INFORMATION TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE POLICE IN CASES OF SUSPECTED HUMANHuman Ο άνθρωπος (Humanum> Homo sapiens) मानव:. We have failed to consider the minimum need to be a 'human'. For Christians, human beings are sinful creatures, who need some saviour. For Evolution biology a man is still evolving, for what, we don´t know. For Buddhist Nagarjuna, the realisation of having a human body is a mere mental illusion. We are not ready to accept that a human is a computer made of meat. For a slave master, a human person is another animal, his sons and daughters are his personal property. POISONING
(i) Name, sex and age of patient
(ii) Nature of food last taken
(iii) How soon after this meal did the symptoms of poisoning begin?
(iv) Did the patient walk from the place where first taken ill, if so, how far?
(v) Did the patient complain of pain or discomfort?
(vi) Was there purging?
(vii) Was there vomiting?
(viii) Did the patient become unconscious, if so, how soon did this occur,
after the onset of the symptoms?
(ix) Was the patient dizzy or faint?
(x) Did convulsion or cramps occur?
(xi) Was tingling of skin or throat complained of?
(xii) Did the patient talk sensibly or foolishly?
(xiii) Did the patient pick at objects on the ground or bed?
(xiv) Was any treatment adopted, if so, what was its nature?
(xv) Did death occur, and, if so, how soon after the illness began?
(xvi) What poison was supposed to have been used?
Signature of the police officialOffice Αξίωμα > Officer > Office-bearer (1593) > Opus, officium, ex officio (Latin). Box-office (Cash Box). and date
Note- Wherever possible a report by a medical official who has been the case should be added which should contain his opinionOpinion A judge's written explanation of a decision of the court. In an appeal, multiple opinions may be written. The court’s ruling comes from a majority of judges and forms the majority opinion. A dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority because of the reasoning and/or the principles of law on which the decision is based. A concurring opinion agrees with the end result of the court but offers further comment possibly because they disagree with how the court reached its conclusion. as to the nature of the poison used. Any information given by friends and neighbours should be noted.
SOURCE: UP POLICE
