Skip to content

ADVOCATETANMOY LAW LIBRARY

Research & Library Database

Primary Menu
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Countries198
    • National Constitutions: History, Purpose, and Key Aspects
  • Judgment
  • Book
  • Legal Brief
    • Legal Eagal
  • LearnToday
  • HLJ
    • Supreme Court Case Notes
    • Daily Digest
  • Sarvarthapedia
    • Sarvarthapedia (Core Areas)
    • Systemic-and-systematic
    • Volume One
05/04/2026
  • Law Library

No Role of Indian Immigration in Nepali Traveler Case

The Ministry of Home Affairs clarified that a Nepali citizen, Ms. Shambhavi Adhikari, was returned to Kathmandu from Delhi's airport due to visa validity issues identified by the airline, not immigration. The incident was misrepresented as discriminatory. Indian immigration played no role, emphasizing India-Nepal's strong relationship and absence of bias.
advtanmoy 02/11/2025 2 minutes read

ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Nepal

Home ยป Law Library Updates ยป Sarvarthapedia ยป News ยป No Role of Indian Immigration in Nepali Traveler Case

Ministry of Home Affairs clarifies that the airline, not immigration, stopped a Nepali citizenโ€™s transit due to visa validity concerns.

It has been reported that Ms. Shambhavi Adhikari, a citizen of Nepal traveling to Berlin, was stopped at Delhiโ€™s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) and sent back to Kathmandu. The incident has been wrongly portrayed as biased or discriminatory against Nepali citizens.

It is clarified on 1st November 2025 that Indian immigration authorities had no role in this matter. The passenger arrived from Kathmandu by Air India and was transiting through Delhi. She was stopped while boarding her connecting Qatar Airways flight. The airline decided not to allow her to continue her journey to Germany due to visa validity issues and flew her back to Kathmandu.

Such actions are taken in accordance with the destination countryโ€™s travel requirements. She later rescheduled her travel and flew to Germany via another route from Kathmandu.

Read Next

  • 2016 Report of Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India
  • THE NATIONAL SPORTS GOVERNANCE ACT, 2025
  • The Number ฯ€ (Pi): History, Properties, and Importance in Mathematics

International transit passengers are not required to approach Indian immigration for their onward journey. This issue was strictly between the airline and the passenger, with no involvement from Indian immigration authorities. India values its strong and friendly relationship with Nepal and reaffirms that no Indian authority holds any bias or discrimination against citizens of Nepal.


Tags: 2nd November Immigration laws India-2025 Nepal

Post navigation

Previous: 28th China-ASEAN Summit: Chinese Premier Li Qiang`s Remarks
Next: Iran, Russia to Sign Deal for Small Nuclear Power Plants
Arrest
Sarvarthapedia

Latin Maxims in Criminal Law: Meaning, Usage, and Courtroom Application

Sarvarthapedia
Sarvarthapedia

Research Methodology and Investigation: Concepts, Frameworks, and Emerging Trends

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

Origin of Central Banking in India: From Hastings to RBI and the History of Preparatory Years (1773โ€“1934)

Howrah District Environment Plan: Waste Management, Water Quality & Wetland Conservation

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Sections (1-358), Punishments, and Legal Framework

Bengali Food Culture: History, Traditions, and Class Influences

West Bengal Court-Fees Act, 1970: Fees, Schedules, and Procedures

WB Land Reforms Tribunal Act 1997: History, Features, Provisions, Structure, Powers and Functions

Civil Procedure Law of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1976)

Knowledge Management in the Modern Era: From History to Digital Transformation

  • Sarvarthapedia

  • Delhi Law Digest

  • Howrah Law Journal

  • Amit Aryaย vs Kamlesh Kumari:ย Doctrine of merger
  • David Vs. Kuruppampady: SLP against rejecting review by HC (2020)
  • Nazim & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1184)
  • Geeta v. Ajay: Expense for daughter`s marriage allowed in favour of the wife
  • Ram v. Sukhram: Tribal women’s right in ancestral property [2025] 8 SCR 272
  • Naresh vs Aarti: Cheque Bouncing Complaint Filed by POA (02/01/2025)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA): Indian Rules for Evidence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
  • The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
  • Supreme Court Daily Digest
  • U.S. Supreme Court Orders
  • U.k. Supreme Court Orders
Sarvarthapedia, Law and Legal Materials

Rule of Law vs Rule by Law and Rule for Law: History, Meaning, and Global Evolution

Indian Government

IPS Cadre Strength 2025: State-wise Authorised Strength

Sarvarthapedia

Uric Acid: From 18th Century Discovery to Modern Medical Science

Christian Education

Christian Approaches to Interfaith Dialogue: Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, and Pentecostal Views

2026 ยฉ Advocatetanmoy Law Library

  • About
  • Global Index
  • Judicial Examinations
  • Indian Statutes
  • Glossary
  • Legal Eagle
  • Subject Guide
  • Journal
  • SCCN
  • Constitutions
  • Legal Brief (SC)
  • MCQs (Indian Laws)
  • Sarvarthapedia (Articles)
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
  • Library Updates