SAHNI | |
| Respondent Name | COMMISSIONER OF POLICE | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PETITIONER-IN-PERSON | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAKrishna Author of Bhagavad Gita (3227-3102 BCE) > โเคเฅเคทเคฟเคฐเฅเคญเฅเคตเคพเคเคเค เคถเคฌเฅเคฆเค เคฃเคถเฅเค เคจเคฟเคฐเฅเคตเฅเคคเคฟเคตเคพเคเคเค เฅค เคคเคฏเฅเคฐเฅเคเฅเคฏเค เคชเคฐเค เคฌเฅเคฐเคนเฅเคฎ เคเฅเคทเฅเคฃเฅเคคเฅเคฏเคญเคฟเคงเฅเคฏเคคเฅโ| (โเคเฅเคทเฅเคฐเฅเคตเฅเคตเคฐเฅเคฃเฅโ เฅค เคเคฃเคพเค เฅฉ เฅค เฅช เฅค เคเคคเคฟ เคจเคเฅ เคคเคคเฅ เคฃเคคเฅเคตเคฎเฅ เฅค Similar:ย เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคฃเฅ เคจเคพเคฐเคพเคฏเคฃ เคเฅเคทเฅเคฃ เคตเฅเคเฅเคฃเฅเค เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคเคฐเคถเฅเคฐเคตเคธเฅ เคฆเคพเคฎเฅเคฆเคฐ เคนเฅเคทเฅเคเฅเคถ เคเฅเคถเคต เคฎเคพเคงเคต เคธเฅเคตเคญเฅ เคฆเฅเคคเฅเคฏเคพเคฐเคฟ เคชเฅเคฃเฅเคกเคฐเฅเคเคพเคเฅเคท เคเฅเคตเคฟเคจเฅเคฆ เคเคฐเฅเคกเคงเฅเคตเค เคชเฅเคคเคพเคฎเฅเคฌเคฐ เค เคเฅเคฏเฅเคค เคถเคพเคฐเฅเคเฅเคเคฟเคจเฅ เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคตเคเฅเคธเฅเคจ เคเคจเคพเคฐเฅเคฆเคจ เคเคชเฅเคจเฅเคฆเฅเคฐ เคเคจเฅเคฆเฅเคฐเคพเคตเคฐเค เคเคเฅเคฐเคชเคพเคฃเคฟ เคเคคเฅเคฐเฅเคญเฅเค เคชเคฆเฅเคฎเคจเคพเคญ เคฎเคงเฅเคฐเคฟเคชเฅ เคตเคพเคธเฅเคฆเฅเคต เคคเฅเคฐเคฟเคตเคฟเคเฅเคฐเคฎ เคฆเฅเคตเคเฅเคจเคจเฅเคฆเคจ เคถเฅเคฐเคฟ เคถเฅเคฐเฅเคชเคคเคฟ เคชเฅเคฐเฅเคทเฅเคคเฅเคคเคฎ เคตเคจเคฎเคพเคฒเคฟเคจเฅ เคฌเคฒเคฟเคงเฅเคตเคเคธเคฟเคจเฅ เคเคเคธเคพเคฐเคพเคคเคฟ เค เคงเฅเคเฅเคทเค เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคตเคฎเฅเคญเคฐ เคเฅเคเคญเคเคฟเคคเฅ เคตเคฟเคงเฅ เคถเฅเคฐเฅเคตเคคเฅเคธเคฒเคพเคเฅเคเคจ เคชเฅเคฐเคพเคฃเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคท เคฏเคเฅเคเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคท เคจเคฐเคเคพเคจเฅเคคเค เคเคฒเคถเคพเคฏเคฟเคจเฅ เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคตเคฐเฅเคช เคฎเฅเคเฅเคจเฅเคฆ เคฎเฅเคฐเคฎเคฐเฅเคฆเคจ เคฒเคเฅเคทเฅเคฎเฅเคชเคคเคฟ เคฎเฅเคฐเคพเคฐเคฟ เค เค เค เคเคฟเคค เค เคตเฅเคฏเคเฅเคค เคตเฅเคทเคพเคเคชเคฟ เคฌเคญเฅเคฐเฅ เคนเคฐเคฟ เคตเฅเคงเคธเฅ | MURARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYJustice Hrishikesh Roy Employment: On 23rd September, 2019, appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. Education: He obtained his LL.B Degree from Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi in 1982. Book/essay written: Nil | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 5 | Diary Number | 6045 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003498-003498 / 2020 | 16-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHUttar Pradesh Ancient Aryavarta Region (เคเคฐเฅเคฏเคพเคตเคฐเฅเคค) > District Agra Aligarh Ambedkar Nagar Amethi Amroha Auraiya Ayodhya (Saket) Azamgarh Baghpat Bahraich Ballia Balrampur Banda Barabanki Bareilly Basti Bhadohi Bijnor Budaun Bulandshahar Chandauli Chitrakoot Deoria Etah Etawah Farrukhabad Fatehpur Firozabad Gautam Buddha Nagar Ghaziabad Ghazipur Gonda Gorakhpur Hamirpur Hapur Hardoi Hathras Jalaun Jaunpur Jhansi Kannauj Kanpur Dehat Kanpur Nagar Kasganj Kaushambi Kushi Nagar Lakhimpur Kheri Lalitpur Lucknow (Capital) Maharajganj Mahoba Mainpuri Mathura Mau Meerut Mirzapur Moradabad Muzaffar Nagar Pilibhit Pratapgarh Prayagraj Raebareli Rampur Saharanpur Sambhal Sant Kabir Nagar Shahjahanpur Shamli Shravasti Siddharth Nagar Sitapur Sonbhadra Sultanpur Unnao Varanasi | |
| Respondent Name | SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RACHNA GUPTA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |
| S.No. 6 | Diary Number | 7307 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-002535 / 2020 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | THOMAS LAWRENCE | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF KERALA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SRISHTI AGNIHOTRI | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |
| S.No. 7 | Diary Number | 8161 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003559-003559 / 2020 | 28-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SMRITISmriti Interpretation of Sruti (Vedas) by the help of Vedangas. Read Sruti. เคธเฅเคฎเฅเคคเคฟ Books :-ย เคฎเคจเฅ เคฏเคพเคเฅเคเคตเคฒเฅเคเฅเคฏ เค เคคเฅเคฐเคฟ เคตเคฟเคทเฅเคฃเฅ เคนเคพเคฐเฅเคค เคเคถเคจเคธ เค เคเคเคฟเคฐเคพ เคฏเคฎย เคเคพเคคเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคจ เคฌเฅเคนเคธเฅเคชเคคเคฟ เคชเคฐเคพเคถเคฐ เคตเฅเคฏเคพเคธ เคฆเคเฅเคท เคเฅเคคเคฎ เคตเคถเคฟเคทเฅเค เคเคชเคธเฅเคคเคฎเฅเคฌ เคธเคเคตเคฐเฅเคค เคถเคเคย เคฒเคฟเคเคฟเคค เคฆเฅเคตเคฒ เคถเคคเคพเคคเคช. Artha Shastra, Ayurveda etc MADAN KANSAGRA | |
| Respondent Name | PERRY KANSAGRA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Nidhi Mohan Parashar | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | |
| S.No. 8 | Diary Number | 8936 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000699-000699 / 2020 | 26-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | M RAVINDRAN | |
| Respondent Name | THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | K. PAARI VENDHAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | |
| S.No. 9 | Diary Number | 9217 / 2020 |
| Case Number | / 0 | 15-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | |
| Respondent Name | BHERULAL | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ARJUN GARG | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 10 | Diary Number | 9906 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003564-003564 / 2020 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | BALAJI BALIRAM MUPADE | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | LAWYER S KNIT & CO | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 11 | Diary Number | 10353 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000667-000667 / 2020 | 12-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | BIKRAMJIT SINGH | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF PUNJAB | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SATYA MITRA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |
| S.No. 12 | Diary Number | 10709 / 2010 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000040-000040 / 2011 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | GURCHARAN SINGH | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF PUNJAB | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIS AHMED KHAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| S.No. 13 | Diary Number | 10713 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000660-000662 / 2020 | 08-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | ANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KUNAL CHEEMA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | |
| S.No. 14 | Diary Number | 10966 / 2020 |
| Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-001131 / 2020 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | PRAVASI LEGAL CELLCell The smallest unit that can live on its own and that makes up all living organisms and the tissues of the body. A cell has three main parts: the cell membrane, the nucleus, and the cytoplasm. The cell membrane surrounds the cell and controls the substances that go into and out of the cell. The nucleus is a structure inside the cell that contains the nucleolus and most of the cellโs DNA. It is also where most RNA is made. The cytoplasm is the fluid inside the cell. It contains other tiny cell parts that have specific functions, including the Golgi complex, the mitochondria, and the endoplasmic reticulum. The cytoplasm is where most chemical reactions take place and where most proteins are made. The human body has more than 30 trillion cells. | |
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIAIndia Hind/ hend >hindia. Bharat Varsha (Jambudvipa used in Mahavamsha) is the name of this land mass. The people of this land are Sanatan Dharmin and they always defeated invaders. Indra (10000 yrs) was the oldest deified King of this land. Manu's jurisprudence enlitened this land. Vedas have been the civilizational literature of this land. Guiding principles of this land are : เคธเคคเฅเคฏเค เคตเคฆ เฅค เคงเคฐเฅเคฎเค เคเคฐ เฅค เคธเฅเคตเคพเคงเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคพเคจเฅเคฎเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฎเคฆเค เฅค The place also been called Hindusthan in Pesia. The word Hendu is mentioned in Avesta. Read more | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | JOSE ABRAHAM | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 15 | Diary Number | 11237 / 2020 |
| Case Number | SLPSpecial Leave Petition A petition seeking grant of special leave to appeal may be rejected for several reasons. For example, it may be rejected (i) as barred by time, or (ii) being a defective presentation, (iii) the petitioner having no locus standi to file the petition, (iv) the conduct of the petitioner disentitling him to any indulgence by the Court, (iv) the question raised by the petitioner for consideration by this Court being not fit for consideration or deserving being dealt with by the Apex Court of the country and so on.(C) No.-006787-006788 / 2020 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | MUNIRAJU GOWDA P. M. | |
| Respondent Name | MUNIRATHNA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHAILESH MADIYAL | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | |
| S.No. 16 | Diary Number | 11439 / 2020 |
| Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-000708 / 2020 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | GUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | APARNA BHAT | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 17 | Diary Number | 13204 / 2010 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008980-008980 / 2017 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | M/S ARUN KUMAR KAMAL KUMAR . | |
| Respondent Name | M/S SELECTED MARBLE HOMEHome ฮฯฯฮนฮบฮฎ > . | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SURYA KANT | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ASHWANI KUMAR | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAJustice Sanjiv Khanna Professional: Bar Council of Delhi in 1983. Employment: Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 18 January 2019 to 13 th May 2025. Education: Unknown | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER | |
| S.No. 18 | Diary Number | 13661 / 2020 |
| Case Number | MA-001260 / 2020 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | CHOWGULE AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED | |
| Respondent Name | GOA FOUNDATION | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PAREKH & CO. | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | |
| S.No. 19 | Diary Number | 15643 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000648-000648 / 2020 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | PARVEZ NOORDIN LOKHANDWALLA | |
| Respondent Name | STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | MANOJ K. MISHRA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 20 | Diary Number | 16205 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003518-003518 / 2020 | 26-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU | |
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M. YOGESH KANNA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | |
| S.No. 21 | Diary Number | 16959 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003397-003397 / 2020 | 09-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | BRANCH MANAGER | |
| Respondent Name | DALBIR KAUR | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PRAGYA BAGHEL | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 22 | Diary Number | 17572 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003419-003419 / 2020 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | ANIL BHARDWAJ | |
| Respondent Name | THE HONBLE HIGH COURTHigh Court High Court Judges in England and Wales handle complex and tough cases, sitting in London and traveling to court centers around the country. They preside over serious criminal and important civil cases, and support the Lord and Lady Justices in hearing appeals. High Court Judges are commonly referred to as โMr/Mrs/Ms Justice surnameโ and are given the prefix โThe Honourableโ. They are assigned to the Kingโs Bench Division, the Family Division, or the Chancery Division. The Kingโs Bench Division focuses on civil wrongs and judicial review, the Family Division deals with family law, and the Chancery Division handles various cases including company law and probate. Judges are appointed through a rigorous process overseen by the Judicial Appointments Commission. OF MADHYA PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DANISHDenmark In 1848, absolute monarchy was abolished, and Denmark obtained its first Constitution and its first Government. Read More ZUBAIR KHAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 23 | Diary Number | 17992 / 2020 |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-010482 / 2020 | 05-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | T.K. DAVID | |
| Respondent Name | KURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD. | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RABIN MAJUMDER | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 24 | Diary Number | 18016 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000681-000682 / 2020 | 15-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SARAVANAN | |
| Respondent Name | STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Sriram P. | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| S.No. 25 | Diary Number | 18115 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003345-003345 / 2020 | 09-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | NILAY GUPTA | |
| Respondent Name | CHAIRMAN NEET PG MEDICAL AND DENTAL ADMISSION/COUNSELLING BOARD 2020 AND PRINCIPAL GOVT. DENTAL COLLEGE | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DEVENDRA SINGH | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | |
| S.No. 26 | Diary Number | 18155 / 2010 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-002187-002188 / 2011 | 26-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | RAVEEN KUMAR | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M. C. DHINGRA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ABHINAV MUKERJI | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTJustice Surya Kant Employment: Supreme Court of India on 24th May, 2019. Due to retire on 09th February, 2027. Education: Graduated from Government Post Graduate College, Hisar in 1981. Earned Bachelorโs degree in Law in 1984 from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak. Masterโs degree in Law in 2011 from the Directorate of Distance Education, Kurukshetra University, Kurkshetra.ย Book/Essay written: Nil., HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | |
| S.No. 27 | Diary Number | 18318 / 2007 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-013516-013516 / 2015 | 12-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. | |
| Respondent Name | P.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS. | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GEETHA KOVILAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | VIKAS MEHTA | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |
| S.No. 28 | Diary Number | 18984 / 2020 |
| Case Number | T.P.(C) No.-001034 / 2020 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA | |
| Respondent Name | LALIT KUMAR JAIN | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | VIKAS MEHTA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | |
| S.No. 29 | Diary Number | 19080 / 2011 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003438-003439 / 2020 | 14-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI | |
| Respondent Name | IN DEFENDENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS AND ORS | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DIKSHA RAI | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER | |
| S.No. 30 | Diary Number | 19366 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003493-003493 / 2020 | 16-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | NAVIN CHANDRA DHOUNDIYAL | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GAURAV GOEL | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | |
| S.No. 31 | Diary Number | 19537 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000686-000686 / 2020 | 15-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | STATE OF U.PUttar Pradesh Ancient Aryavarta Region (เคเคฐเฅเคฏเคพเคตเคฐเฅเคค) > District Agra Aligarh Ambedkar Nagar Amethi Amroha Auraiya Ayodhya (Saket) Azamgarh Baghpat Bahraich Ballia Balrampur Banda Barabanki Bareilly Basti Bhadohi Bijnor Budaun Bulandshahar Chandauli Chitrakoot Deoria Etah Etawah Farrukhabad Fatehpur Firozabad Gautam Buddha Nagar Ghaziabad Ghazipur Gonda Gorakhpur Hamirpur Hapur Hardoi Hathras Jalaun Jaunpur Jhansi Kannauj Kanpur Dehat Kanpur Nagar Kasganj Kaushambi Kushi Nagar Lakhimpur Kheri Lalitpur Lucknow (Capital) Maharajganj Mahoba Mainpuri Mathura Mau Meerut Mirzapur Moradabad Muzaffar Nagar Pilibhit Pratapgarh Prayagraj Raebareli Rampur Saharanpur Sambhal Sant Kabir Nagar Shahjahanpur Shamli Shravasti Siddharth Nagar Sitapur Sonbhadra Sultanpur Unnao Varanasi . | |
| Respondent Name | GAYATRIGayatri Gayatri Mantraย = เฅ เคญเฅเคฐเฅเคญเฅเคตเฅเคธเฅเคธเฅเคตเคเฅ เคคเคฅเฅเคธเฅเคตเคฟเฅเคคเฅเคฐเฅเคตเคฐเฅแณเคฃเฅเคฏเคเฅ เคญเคฐเฅเคเฅเฅ เคฆเฅเฅเคตเคธเฅเคฏเฅ เคงเฅเคฎเคนเคฟ เฅค เคงเคฟเคฏเฅเฅ เคฏเฅ เคจเคเฅ เคชเฅเคฐเคเฅเคฆเคฏเคพแณเคคเฅ เฅฅ, Gayatri Chhanda (เคเคพเคฏเคคเฅเคฐเฅ เคเคจเฅเคฆ) = 24 letters in (3 X 8) system. Chhanda ( Vedic Poetic meter):ย เคเคพเคฏเคคเฅเคฐเฅเคฏเฅเคทเฅเคฃเคฟเคเคจเฅเคทเฅเคเฅเคชเฅเค เคฌเฅเคนเคคเฅ เคชเคเฅเคเฅเคคเคฟเคฐเฅเคต เค เฅฅ เฅง.เฅงเฅฏ เฅฅ เคคเฅเคฐเคฟเคทเฅเคเฅเคชเฅเค เคเคเคคเฅ เคเฅเคต เคคเคฅเคพเคฝเคคเคฟเคเคเคคเฅ เคฎเคคเคพ เฅค เคถเคเฅเคตเคฐเฅ เคธเคพเคฝเคคเคฟเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคตเคพ เคธเฅเคฏเคพเคฆเคทเฅเคเฅเคฏเคคเฅเคฏเคทเฅเคเฅ เคคเคคเค เคธเฅเคฎเฅเคคเฅ เฅฅ เฅง.เฅจเฅฆ เฅฅ (เคตเฅเคคเฅเคคเคฐเคคเฅเคจเคพเคเคฐเค ofย Kedar Bhatta) PRASAD PRAJAPATI | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GARIMA PRASHAD | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 32 | Diary Number | 19569 / 2020 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000680-000680 / 2020 | 14-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | GANESAN | |
| Respondent Name | STATE REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | G.SIVABALAMURUGAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | |
| S.No. 33 | Diary Number | 20079 / 2018 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000860-000860 / 2019 | 07-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SATYA DEO ALIAS BHOOREY | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | TARUNA ARDHENDUMAULI PRASAD | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | |
| S.No. 34 | Diary Number | 20887 / 2020 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003539-003540 / 2020 | 26-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SURESH CHANDRA | |
| Respondent Name | JOGA SINGH BISHT | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Ayush Negi | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | |
| S.No. 35 | Diary Number | 21305 / 2020 |
| Case Number | W.P.(Crl.) No.-000296 / 2020 | 27-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SATYAMA DUBEY | |
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJEEV MALHOTRA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | GARIMA PRASHAD | |
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | |
| S.No. 36 | Diary Number | 24100 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003427-003427 / 2020 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | SUGANDHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. | |
| Respondent Name | P. RAJKUMAR REP. BY POWERPower The amount of energy transferred or converted per unit of time. In the International System of Units, the unit of it is the watt, equal to one joule per second. The capacity of energy infrastructure is rated using watts, which indicate its potential to supply or consume energy in a given period of time. A Power-plant rated at 100 MW has the potential to produce 100 MWh if it operates for one hour. AGENTAgent An agent is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons. The person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented, is called the principal. Indian Contract Act IMAMOLI | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER | |
| S.No. 37 | Diary Number | 25979 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003413-003413 / 2020 | 27-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | M/S L AND T HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED | |
| Respondent Name | M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Mahesh Thakur | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | |
| S.No. 38 | Diary Number | 26552 / 2018 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-002850-002850 / 2020 | 12-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | ANAND YADAV | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | AMIT PAWAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 39 | Diary Number | 26682 / 2012 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000152-000152 / 2013 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | TOFAN SINGH | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PRATIBHA JAIN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | B. KRISHNA PRASAD | |
| Bench | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |
| S.No. 40 | Diary Number | 27398 / 2017 |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-005467-005468 / 2019 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | HANUMAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS LRS | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF KARNATAKA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | S. N. BHAT | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | |
| S.No. 41 | Diary Number | 27850 / 2009 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-001442-001442 / 2016 | 13-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | RAGHUNATH(D) BY LRS. | |
| Respondent Name | RADHA MOHAN (D) THR. LRS. | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | IRSHAD AHMAD | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | PRATIBHA JAIN | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 42 | Diary Number | 29935 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003544-003545 / 2020 | 28-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | RITIKA SHARAN | |
| Respondent Name | SUJOY GHOSH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ABHA R. SHARMA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 43 | Diary Number | 30601 / 2019 |
| Case Number | T.P.(Crl.) No.-000534-000536 / 2019 | 16-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | UMESH KUMAR SHARMA | |
| Respondent Name | STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | JAYANT MOHAN | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| S.No. 44 | Diary Number | 30869 / 2009 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000316-000316 / 2011 | 09-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | KARULAL | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION OFFICER | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJAY SHARAWAT | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | C. D. SINGH | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| S.No. 45 | Diary Number | 34078 / 2014 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000335-000335 / 2015 | 12-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | AMAR SINGH | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | NIKHIL GOEL | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | B. KRISHNA PRASAD | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | |
| S.No. 46 | Diary Number | 35346 / 2009 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001392-001392 / 2011 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | CHUNTHURAM | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| S.No. 47 | Diary Number | 40475 / 2019 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000659-000659 / 2020 | 08-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | MISS A | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SATYA MITRA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | |
| S.No. 48 | Diary Number | 41257 / 2018 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-005622-005622 / 2019 | 01-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | M/S MAGMA FINCORP LTD. (FORMERLY MAGMA LEASING LIMITED) | |
| Respondent Name | RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 49 | Diary Number | 41305 / 2018 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-012202 / 2018 | 28-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Mrinal Gopal Elker | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | |
| S.No. 50 | Diary Number | 41691 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003340-003340 / 2020 | 29-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN | |
| Respondent Name | HEEM SINGH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | MILIND KUMAR | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | |
| S.No. 51 | Diary Number | 42308 / 2012 |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001032-001032 / 2013 | 26-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | RAJESH DHIMAN | |
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SAURABH AJAY GUPTA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ABHINAV MUKERJI | |
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | |
| S.No. 52 | Diary Number | 45157 / 2019 |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003489-003489 / 2020 | 15-10-2020 (English) |
| Petitioner Name | RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENTDevelopment ฮฑฮฝฮฌฯฯฯ ฮพฮท AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONCorporation A legally established entity that can enter into contracts, own assets and incur debt, as well as sue and be suedโall separately from its owner(s). The term covers both for-profit and nonprofit corporations and includes nonstock corporations, incorporated membership organizations, incorporated cooperatives, incorporated trade associations, professional corporations and, under certain circumstances, limited liability companies. LTD. | |
| Respondent Name | PIYUSH KANT SHARMA | |
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DR.RAJEEV SHARMA | |
| Respondent’s Advocate | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | |
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH |
More Stories
Supreme Court Daily Digest (26th Jan 2026)
Analysis of Section 8(1)(j), Right to Information Act, 2005
ย Judicial office is essentially a public trust: Supreme Court