Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Dept. of Justice v. Reporters Committee To begin with, both the common law and the literal understandings of privacy encompass the individual’s control of […]
US Freedom of Information Act-Sec 552 – Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings
Section 552 – Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings Freedom of Information Act (a) Each agency shall make available to the public information as follows: (1) Each agency shall separately state […]
Steve Gupta, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, et seq. (“FOIA”), seeking documents about Rahul Gandhi’s alleged detention at Logan Airport in September 2001. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
If The information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules, the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to.Rule 151 of the Gujarat High Court Rules stipulating a third party to have access to the information/obtaining the certified copies of the documents or orders requires to file an application/affidavit stating the reasons for seeking the information, is not inconsistent with the provisions of the RTI Act;