Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Current Judgments
-
State of West Bengal and others Versus Swapan Kumar Guha and others [2/2/1982]
Whether an offence has been disclosed or not must necessarily depend on the facts and circumstances of each particular case. In considering whether an offence into which an investigation is made or to be made, is disclosed or not, the…
-
State of West Bengal and others Vs Sampat Lal and others-04/12/1984
It is certainly not for this Court at the present stage to examine and come to a conclusion as to whether this was a case of suicide or murder. If as a result of investigation, evidence is gathered and a…
-
State of West Bengal Vs Subodh Gopal Bose and others-17/12/1953
Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 19-Article 31(1), though part of an Article is in essence an independent provision to some extent overlapping with the requirements of the law of the Eminent Domain. It is on a par with Art. 21.
-
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Vs. THE DALHOUSIE INSTITUTE SOCIETY
Adverse Possession- “the position of the respondent Corporation and its predecessor in title was that of a person having no legal title but nevertheless holding possession of the land under colour of an invalid grant of the land in perpetuity…
-
State represented by Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. M. Subrahmanyam – 07/05/19
Section 173(2)(5)(a), Cr.P.C- The failure to bring the authorisation on record, as observed, was more a matter of procedure, which is but a handmaid of justice. Substantive justice must always prevail over procedural or technical justice. To hold that failure…
-
Station House Officer CBI/ACB/Bangalore vs. B.A. Srinivasan – 05/12/2019
Sanction u/s Section 197 CrPC when not required- From a perusal of the case law referred to supra, it becomes clear that for the purpose of obtaining previous sanction from the appropriate Government under Section 197 CrPC, it is imperative…
-
Sudam @ Rahul Kaniram Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra-01/10/2019
The review petitions are allowed to the extent that the sentence of death awarded to the Petitioner is commuted to imprisonment for the remainder of his life sans any right to remission.
-
Sudhamayee Pattnaik and Ors. Vs. Bibhu Prasad Sahoo and Ors (16/09/2022)
Suit is for declaration, permanent injunction and recovery of possession-The plaintiffs are the domius litis. Unless the court suo motu directs to join any other person not party to the suit for effective decree and/or for proper adjudication as per…
-
Suhelkhan Khudyarkhan and Another Versus State of Maharashtra and others-15/04/2009
To bring in application of Section 133 of the Code, there must be imminent danger to the property and consequential nuisance to the public. The nuisance is the concomitant act resulting in danger to the life or property due to…
-
Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs Randhir Singh and Others- 29/03/2010
Cancellation of the deed: If ‘A’, the executant of the deed, seeks cancellation of the deed, he has to pay ad-valorem court fee on the consideration stated in the sale deed. If ‘B’, who is a non-executant, is in possession…
-
Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [Mandatory Compliance u/s 42 NDPS Act SC Directions]-13/12/2012
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No. 2118 of 2008] If the information was received when the police officer was in the police station with sufficient time to take action, and if the police…
-
Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors-21/02/2022
Court has power of grant of compensation in the case of violation of Fundamental Rights.
-
Sunil Poddar and ORS Vs Union Bank of India-08/01/2008
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993—Section 22(2)(g)—Transfer of suit—Ex parte decree—Notice sent to the old address though new address was available—Advertisement also published in a Hindi daily—Defendants aware of the proceedings before the Civil Court—It…
-
Sunitha Vs State of Telengana (05/12/2017)
Referring to the lawyers’ fee as barrier to access to justice, it was observed that it was the duty of the Parliament to prescribe fee for services rendered by members of the legal profession. First step should be taken to…
-
Superintendent (Tech. I) Central Excise, I.D.D. Jabalpur and others Versus Pratap Rai-26/04/1978
The rule is that nothing written or said “without prejudice” can be considered at the trial without the consent of both parties—not even by a judge in determining whether or not there is good cause for depriving a successful litigant…
-
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another Vs Union of India-6/11/1993
The role of Chief Justice in Appointment of Judges in High Courts and Supreme Court
-
Supreme Court granted Bail to Teesta Setalvad without considering merits of the case (02/09/2022)
We hasten to add that the relief of interim bail is granted to the appellant in the peculiar facts including the fact that the appellant happens to be a lady. This shall not be taken to be a reflection on…
-
Supreme Court Judgments [SC 1950] INDEX
A.K. Gopalan Vs. The State of Madras [1950] INSC 14 (19 May 1950) A.M. Mair & Co. Vs. Gordhandass Sagarmull [1950] INSC 33 (30 November 1950) Abdulla Ahmed Vs. Animendra Kissen Mitter [1950] INSC 3 (14 March 1950) Ashutosh Lahiry…
-
Suraj Lamp and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Another-11/10/2011
Immovable property can be legally and lawfully transferred/conveyed only by a registered deed of conveyance. Transactions of the nature of ‘GPA sales’ or ‘SA/GPA/WILL transfers’ do not convey title and do not amount to transfer, nor can they be recognized…
-
Suraz India Trust Vs. Union of India-29/09/2021
CONTEMPT OF COURT- Court has held that an apology cannot be a defence, a justification can be accepted if it can be ignored without compromising the dignity of the Court
-
Surendra Singh and others Versus State of Uttar Pradesh-23/11/1953
Judges may, and often do, discuss the matter among themselves and reach a tentative conclusion. That is not their judgment. They may write and exchange drafts. Those are not the judgments either, however heavily and often they may have been…
-
Suresh Chand and Anr. Vs. Suresh Chander (D) through LRS. and Ors- 19/02/2020
Second appeal- Pre-emption-whether a right of pre-emption was available to Beni Prasad who is alleged to be a joint owner in possession of the disputed courtyard. This has arisen in the context of the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act 1961.
