Bangladesh Supreme Court

Wherever income & expenditure of public money is involved, CAG has power & authority to conduct audit – Bangladesh SC (04/01/2022)

advtanmoy 21/04/2023

The moot question in this case as to whether notice issued under section 120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 pursuant to the audit report of the concerned Local Office of the
Comptroller and Auditor-General of Bangladesh (CAG) is lawful or not and whether the Comptroller and Auditor General has any jurisdiction to direct any of his officers to audit tax receipts or refunds.

Death is irremediable, it goes beyond the world – Sentence of death is commuted into jail for life by Bangladesh SC (31/05/2022)

advtanmoy 21/04/2023

In view the facts and circumstances of the case it is found that the trial court was correct in its decision
convicting the appellant and subsequently High Court Division affirmed the same and we also give our opinion that the appellant was rightly found guilty by both the courts below but we think that justice would be made if the sentence of death is commuted into imprisonment for life

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates