To appreciate the merits , we may consider marking of documents during cross examination by showing the documents to the witness. The documents in the possession of the cross-examiner may either be admissible in itself or inadmissible. In a...
Cross Examination
Trial—Delay in proceeding-Whenever an objection is raised during evidence taking stage regarding the admissibility of any material or item of oral evidence the trial Court can make a note of such objection and mark the objected document tentatively as...
Evidence Act-Section 137 does not say that such cross-examination has to be limited only to what has been stated by the prosecution witness in examination-in-chief. AIR 1961 SC 175 : (1961) 1 CriLJ SC 315 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA...
Cross-Examination a. Cross-examination must be related to relevant facts but unlike re-examination, it need not be confined to facts deposed to in the preceding examination (Section 138). Further it differs from both of them in as much as leading...
Evi. Act S.165 and 137: Witness in a bit of confusion during his cross-examination – Not improper for trial Court to put questions during his cross-examination to elicit truth: A judge is expected to actively participate in the trial,...
Examination of a witness by the adverse party is called the cross-examination. It is the most effective of all the means for extracting truth and exposing falsehood. It is a greatest legal engine ever invented for discovery of truth....
The appellant has not been able to shake the credibility of the eye-witness. No material contradiction in the case of the prosecution has been shown. Under facts and circumstances, non-examination of Investigating Officer is of no consequence. Accused failed to show prejudice by such non-examination
You must be logged in to post a comment.