(1956) AIR(SC) 197 : (1956) CriLJ 421 : (1956) SCA 706 : (1956) SCJ 236 : (1955) 2 SCR 1101 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ( Before : Sudhi Ranjan Das, […]
Whether the detention order suffers from non-application of mind by the detaining authority is not a matter to be examined according to any straitjacket formula or set principles. It depends on the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the activities alleged against the detenu, the materials collected in support of such allegations, the propensity and potentiality of the detenu in indulging in such activities etc.
Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & ANR Vs. Kamala & ANR[ALL SC 2018 APRIL]
KEYWORDS:-detention order – DATE:-April 10, 2018- The COFEPOSA Act did not require the detaining authority to mention the period of detention in the order of detention. When no period is mentioned in […]
KEYWORDS:- DETENTION- ORDINANCE MAKING POWER OF GOVERNOR-GENERAL- DATE:- 3rd June 1943 In accordance with British Jurisprudence no member of the executive can interfere with the liberty or property of a British subject except […]
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous
Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and
Dangerous Persons Act, 1981