Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Current Judgments
-
Suresh Kumar through GPA Vs. Anil Kakaria & Ors (06/11/2017)
The findings recorded by the three Courts on facts, which are based on appreciation of evidence undertaken by the three Courts, are essentially in the nature of concurrent findings of fact and, therefore, such findings are binding on Supreme Court.
-
Suresh Shah Vs. Hipad Technology India Private Ltd-18/12/2020
If the special statutes do not apply to the premises/property and the lease/tenancy created thereunder as on the date when the cause of action arises to seek for eviction or such other relief and in such transaction if the parties…
-
Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S. Deswal and Others Vs. Virender Gandhi-29/05/19
Section 138 /148 Read with section 143A of the N.I. Act-Whether the first appellate court is justified in directing the appellants – original accused who have been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act to deposit…
-
Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura & Ors (30/09/2022)
SLP-NDPS Act-Preventive detention-the appellant detenu had been released on bail by the Special Court, Tripura despite the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, had not been brought to the notice and on the other hand, this fact…
-
Sushil Vs. Jharkhand High Court: Cut-off marks rule challenged (01/02/2024)
The petitioners challenge the High Court of Jharkhand’s selection process for District Judge Cadre, citing deviations from recruitment rules and introduction of new cut-off marks. The Supreme Court allows the petitions, quashing the 50% aggregate marks requirement and directing the…
-
Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors-09/06/2022
Habeas corpus – the writ petition seeking writ of habeas corpus for production of corpus – Pranav Acharya aged 5 years
-
Swarajya Lakshmi Vs Dr. G. G. Padma Rao-19/10/1973
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Section 13(i)(4)—Virulent and incurable leprosy—Disease found to be malignant and contagious—Known treatment not providing complete treatment nor could correct deformity and mutilations produced by disease—Petitioner is entitled to decree of divorce.
-
Syed Qasim Razvi and others Vs State of Hyderabad and others-19/01/1953
Hyderabad Criminal Procedure Code-the accused was examined under S. 273, Hyderabad Criminal P.C. which corresponds to S. 342, Indian Criminal P.C., and on 5th of December following charges were framed against him under Ss. 123, 124, 330 and 177 read…
-
Tarlok Singh and others Vs State of Punjab-30/07/1973
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898—Section 288 and Evidence Act, 1872— Section 33—Evidence of a witness given in the committal Court—Cannot be treated as evidence after his death in session trial under Section 288 though it may be considered relevant under Section…
-
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors-26/03/2021
In an appeal under Section 423 of the Companies Act, 2013, this Court is concerned with questions of law arising out of the order of NCLAT. Therefore, we will not decide this prayer. It should be pointed out at this…
-
Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd – 02/05/19
As a matter of fact, what was agreed in the Principles of Agreement more amount than that has been ordered to be paid on the basis of principles of business equilibrium and other factors
-
Tejaswini Gaud and Others Vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and Others – 06/05/19
Custody of the Child given to the father – Writ of habeas corpus is a prerogative process for securing the liberty of the subject by affording an effective means of immediate release from an illegal or improper detention. The writ…
-
Thakur Manmohan Deo Vs State of Bihar and others-19/09/1960
The pith and substance of the legislation, however, in my opinion is the transference of ownership of estates to the State Government and falls within the ambit of legislative head entry 36 of List II. There is no scheme of…
-
THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS VS PRANJAL KUMAR SARMA & ORS 28/11/2019
Selection process-the norms existing on the date when the process of selection begins, will control the selection and the alteration to the norms would not affect the ongoing process unless the new Rules are to be given retrospective effect.
-
The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, (Patna) Vs Mahanth Sri Biseshwar Das- 09/02/1971
Hindu Law—Religious endowment—Nature of grant—Property given to Head of Mutt—Nature of grant—Determination of.
-
The Director, Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Ispat Khandan Janta Mazdoor Union-05/07/19
where the contract was to supply of labour and necessary labour was supplied by the contractor who worked under the directions, supervision and control of the principal employer, that in itself will not in any manner construe the contract entered…
-
The Maharashtra Public Service Commission through its Secretary Vs. Sandeep Shriram Warade – 03/05/19
The essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide. If the language of the advertisement and the rules are clear, the Court cannot sit in judgment over the same. If there is an ambiguity in…
-
The Mumbai Kamgar Sabha, Bombay Vs M/s. Abdulbhai Faizullabhai and others-10/03/1976
It is trite, going by Anglophonic principles, that a ruling of a Superior Court is binding law. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA The Mumbai Kamgar Sabha, Bombay Versus M/s. Abdulbhai Faizullabhai and others (Before : V. R. Krishna Iyer And N.…
-
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya & Ors-17/7/2010
Courts are indeed conscious of the limitations which issues of national security and policy impose on the judicial evolution of doctrine in matters relating to the Armed forces. For this reason, we have noticed that the engagement of women in…
-
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS Vs PHULPARI KUMARI- 06/12/2019
Departmental Inquiry : It is settled law that interference with the orders passed pursuant to a departmental inquiry can be only in case of ‘no evidence’. Sufficiency of evidence is not within the realm of judicial review.
-
The State of Bombay Versus Atma Ram Shridhar Vaidya-25/01/1951.
Subjective satisfaction—Scope of Judicial review—The grounds of detention cannot be challenged except on the ground of mala fides—The Court cannot sit in appeal over the grounds of detention to assess the sufficiency of the grounds or to come to a…
-
The State of West Bengal Versus The Administrator, Howrah Municipality and others- 14/12/1971.
AIR 1972 SC 749 : (1972) 2 SCR 874 : (1972) 1 SCC 366 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) The State of West Bengal Versus The Administrator, Howrah Municipality and others (Before : C. A. Vaidialingam And K. K. Mathew, JJ.)…
-
Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj AND OTHERS Versus State of Rajasthan-21/01/1963
The participation of the members of the public in the Darshan in the temple and in the daily acts of worship or in the celebrations of festival occasions may be a very important factor to consider in determining the character…
-
TRIAL OF MAHATMA GANDHI-1922
The account of this trial is in substance taken from an admirable summary of it given by Sir Thomas Strangman in his book “Indian Courts and Characters”. In March 1922, Gandhi was tried before Mr. Broomfield, I.C.S., District & Sessions…
